OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets? - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoaDirty
Wow. You guys take paranoia to the next level.
If this were the Seahawks, you guys would care less.
What in the world would lead you to make this conclusion? The fact that if the Patriots are involved in any sort of apparent scandal that our team, the head coach and the administration are hung out to dry both publicly and privately?
Every time something involves the Patriots, a which hunt begins.. because unlike the Jets, we're a successful organization.
The NFL needs to crack down on their cheating arses and make an example, media market or not. That's why we have rules. They apply for everybody not just somebody when you feel like it.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
I think saying that there's some kind of vendetta against the Pats within the league is misguided. IMO, it's in the media, and not for any particularly sinister reason. ESPN knows that most of the country hates the Pats on account of their success, and therefore they can get people talking and get tons of viewership by feeding them what they want: anti-Patriots horse****. As always, it's all about money.
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausbacker
What in the world would lead you to make this conclusion? The fact that if the Patriots are involved in any sort of apparent scandal that our team, the head coach and the administration are hung out to dry both publicly and privately?
Every time something involves the Patriots, a which hunt begins.. because unlike the Jets, we're a successful organization.
The NFL needs to crack down on their cheating arses and make an example, media market or not. That's why we have rules. They apply for everybody not just somebody when you feel like it.
I think it is paranoia because of the huge leaps in logic at the beginning of the thread. I'm reading the argument as: The Jets weren't fined for tampering so Goddell must be in their back pocket. That's a huge leap of logic there. By the same logic Goddell must be in cahoots with Minnesota because there were no penalty to the Vikes for tampering with Favre. Could it be that there has been no penalty involved because tampering is hard to prove? The 49ers likely don't have a smoking gun to give to the league like Mangina did when he stabbed BB in the back. If such evidence surfaces, then of course the Jets should have the book thrown at them. But until that time, I'm not going to jump to ridiculous conclusions because of "a source with knowledge of the situation" says so. Instead I'm going to count down the days until the Pats get another chance to shut up that obese blabber-mouth coach ...
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW!
I think saying that there's some kind of vendetta against the Pats within the league is misguided. IMO, it's in the media, and not for any particularly sinister reason. ESPN knows that most of the country hates the Pats on account of their success, and therefore they can get people talking and get tons of viewership by feeding them what they want: anti-Patriots horse****. As always, it's all about money.
Exactly. It's a pretty easy argument that the Pats are the most successful franchise in the league and everyone loves to hate the person on top. The media needs an audience to make money and the best way to do that is to pile on the big dog, because that's what the losers want to see ... the winners brought down to their level.
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoaDirty
I think it is paranoia because of the huge leaps in logic at the beginning of the thread. I'm reading the argument as: The Jets weren't fined for tampering so Goddell must be in their back pocket. That's a huge leap of logic there. By the same logic Goddell must be in cahoots with Minnesota because there were no penalty to the Vikes for tampering with Favre. Could it be that there has been no penalty involved because tampering is hard to prove? The 49ers likely don't have a smoking gun to give to the league like Mangina did when he stabbed BB in the back. If such evidence surfaces, then of course the Jets should have the book thrown at them. But until that time, I'm not going to jump to ridiculous conclusions because of "a source with knowledge of the situation" says so. Instead I'm going to count down the days until the Pats get another chance to shut up that obese blabber-mouth coach ...
I'm saying, there's been these allegations against the Jets repeatedly, you can't just sweep it under the carpet and not investigate.
Do a thorough investigation then come to the conclusion. Not the other way around.
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
The Niners' rights to sign Crabtree would have expired around Week 10.
Their rights to Crabtree, though, would not expire until the 2010 Draft; after free agency began, the Niners would have been able to trade him at that point and recoup something.
That makes some sense. However your reply is not how I understood the situation.
I thought that if Crab did not sign he would not be tradeable because he is not under contract, and thus would be eligible for the 2010 draft.
So maybe we are both rite in that maybe the 9ers could trade there rite to sign Crab, at which point Crab could still choose not to sign,,,,argh.
By the way the only way I ever remember a team getting found guilty and punished by the Commish is when someone confess and admits to tampering. Like the 9ers did.
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
[quote=Gunnails;1543370
By the way the only way I ever remember a team getting found guilty and punished by the Commish is when someone confess and admits to tampering. Like the 9ers did.[/quote]
Or when Favre fessed up that the Jets lied about his injury status.
So...unless a Jet stupidly fesses up about this Crabtree tampering charge it will go unenforced like when they tampered with Curtis Martin and with Deion Branch.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
Re: OT: Jets tampering might have fueled Crabtree deal. Goodell protecting the Jets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
The Niners' rights to sign Crabtree would have expired around Week 10.
Their rights to Crabtree, though, would not expire until the 2010 Draft; after free agency began, the Niners would have been able to trade him at that point and recoup something.
FWIW and future infomation, this isn't completely accurate. After Week 10 the 49ers could still have signed him to a 2010 contract, using part of their 2010 rookie pool (even though they would not receive any extra in that pool for him).
That makes some sense. However your reply is not how I understood the situation.
I thought that if Crab did not sign he would not be tradeable because he is not under contract, and thus would be eligible for the 2010 draft.
So maybe we are both rite in that maybe the 9ers could trade there rite to sign Crab, at which point Crab could still choose not to sign,,,,argh.
By the way the only way I ever remember a team getting found guilty and punished by the Commish is when someone confess and admits to tampering. Like the 9ers did.
Tanny will never admit to tampering. He is a scumbag.