TBC productivity - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2010, 01:41 PM   #11
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,633
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsinthesnow View Post
Wow, those are some awesome stats. People think "once a JAG, always a JAG".

Steelers James Harrison disproved this by being cut a couple of times to being the DPOY.
And you don't think that 'Blitzburgh's' aggressive 3-4 defensive scheme didn't have a lot to do with Harrison's success? Look, I'm not disputing that Harrison is a talented player in his own right, but the 3-4 defense tends to make its OLBs look better than they actually might be.

I think that's why year after year, Pittsburgh can let big name linebackers walk and still enjoy a tremendous amount of success on defense with replacement players. Linebackers are fungible in their 3-4 system. I think the same is true of the Pats 3-4 to a certain extent. This may also well explain BB's lack of emphasis in drafting linebackers early outside of Jerod Mayo.

Vrabel and TBC do have a certain degree of talent that contributed to their success, absolutely. But take them outside of the Pats system and do you see them putting up Peppers or Jared Allen type numbers? I don't see it happening.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!

Last edited by VJCPatriot; 03-07-2010 at 01:44 PM..
VJCPatriot is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-07-2010, 01:54 PM   #12
Practice Squad
 
Sleeping King's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 106
Default Re: TBC Productivity

I hate to downplay the significance of doing well against a division rival but TBC did have half of his sacks in the two games against Buffalo.

I'm certainly glad he is back but you are mentioning him in the same sentence as some elite pass rushers.
Sleeping King is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 01:58 PM   #13
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,618
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot View Post
And you don't think that 'Blitzburgh's' aggressive 3-4 defensive scheme didn't have a lot to do with Harrison's success? Look, I'm not disputing that Harrison is a talented player in his own right, but the 3-4 defense tends to make its OLBs look better than they actually might be.

I think that's why year after year, Pittsburgh can let big name linebackers walk and still enjoy a tremendous amount of success on defense with replacement players. Linebackers are fungible in their 3-4 system. I think the same is true of the Pats 3-4 to a certain extent. This may also well explain BB's lack of emphasis in drafting linebackers early outside of Jerod Mayo.

Vrabel and TBC do have a certain degree of talent that contributed to their success, absolutely. But take them outside of the Pats system and do you see them putting up Peppers or Jared Allen type numbers? I don't see it happening.
I think a lot is perception also. Our system simply doesnt lend itself to individual players getting gaudy stats. And perception is that stats equal talent. Defensively that simply isnt true, and in our system its not close to true.
We absolutely value versatile players. We want the LB who is better in his area of weakness not the one who has the greatest strengths. Then we ask them to do it all, at the expense of sack totals.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:01 PM   #14
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Brady2Welker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 891
My Mood: Drunk
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeping King View Post
I hate to downplay the significance of doing well against a division rival but TBC did have half of his sacks in the two games against Buffalo.

I'm certainly glad he is back but you are mentioning him in the same sentence as some elite pass rushers.
We beat them by 1 and 7 respectively, it wouldn't be a leap of faith to say that without 5 QB sacks that we could have lost the game. I know Fitzpatrick isn't P. Manning who you need to have pressure on to succeed, but after seeing Chad Henne shred our defense, I wouldn't put it past Fitzpatrick to without being sacked.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
I'm using their raw stats, not their opinions.
I did note that looking the 'pressure' category, it should be taken with a grain of salt because it is unofficial and could be applied arbitrarily.
I was going to comment on that, that if OP was was using raw data and drawing his own conclusions it was much accurate. That said, however, all data needs to taken with a grain of salt.


Also, regarding system players, although that's true, you want to tell me that most good pass rushers aren't system players? Jared Allen, immensely talented as he is would be slightly less good without the Williams wall. Freeney wouldn't be as great without their line too. Every defensive player is in some way, a product of the system. Because if you're with awful JAGs at Dline, you can get doubled/chipped all day.

Last edited by Brady2Welker; 03-07-2010 at 02:05 PM..
Brady2Welker is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:07 PM   #15
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,618
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeping King View Post
I hate to downplay the significance of doing well against a division rival but TBC did have half of his sacks in the two games against Buffalo.

I'm certainly glad he is back but you are mentioning him in the same sentence as some elite pass rushers.
And those games were 20% of our wins.
Taylor and Porter played them twice too
Peppers had 4 of his 10 in back to back games against the dregs in Washington and Tampa. Eliminate those 2, and TBC vs Buffalo, and you have Peppers with 1 more sack in 90 more rush attempts and still a lower ratio.
Peppers also had 16 of his 33 pressure in a 3 game span near the end of the season when the Panthers were out of it, so if you donwgrade TBC for inconsistency Peppers is equally incncistent. By the way, I think you will find that with almost any pass rusher.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:11 PM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,417
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot View Post
And you don't think that 'Blitzburgh's' aggressive 3-4 defensive scheme didn't have a lot to do with Harrison's success? Look, I'm not disputing that Harrison is a talented player in his own right, but the 3-4 defense tends to make its OLBs look better than they actually might be.

I think that's why year after year, Pittsburgh can let big name linebackers walk and still enjoy a tremendous amount of success on defense with replacement players. Linebackers are fungible in their 3-4 system. I think the same is true of the Pats 3-4 to a certain extent. This may also well explain BB's lack of emphasis in drafting linebackers early outside of Jerod Mayo.

Vrabel and TBC do have a certain degree of talent that contributed to their success, absolutely. But take them outside of the Pats system and do you see them putting up Peppers or Jared Allen type numbers? I don't see it happening.
YouTube - James Harrison intercepted Kurt Warner for 100 yards

You could argue it's the Steelers system, but a system player wouldn't make that play.
patsinthesnow is online now  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:15 PM   #17
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,633
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsinthesnow View Post
YouTube - James Harrison intercepted Kurt Warner for 100 yards

You could argue it's the Steelers system, but a system player wouldn't make that play.
Why not? It was his assignment to drop back on that play. Warner did not anticipate Harrison dropping back, and on the runback he had some good blocking in front of him. That play happened by design. It's the perfect example of the Pittsburgh scheme at work. They blitz you and pressure you on one play, then bring pressure from a different area and/or drop a guy into coverage on the next.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!

Last edited by VJCPatriot; 03-07-2010 at 02:31 PM..
VJCPatriot is online now  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:25 PM   #18
Practice Squad
 
Sleeping King's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 106
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
And those games were 20% of our wins.
Taylor and Porter played them twice too
Peppers had 4 of his 10 in back to back games against the dregs in Washington and Tampa. Eliminate those 2, and TBC vs Buffalo, and you have Peppers with 1 more sack in 90 more rush attempts and still a lower ratio.
Peppers also had 16 of his 33 pressure in a 3 game span near the end of the season when the Panthers were out of it, so if you donwgrade TBC for inconsistency Peppers is equally incncistent. By the way, I think you will find that with almost any pass rusher.
Although I think the real difference that seems to be overlooked is that TBC isn't the focal point of a offensive teams strategy.

Peppers, Allen and Freeney are going against a glut of double teams and protection slides. I don't have the stats to back it up but I would venture to say he had half the double teams of those elite pass rushers. I just hope this doesn't come off as a bash TBC post. It certainly is not intended that way. He's the best we have right now at getting pressure.
Sleeping King is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:28 PM   #19
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,223
Default Re: TBC Productivity

Great stuff, thanks for sharing.
__________________
Organized madness
The young Gott-stra
Young Frank Sinatra
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 02:28 PM   #20
In the Starting Line-up
 
PatsBoy12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: A Strange Place
Posts: 4,548
My Mood: Worried
Default Re: TBC Productivity

This is a very good thread. Great information!
PatsBoy12 is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New England industrial output and productivity outlook for January... GameDay PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 01-17-2007 01:49 PM
Wide Receiver productivity, 2001-2006 Kasmir PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 19 12-22-2006 07:21 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC