Rumors: Adam deal potentially illegal? - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-23-2006, 10:28 AM   #11
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 673
My Mood: Confused
Default

I think the Colts should lose a draft choice for making a deal with an agent that was not the official representative of a free agent player. Further, the League should suspend the agent for illegal practices.

Unfortunately Adam Vinatieri comes out of this with a new contarct but has his integrity tarnished.

Curious that Vinatieri doesn't want to talk about the negotiations - because they were illegal!!!


The Patriots will get nothing from this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Mark Morse is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-23-2006, 10:39 AM   #12
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
workhorse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Morse
I think the Colts should lose a draft choice for making a deal with an agent that was not the official representative of a free agent player. Further, the League should suspend the agent for illegal practices.

Unfortunately Adam Vinatieri comes out of this with a new contarct but has his integrity tarnished.

Curious that Vinatieri doesn't want to talk about the negotiations - because they were illegal!!!


The Patriots will get nothing from this.
I'm sure you want to penalize the Colts, but that's just because they are the Colts. Has anyone noticed that they haven't officially anounced that there is a deal in place? I'm sure that is so they are in the clear with the agent change time period.
workhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 10:44 AM   #13
JR4
In the Starting Line-up
 
JR4's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,631
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Since the NFL can apparently suspend agents it must have some authority
over agent conduct.
This activity seems very wrong.
If it is allowed then consider the following.

Player has officially Agent A but contacts Agents B and C and lets it be know
that if they get a better deal the player will dump the current agent go with
the agent that gets the better deal.

This is wrong and not ethical. This is essentially what can be argued here.
How much fault is on the team is not known. But if collusion can be proven
between the new agent and the Colts this could be a mess.
JR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 11:20 AM   #14
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
workhorse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR4
Since the NFL can apparently suspend agents it must have some authority
over agent conduct.
This activity seems very wrong.
If it is allowed then consider the following.

Player has officially Agent A but contacts Agents B and C and lets it be know
that if they get a better deal the player will dump the current agent go with
the agent that gets the better deal.

This is wrong and not ethical. This is essentially what can be argued here.
How much fault is on the team is not known. But if collusion can be proven
between the new agent and the Colts this could be a mess.
I've never seen an organization get penalized for an agent rules infracation.
workhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 11:54 AM   #15
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,626
My Mood: Amused
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by workhorse
I'm sure you want to penalize the Colts, but that's just because they are the Colts. Has anyone noticed that they haven't officially anounced that there is a deal in place? I'm sure that is so they are in the clear with the agent change time period.
Workhorse -
It doesn't matter that they haven't signed the deal yet. What matters is the fact remains that Gary Uberstine's office is who called the Colts regarding Adam's availability last week. PRIOR to Adam even visiting Green Bay. And prior to Adam officially firing Cornich's office.

I think that Cornich's office would actually have legal right to go after both Uberstine's office AND Adam himself because of this. Also, there is a good chance that Uberstine's office could be suspended the way that Carl Poston was suspended.

This smacks of unethical business practices.
DaBruinz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:20 PM   #16
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
workhorse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz
Workhorse -
It doesn't matter that they haven't signed the deal yet. What matters is the fact remains that Gary Uberstine's office is who called the Colts regarding Adam's availability last week. PRIOR to Adam even visiting Green Bay. And prior to Adam officially firing Cornich's office.

I think that Cornich's office would actually have legal right to go after both Uberstine's office AND Adam himself because of this. Also, there is a good chance that Uberstine's office could be suspended the way that Carl Poston was suspended.

This smacks of unethical business practices.
You aren't stating anything I don't agree with. But it is all on the agent, not the Colts.
workhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:27 PM   #17
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,626
My Mood: Amused
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by workhorse
You aren't stating anything I don't agree with. But it is all on the agent, not the Colts.
Actually, it is also on the Colts because they would have known that Uberstine wasn't Vinatieri's agent at the time Uberstine contacted them. They should have told Uberstine to contact them when he represented Vinatieri, not before.

Any deal that they negotiated in was done in bad faith since they purposely were circumventing the rules on when an agent could represent a player in those negotiations.
DaBruinz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:34 PM   #18
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
FreeTedWilliams's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: free from the cold
Posts: 5,031
My Mood: Grumpy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR4
Since the NFL can apparently suspend agents it must have some authority
over agent conduct.
This activity seems very wrong.
If it is allowed then consider the following.

Player has officially Agent A but contacts Agents B and C and lets it be know
that if they get a better deal the player will dump the current agent go with
the agent that gets the better deal.

This is wrong and not ethical. This is essentially what can be argued here.
How much fault is on the team is not known. But if collusion can be proven
between the new agent and the Colts this could be a mess.
Actually it is the NFLPA (the player's union) that has the ability to suspend/ban agents. So don't look for them to mess with the highest ever kicker contract.
__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FreeTedWilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:43 PM   #19
JR4
In the Starting Line-up
 
JR4's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,631
My Mood: Inspired
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz
Actually, it is also on the Colts because they would have known that Uberstine wasn't Vinatieri's agent at the time Uberstine contacted them. They should have told Uberstine to contact them when he represented Vinatieri, not before.

Any deal that they negotiated in was done in bad faith since they purposely were circumventing the rules on when an agent could represent a player in those negotiations.
Of course the Colts would contend what do they gain from talking to
one agent vs another and that to them it made no difference.

But I think there could be a reason why Colts wanted Uberstine instead of
Cornich.
Suppose Colts knew with Cornich that any offer they made would have a
chance to be matched by the Patriots.
So Colts contact Uberstine and say will work with him but there can be no
allowing PATs to match their offer.
Uberstine agrees and then contacts Adam and lays it out.

It just seem strange that Uberstine would on his own go out and contact the
Colts when he wasn't even Adams agent not even knowing that Adam
would drop Cornich if he got the deal.
Something really smells here.

Last edited by JR4; 03-23-2006 at 12:44 PM..
JR4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2006, 12:51 PM   #20
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
workhorse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR4
Of course the Colts would contend what do they gain from talking to
one agent vs another and that to them it made no difference.

But I think there could be a reason why Colts wanted Uberstine instead of
Cornich.
Suppose Colts knew with Cornich that any offer they made would have a
chance to be matched by the Patriots.
So Colts contact Uberstine and say will work with him but there can be no
allowing PATs to match their offer.
Uberstine agrees and then contacts Adam and lays it out.

It just seem strange that Uberstine would on his own go out and contact the
Colts when he wasn't even Adams agent not even knowing that Adam
would drop Cornich if he got the deal.
Something really smells here.
There would be no advantage to an agent to not let another team try to match or better an offer. Agents work off of a percentage of a contract and it's in their best interest to get teams into a bidding war. So it would make no sense for him not to go to the Pats after the Colts made an offer.
workhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC