ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAMMERMILL
Please correct my memory but I thought as of 2 years ago the Pats were #2 in regard to jersey's hat's etc.. sold
Raiders were #one
Pats always sell out the stadium,buy a lot of products.
Isn't that loyality?
Stats,stats,and Damn stats can be munipulated any way you want them.
cleveland,and green bay,buffalo,absolutely some of the others WTF.
How did the Pats tickets and apparel sell when we were the lovable losers? It's not loyal for a bunch of people to jump on the Pats bandwagon. I didn't look at the poll so I don't know how they figured it out, but just going by real life experience, I wouldn't put Pats fans in the top 10. I can remember when Pats games got blacked out due to not selling out
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaychamp
How did the Pats tickets and apparel sell when we were the lovable losers? It's not loyal for a bunch of people to jump on the Pats bandwagon. I didn't look at the poll so I don't know how they figured it out, but just going by real life experience, I wouldn't put Pats fans in the top 10. I can remember when Pats games got blacked out due to not selling out
I Remember those times too.
And yes,the pats in those dark days were on the bottom of the food chain.
(but we supported them anyway)
The turn around was Parcells/Then Kraft and success.
Why should people be critisized when they were teenagers or younger at that time?
The Pats have also gathered fans based on their team first attidude.
They were a blessing in 2001(based on ther play-and tragedy's that happened in the country)
To me it's not based on (blind -longevity)based on there support on what they see "product on the field'.
The true test will be when the Pats become bad again,I don't see that happing soon
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAMMERMILL
I Remember those times too.
And yes,the pats in those dark days were on the bottom of the food chain.
(but we supported them anyway)
The turn around was Parcells/Then Kraft and success.
Why should people be critisized when they were teenagers or younger at that time?
The Pats have also gathered fans based on their team first attidude.
They were a blessing in 2001(based on ther play-and tragedy's that happened in the country)
To me it's not based on (blind -longevity)based on there support on what they see "product on the field'.
The true test will be when the Pats become bad again,I don't see that happing soon
'Tis a good point. I really have no issue with people that became Pats fans because of what they represent, just the flavour of the month people. The same people that won't support, buy tickets, or watch the Pats when the bad times come. Whatever though, people like us that went through all those bad times appreciate the SB wins that much more.
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
As discussed in the thread a month ago, the criteria used for ranking fan loyalty was, to say the least, suspect. In essense, the rankings are worthless.
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthSeeker
As discussed in the thread a month ago, the criteria used for ranking fan loyalty was, to say the least, suspect. In essense, the rankings are worthless.
Fluctuations in attendance over a ten year period, correlated with team winning %, cold weather, and fan per capita income et. al. seem like decent criteria. This study was not referred to in the thread a month ago.Most rabid NFL fanbases
Last edited by PonyExpress; 10-19-2006 at 06:23 PM..
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthSeeker
As discussed in the thread a month ago, the criteria used for ranking fan loyalty was, to say the least, suspect. In essense, the rankings are worthless.
It's interesting that they at least tried to do it in an objective way. Better than all of those lame top-10 lists.
__________________
Drink like a beast.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Stopped reading after "Houston #7".
Lots of folks stay married seven years.
And another thing, how can you route for a team that is itself a location.
What it if the Patriots were called the New England, Foxboros. That's a team I want to root for. Though at least weith that you could have a mascot that was half-foc, half boro, as opposed to say, the the Pittburgh (West Side of the satte) Pensylvainians.
The Kansas City, Missourians?
Re: Pats fans ranked #15 in fan loyalty by bizjournal
Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress
Fluctuations in attendance over a ten year period, correlated with team winning %, cold weather, and fan per capita income et. al. seem like decent criteria. This study was not referred to in the thread a month ago.Most rabid NFL fanbases
Thanks, PonyExpress, my mistake. The studies are indeed quite different as one of them listed Pittsburgh as #2 and the other as #21. Just goes to show how hard it is to come up with good, objective criteria.