Pats726

RB Taylor, WR Galloway, OL Light, DL Brace....4 others...am thinking Ohrenberger...(with Simmons backing up at OT) CB Wheatley, S Lockett and (One of Wilfork/Warren/Watson or Ninkovich...If those 3 are healthy...)

MrBigglesWorth

whats the deal with brace?

__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers

farn

Have to agree... what's up with Brace and the fact Pryor is contributing ?

jbb9s

why are they going to continually de-activate Galloway?. Get him out there, see if he can play and play him - or cut him. 2 bad games (ok - it was more like 4) don't tarnish a 15 yr track record.

There is no reason to have an inactive healthy vet - inactives and PS positions are for young developmental players and injured guys.

As to Brace and Pyror being "ahead of him", it happens from time to time. (Wilhite over Wheatley comes to mind that that was a bigger pick spread). I kind of thought Brace would get a lot of snaps when they traded Sey. I suspect Peas did too.

Pats726

Well...if it was a good weather day, I would think Galloway would be active...BUT..if it's a rainy windy day..they do not need an extra WR...they have to pay him for the year...so they will not drop him until they REALLY need the position on the 53....
Pryor has been ahead of Brace since PREGAME 1...he looked really good all through that time..Brace has been a ways back...but that is NOT that unusual..

Pats726

Actually PSquad positions are for healthy young players...NOT vets and not those injured. Inactives are those that are not needed in the game..those injured and those in positions where they can be least used...which would usually be a RB, 2 OL, 1 DL...and such...as well as those injured. Taylor is the RB...Light might be one of the OL..Brace the DL..It also has to do with those on ST. So Chung, Alexander, Ninkovich and others who play a LOT of ST will not be inactive. If players are healthy, it comes down to who is least valuable as a backup or ST player.

KontradictioN

I really hope that Galloway isn't inactive tomorrow. He's a deep threat who, at the very least, makes defenses think twice about shifting their coverage over to exclusively Welker and Moss. Best case scenario, he's capable of breaking the big one. He would have had a HUGE TD that would have won us the game if Brady was capable of getting the ball to him in Week 2. I want to see him active.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian

Pats726

If it was a good weather game, I agree...but in heavy rain and wind..he's not needed..unless there is an injury and Welker/Moss are out. Maybe in London..against teh Bucs..

KontradictioN

Even in heavy rain and wind, Galloway is still capable of creating separation. If he and Brady can get their timing down, he's capable of catching the shorter and intermediate passes.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian

BradyBranch39

You sure about that?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.