WR numbers (take with a grain of salt) - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2006, 01:50 PM   #1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

Yes, I KNOW there's way more to what's happening than what can be seen in the numbers. And yes, if Branch and Givens were here, the O would very likely be clicking more, they know the system, etc... And yes, different systems, different opponents, different teammates - all of this skews everything and stats lie. Having said all that...

Givens - 3 games, 7 REC, 101 yards, 0 TDs, 5 FDs
Branch - 1 game, 2 REC, 23 yards, 0 TDs, 2 FDs
Davis - 3 games - NOTHING

Caldwell - 3 games, 7 REC, 93 yards, 7 FDs
Gabriel - 2 games, 6 REC, 65 yards, 1 TD, 5 FDs
Jackson - 1 game, 2 REC, 42 yards, 1 TD, 2 FD


Give it time. These guys can produce. If they can't by, say, week 10, feel free to write this season off. All we have to do is improve steadily and make the playoffs.
patsox23 is online now   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-25-2006, 01:55 PM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,390
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

Branch isnt going to put up big numbers early because they have 3 other good recievers. He may not even necesarily be a starter. He is like a #3.

Caldwell isnt playing badly. He would problably be doing a lot better then decent if Brady was in sync.

Last edited by Kdo5; 09-25-2006 at 01:56 PM..
Kdo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:00 PM   #3
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Ceresco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 590
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

After seeing Gabriel in the 4th quarter, I'm excited to see Brady and him continue to build chemistry. Should be fun to watch.
Ceresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:13 PM   #4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kdo5
Branch isnt going to put up big numbers early because they have 3 other good recievers. He may not even necesarily be a starter. He is like a #3.
Which begs the question, Why pay him top 10 WR money?
patsox23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:15 PM   #5
Practice Squad
 
mdhprime's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 354
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

I think the Patriots receivers all look pretty promising right now. I am looking forward to a game where they are all relatively 100% healthy.
mdhprime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:15 PM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

EX-PATS - 7 games, 9 REC, 124 yards, 0 TDs, 7 FDs
NEW PATS - 6 games, 15 REC, 200 yards, 2 TDs, 14 TDs

Meanwhile, the ex-pats cost 12+ million per year, and the new Pats cost, well...a whole lot less.

Last edited by patsox23; 09-25-2006 at 02:17 PM..
patsox23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:19 PM   #7
Practice Squad
 
mdhprime's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 354
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsox23
EX-PATS - 7 games, 9 REC, 124 yards, 0 TDs, 7 FDs
NEW PATS - 6 games, 15 REC, 200 yards, 2 TDs, 14 TDs

Meanwhile, the ex-pats cost 12+ million per year, and the new Pats cost, well...a whole lot less.
I hope the trend continues.
mdhprime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:25 PM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdhprime
I hope the trend continues.
lol. same here. Obviously, Branch is going to put up pretty big numbers, but - at 7 mill per season - he may have to put up CRAZY numbers to justify the difference between what his production would've been here and what Gabriel's will be.
patsox23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:36 PM   #9
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 82
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsox23
lol. same here. Obviously, Branch is going to put up pretty big numbers, but - at 7 mill per season - he may have to put up CRAZY numbers to justify the difference between what his production would've been here and what Gabriel's will be.
Of course he'll put up crazy numbers, didn't you know that Deion Branch was open on every play against even the best defenses the past 3 years? That's why he's a perennial lock for 1,000 yards every year.
MTaylorJ1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2006, 02:49 PM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
zippo59's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 5,072
Default Re: WR numbers (take with a grain of salt)

I was at the game last night and saw that the WR's were open a fair amount, Brady just wasn't getting them the ball. That does not mean that the change in WR's is not at all to blame for the offensive struggles, but that the guys we have are capable of getting open.
__________________
"What Tom Brady just did gives me goose bumps."-John Madden after final drive in SB 36


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Unofficial Kevin Faulk supporter.
zippo59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC