Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2009, 04:56 PM   #1
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rowley, MA
Posts: 222
Default More WR Talent

Which group of WRs do you think has more talent (QBs being EQUAL...lets say Payton Manning could work with either one)...no homers please.

• 88 Sam Aiken
• 11 Julian Edelman
• 81 Randy Moss
• 19 Brandon Tate KR
• 83 Wes Welker PR

• 81 Jason Avant
• 86 Reggie Brown
• 80 Kevin Curtis
• 10 DeSean Jackson PR
• 18 Jeremy Maclin
Iron Helmet is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-03-2009, 05:09 PM   #2
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 181
Default Re: More WR Talent

Moss much better than Jackson
Welker much better than Maclin
Our 3 together are better than their other 3.

I would say that Tate has the talent to potentially be better than Maclin.

And i'm not a Homer.
__________________
Paul, London

Patriot and Proud
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
patriotscpfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:16 PM   #3
Destroy! Enjoy!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flawda
Posts: 7,522
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: More WR Talent

Quote:
Originally Posted by patriotscpfc View Post
Moss much better than Jackson
Welker much better than Maclin
Our 3 together are better than their other 3.

I would say that Tate has the talent to potentially be better than Maclin.

And i'm not a Homer.
I would pretty much agree to this except for the fact that I don't think Tate is going to be better than Maclin in the long run. And I do think that Tate is going to be very good. On top of that, I would take Reggie Brown or Kevin Curtis over Sam Aiken.

Question - What is the basis for this comparison?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


PATS @ COLTS POSTGAME ANALYSIS BLOG IS NOW UP!
KontradictioN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:21 PM   #4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,006
Default Re: More WR Talent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Helmet View Post
Which group of WRs do you think has more talent (QBs being EQUAL...lets say Payton Manning could work with either one)...no homers please.

• 88 Sam Aiken
• 11 Julian Edelman
• 81 Randy Moss
• 19 Brandon Tate KR
• 83 Wes Welker PR

• 81 Jason Avant
• 86 Reggie Brown
• 80 Kevin Curtis
• 10 DeSean Jackson PR
• 18 Jeremy Maclin
Why compare 5? Usually a team only activates 4 WRs for a game, so who cares if my #5 is better than your #5?

Looking over the list, I have to ask myself if this is a trick question. I'd like to see the rathionale why the Iggles have a better WR corps.
__________________
"... you did not want to draft JaMarcus Russell. He is a great player. Get over it ..."
- Al Davis explaining why Lane Kiffin was not a good judge of NFL talent.
spacecrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:21 PM   #5
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rowley, MA
Posts: 222
Default Re: More WR Talent

Wondering who has the more talented WR Corps. Debate with Eagles fan.
Iron Helmet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:23 PM   #6
Destroy! Enjoy!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flawda
Posts: 7,522
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: More WR Talent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Helmet View Post
Wondering who has the more talented WR Corps. Debate with Eagles fan.
This isn't exactly the best place to post this then. You're going to get a pro-Patriots slant at every turn, despite the fact that you said "no homer". You'd be better off posting this on a New York Giants forum (a.k.a. - a team that hates both the Pats and the Eagles).
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


PATS @ COLTS POSTGAME ANALYSIS BLOG IS NOW UP!
KontradictioN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:24 PM   #7
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: More WR Talent

Moss and Welker are better than all their WR's....but I don' tknow how anyone can say Aiken, Edelman, or Tate are better than Kurtis, Brown, or Maclin...yet. Tate hasn't done ANYTHING yet, and Aiken hasn't exactly been stellar (besides his play against the Bucs). Edelman has been solid, but you can't say he's better than Kevin Kurtis, who already has proven to be a solid receiver over the course of a full year.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The Colts shock and awe offense ... was shockingly awful." - quote from NFL Game Of The Week (2005 div vs Indy)
skri65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:24 PM   #8
Practice Squad
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 343
Default Re: More WR Talent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Helmet View Post
Which group of WRs do you think has more talent (QBs being EQUAL...lets say Payton Manning could work with either one)...no homers please.

• 88 Sam Aiken
• 11 Julian Edelman
• 81 Randy Moss
• 19 Brandon Tate KR
• 83 Wes Welker PR

• 81 Jason Avant
• 86 Reggie Brown
• 80 Kevin Curtis
• 10 DeSean Jackson PR
• 18 Jeremy Maclin
Simple they dont have a Randy Moss. A 6 foot 5 receiver who can make the jump/spectacular catches.

I was suprised they drafted Maclin, as I thought he was the same type of receiver as Jackson. Two Burners that are not physically intimidating.
__________________
.
patsinthesnow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:36 PM   #9
Practice Squad
 
mystrymaster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 139
Default Re: More WR Talent

There is no way the Eagles receiving core is remotely in the same league as the Pats corps. That is just preposterous.
mystrymaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:00 PM   #10
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Default Re: More WR Talent

The Eagles are deeper, but they don't have anyone who can compare to Moss or Welker.
Patriot 37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
position ranking, wide receiver

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426