Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but..... - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2006, 11:11 PM   #31
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,154
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelizePats
No, you're not wrong. I loved AV but I did not like the way he departed. His range on field goals and kick offs was slipping and I'll eat my hat if he only misses two for the Colts this fall.
Its no upgrade, except for maybe in the locker room.

Rich
I concur. In my opinion its is a major DOWNGRADE for the Colts. Vanderjerk has a more accurate leg, and still has his distance. It was quite clear that AV wasn't going to kick any 50 yarders for the past few years, and wasn't getting many chances by the Coaches for any mid-forties ones either last season. His kickoffs have been getting progressively worse every year.

Vanderjagt was screwed by Pay-me-a-ton who wasted three downs trying for the endzone bomb, rather than getting a 5-10 yard completion to make it a chippie FG, at the end of the Steelers game. That is spelled QB s-t-u-p-i-d-i-t-y!
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-09-2006, 11:18 PM   #32
In the Starting Line-up
 
SeanBruschi54's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 3,392
My Mood: Daring
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yankees/Colts
Mungro had 114 yards in the Eagle game mentioned and the RBs combined for 100 in the 6 TD game mentioned.
Ok see when teams play pass all day and you run with a guy he's going to get yards against teams no matter what. Noticed how in the second game you said combined to get 100, once James wasnt in thier teams just beat the crap out of these guys.


Quote:
Kind of like how the Pats .500 record the first half last year and Brady's performances vs. KC, San Diego, Denver and Carolina, when the Pats defense stunk, might tell you something. They fell behind, often quickly, and needed career games from Brady.
Yea when teams defenses are decimated with injuires your going to lose games. Backups cant always win you the game.
SeanBruschi54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 11:27 PM   #33
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,154
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yankees/Colts
Uh, no.

Once again, Vanderjagt also lost the Miami playoff game. Manning drove them down the field to win, just like Brady did vs. the Rams, but Vanderjagt missed it. Vanderjagt also missed vs. the Pats which would have given the Colts home field advantage. Then in the Steeler game, Peyton drove the Colts down the field to win, just like Brady did vs. the Panthers, but Vanderjagt missed it. If he makes it, the Colts win the Superbowl. Vanderjagt missed as many big FGs as Vinatieri made. It's an easy job when your kicker actually makes them.




And if when Brady fumbles the ball away to the other team in the snow, they let the team who recovers it actually keep it, the Patriots don't have a Superbowl victory.



Except against the Rams to win the Superbowl...

Vinatieri will kick 50 yarders indoors.


He hasn't kicked a 50 yarder in FOUR years. He can't even kick 45 yarders reliably anymore.

The Rams SB game was SIX YEARS AGO !!
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 11:34 PM   #34
Rookie
 
WV-Colt's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 40
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan
...Vanderjagt was screwed by Pay-me-a-ton who wasted three downs trying for the endzone bomb, rather than getting a 5-10 yard completion to make it a chippie FG, at the end of the Steelers game. That is spelled QB s-t-u-p-i-d-i-t-y!
when your kicker has proven that he's unable to make a FG in the clutch, why wouldn't you try and score a TD?
WV-Colt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 04:20 AM   #35
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsRI's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,618
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Article in today's Globe:

Viatieri shunned Patriots:
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...triots/?page=1

He sounds like he was bitter since 04.

About Gostowski:
``He's going to be a good one," Polian said of Gostkowski. ``If we hadn't signed Adam, we probably would have drafted him."
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PatsRI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 05:36 AM   #36
In the Starting Line-up
 
Flying Fungi's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,416
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsRI
Article in today's Globe:

Viatieri shunned Patriots:
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...triots/?page=1

He sounds like he was bitter since 04.

About Gostowski:
``He's going to be a good one," Polian said of Gostkowski. ``If we hadn't signed Adam, we probably would have drafted him."
not impressed...

Quote:
Vinatieri, meanwhile, chose not to notify the Patriots when he reached terms with the Colts.
``I never did contact anyone," Vinatieri said. ``I think Scott Pioli saw it on some league transmission.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Flying Fungi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 06:46 AM   #37
Banned
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,499
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsRI
Article in today's Globe:

Viatieri shunned Patriots:
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...triots/?page=1

He sounds like he was bitter since 04.

"
My thoughts exactly - though I don't blame the Pats' FO for not doing a deal after that year. His kickoffs were a liability in '04, though he improved in '05. His numbers were pretty good in '04, but he only attempted one from 50+ (and that from a fluke F.O.T.K. by the Jets) and he wasn't really kicking in clutch situations since we dominated most games that year.

I'd rather have the first 10 years of a great kicker's career than the last 5, and I think the Pats FO feels the same.

Last edited by Lamanai; 11-14-2005 at 01:56 PM..
richpats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 07:02 AM   #38
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Clonamery's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,153
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Read the article. Some people the more they speak and try to explain their situation, the more you realize just how shallow they really are. He was a great performer for the Patriots but if I comment further it will only be spit....
Clonamery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 08:19 AM   #39
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,095
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by WV-Colt
when your kicker has proven that he's unable to make a FG in the clutch, why wouldn't you try and score a TD?
The reality is, the Colts last offensive plays show the opposite. They show complete confidence in Vanderjagt to make that kick. They were playing as if it was a chip shot.

They had 30 seconds, 2 TOs and a 2nd and 2. That is minimum 2 plays before the FG, possibly even 3 or 4 if you can get out of bounds on 1. If you are worreid about your kicker, don't you hit a 10-15 yard pass, make it a chip shot and then go for the end zone? The only reason not to do that is either you think you already have a chip shot or the QB made a huge mental error.

Coaches and Qbs will tell you when running a 2 minute drill down 3, the goal is to make sure you get the 3. Once you are in range where you are assured of the 3, you can go for the win.

Last edited by dhamz; 08-10-2006 at 08:21 AM..
dhamz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 10:26 AM   #40
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Trying to be unbiased on Vinatieri, but.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by richpats
My thoughts exactly - though I don't blame the Pats' FO for not doing a deal after that year. His kickoffs were a liability in '04, though he improved in '05. His numbers were pretty good in '04, but he only attempted one from 50+ (and that from a fluke F.O.T.K. by the Jets) and he wasn't really kicking in clutch situations since we dominated most games that year.

I'd rather have the first 10 years of a great kicker's career than the last 5, and I think the Pats FO feels the same.
It's statements like that made as if they are fact that drive me nuts. In 2004 he had the third best KO distance average in his career. Coupled with the best PK percentage in his illustrious career. And it's not his decision how many kicks to attempt at 50+. That's Bill's, and one he will very seldom make unless he has no other alternative.

This was always about the Patriots unwillingness to commit to a guy whose agent, who had a somewhat unholy alliance with this FO, may have led the team to believe he could be had without a long term committment over the last 10. I guess he was wrong which is why he (and his replacement lackey) got fired.

This FO and ownership leaked to it friends in the local media for months that Adam wasn't going anywhere. That led most teams with kicker needs to believe there was no point persuing him. When he got to GB they couldn't get a number out of his agent which is the only reason he left there without an offer. But that was also when he finally smartened up and cut the cord with the Cornish group. And I for one don't blame him a bit - I guess because unlike some here I'm willing to acknowledge my own inclination to be vindictive when I think I'm being disrespected or taken advantage of. Adam never did anything but make BB's life easier from the day he arrived as HC. On and off the field and in the locker room. An almost unheard of PK acknowledged by this FO as a core player and leader. When guys deliver as Adam did they shouldn't have to grovel.

If the Patriots believed the other tripe about rankings (which they don't unless it suits their purposes in negotiations) they would not have been prepared to keep him here at a $2.5M+ cap hit for 2006 and purportedly beyond. They were just playing coy with a guy they thought they emotionally owned, and it backfired. That they were not given one last chance after two years of opportunity to get a real long term deal done is just too damn bad. Like BB always says, it's a business on both sides.

All that remains to be seen is whether his signing positively impacts his new team, I hope not - although he is saving them a million and a half and that KO roster spot Vanderjerk could not fill either at the very least right out of the gate. And whether a rookie or a retread with issues or both can kick successfully and consistently this year let alone long term in a venue most kickers rank as one of the toughest in the league remains to be seen.
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566