Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2009, 10:46 PM   #21
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,563
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
JBB9S - Jordan is under the Free Agent section since he is a free agent this year.

Personally, I'd kick Jordan to the curb and give the reps to BJGE or give them to a draft pick. What I find funny is that when everyone was going gah-gah over BJGE and saying that he meant the end of Maroney, I was preaching patience. Yet, now everyone wants Jordan even though the guy only had 2 good games. Both games were ones where he had a chip on his shoulder. The Jets and Raiders.
Like I said, Jordan probably plays for the vet minimum so there is no downside to at least bringing him back to camp if he will come. If BJGE beats him out for the #4 spot (behind Maroney, Morris, Faulk) then so be it. But I think Jordan in 2009 is better than BJGE in 2009. BB had a lot of confidence in Jordan who got carries down the stretch when BJGE was inactive.

Sometimes great teams just don't have room for development guys (i.e. Garrett Mills, Chad Jackson, white RB from Navy, Gutz before the Brady injury).
jbb9s is online now   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 206

Updated 2/4/10

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-01-2009, 10:50 PM   #22
Is Sizzlin
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 14,416
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBigglesWorth View Post
all 4 haven't lived up to where they were drafted. all 4 were known for their speed. games speed isn't even the same as combine speed anyways. just look at welker and moss. welker has quick speed. moss has high end.

the 4 players i mentionned were supposedly known for their speed and their speed hasn't made them game changers on a consistent basis.

not great draft picks

watson needs to go when his contract is up. nice guy but doesn't produce.

same with maroney. has produced but can't count on him. too often injured.
Bethel and Jackson clearly didn't live up to expectations. But did you stop to think that maybe, just MAYBE, your expectations are the issue with Watson and Maroney.

You are making judgements on Maroney and Jackson without knowing anything about them. First you make the assinine claim that Maroney was a Combine wonder. Now, after two people have told you that you were wrong, you are back-tracking in a poor attempt to CYA. You can't just admit you were wrong in your statements and move on.

From what I see, one of several issues here is your lack of understanding and your incorrect interpretations of what players were and weren't touted as coming out of college. You have the choice. You can keep digging the hole and making yourself look more foolish or just admit that you were wrong and move on. In all honesty, you'll be doing so from ignore because I am tired of trying to give you relevent information only to have you dismiss it even when others have supported it.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 10:57 PM   #23
Is Sizzlin
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 14,416
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbb9s View Post
Like I said, Jordan probably plays for the vet minimum so there is no downside to at least bringing him back to camp if he will come. If BJGE beats him out for the #4 spot (behind Maroney, Morris, Faulk) then so be it. But I think Jordan in 2009 is better than BJGE in 2009. BB had a lot of confidence in Jordan who got carries down the stretch when BJGE was inactive.

Sometimes great teams just don't have room for development guys (i.e. Garrett Mills, Chad Jackson, white RB from Navy, Gutz before the Brady injury).

As I stated, its my belief that BB gave the carries to Jordan to help showcase him for the free agency period. The reality is that he just didn't run that well except against the Jets and Raiders. Outside those 2 games, Jordan had 57 carries for 204 yards. A 3.5 YPC. I just think BJGE's youth is more of a benefit from a health standpoint.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2009, 11:07 PM   #24
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,187
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Bethel and Jackson clearly didn't live up to expectations. But did you stop to think that maybe, just MAYBE, your expectations are the issue with Watson and Maroney.

You are making judgements on Maroney and Jackson without knowing anything about them. First you make the assinine claim that Maroney was a Combine wonder. Now, after two people have told you that you were wrong, you are back-tracking in a poor attempt to CYA. You can't just admit you were wrong in your statements and move on.

From what I see, one of several issues here is your lack of understanding and your incorrect interpretations of what players were and weren't touted as coming out of college. You have the choice. You can keep digging the hole and making yourself look more foolish or just admit that you were wrong and move on. In all honesty, you'll be doing so from ignore because I am tired of trying to give you relevent information only to have you dismiss it even when others have supported it.
honestly i've never really cared for you. but i will go on and say that maroney is fast. so it brings up the definition of what is a combine workout warrior. well guess what he wasn't clocked as slow as heck. i stand by the combine part. all 4 of those guys had good combines.

we had dillon at the time and BB wanted to add speed. the whole point of the offense the past few years has been to add speed. maroney isn't exactly a bruiser. he can't handle it. all 4 of those guys were and are not bruisers. another common trait of them is that they have and are continuously injured. the expectations coming out of college for a first or second round draft pick it to become a starter. and more importantly to produce in the pros. none of them have come close to what is expected to them. between watson's drops, chad's drops and failure to know the playbook, bethels inability to learn the playbook, and maroney's dancing and running out of bounds instead of taking the hit for extra yards, they all haven't lived to their billing. how come these so called speed guys are always injured?
__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers
MrBigglesWorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 03:13 AM   #25
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,450
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

I'm not singling anybody out on this one but lot's of people on this board would agree that Maroney can't stay on the field. While true, there are other RB's that have had the same problem as well. First, Sammy Morris was out for year week 6 while only being used as a compliment to Maroney. This year, Morris and Jordan missed plenty of games. So, Morris and Jordan are just as injury prone as Maroney. The only back on this roster that is consistently on the field is Faulk. Also, I don't agree with MrBigglesworth that Maroney just runs out of bounds to avoid contact. On the contrary, I've seen Maroney lays some wood when he's in the open field and he has a vicious stiff arm. The problem is he gets these nagging injuries that he just can't shake off. The upside for Maroney is he's still young and will be cheap to resign unless he pulls a DeAngelo Williams next season.

And about Maroney being a workout warrior, he wasn't. While running a 4.45 is fast, it's not workout warrior fast. In fact, most of the running backs in that draft were overshadowed by Reggie Bush.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 01-02-2009 at 03:19 AM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 03:29 AM   #26
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,450
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Maroney has proven he can play in the NFL. Much of the issue to start this season was clearly the O-line and the fact that whatever rehab/surgery was done on his shoulder wasn't enough to get him fully healthy.
Let me clarify, Maroney can play. However, he has to prove that he can stay on the field.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
I guess I don't see what other people see when it comes to Jordan. He had 2 good games and the rest stunk. Putting up 97 yards against the Raiders was no big feat. BJGE stepped up just as much and is 7 years younger.
What ever happened to the "law firm?" He had a couple good games and then dissapeared.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
I disagree that it needs to be a TE. A receiver, in general, who can command the middle. Also, the Patriots havent' used the TE to control the middle of the field since Christian Fauria left, really. I don't know if Brady just doesn't trust the receivers there or what.
I'm just saying that the Pat's TE's that should take advantage of the double teams of Moss and Welker.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Matt Birk will be 33 when the season starts.. Adding him really doesn't so anything for the team in my honest opinion. I also don't see Tauscher as being an answer at RT. Gross could be, but how much of an upgrade is he over Kaczur? And is that level of upgrade worth 5-6 million more than what the Pats are paying Kaczur?
These were just names being thrown around. I still think that their interior part of their line needs some serious upgrade. Too many times during the year on third and short we would see Koppen getting bull rushed into the backfield causing a loss of yards.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 01-02-2009 at 03:30 AM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 04:47 AM   #27
Grad of BB University
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 19,723
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
As I stated, its my belief that BB gave the carries to Jordan to help showcase him for the free agency period. The reality is that he just didn't run that well except against the Jets and Raiders. Outside those 2 games, Jordan had 57 carries for 204 yards. A 3.5 YPC. I just think BJGE's youth is more of a benefit from a health standpoint.
Gotta disagree with that one, as it makes no sense.. BB would used Jordan over BJGE to showcase him for the freeagency period??.. not sure BB would do anything like this as he always puts the best group on the field with the intent of winning. I think Jordan got the nod over BJGE, because of experience and sure handedness..

Thought Jordan played well, and gave us a different dimension at RB.. love to see this guy come back. BJGE did ok, but not sure he is an answer at RB.
__________________
"Stats are for losers. Final score is for winners." Billl Belichick
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 07:53 AM   #28
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 511
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
You clearly never watched him in college.
Who fing cares about college?

He isnt doing it at the NFL level. Maroney is a fragile dancer.
Triumph is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 07:58 AM   #29
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 568
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
WOW. You know nothing about Maroney. Maroney wasn't a combine guy in any way. And please don't be stupid and claim that he never was the primary back in Minnesota because he was. People point to him splitting carries yet they fail to acknowledge that Minnesota, during his tenure there, ran the ball more than every NFL offense for the 3 years that Maroney was there. And Maroney ran the plays appropriately.

And, really, nothing about Jackson. Go back and do some research about Jackson and you'll find that it took him 2 seasons of playing before it finally clicked for him. Both at the High School and College levels.

The problem with your "evaluations" is that they are knee-jerk and poorly researched. And, as a result, you don't know nearly what you think you do on the players you are commenting on.
Why do you have to stoop to calling people "stupid" just because they disagree with your opinions? This reflects very poorly on your credibility. Believe it or not, sometimes you are wrong, and dissenters are not "stupid", "morons" or "assinine" just because they don't accept all of your beliefs as the gospel. Please leave the name-calling to the genuises on the Jets and Yankee boards. Thank you.
tedylb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2009, 08:55 AM   #30
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
satz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Attleboro,Ma
Posts: 1,314
Default Re: Pats Offseason Review - Offense

Their are weird comments on watson ,he drops balls and need to work on this this year but he has been very good in blocking and really developed that skillset. he must have put in some time and i want him to put same effort catching with his hands.

Against the jets and other teams you can see how fast he is as the LB were not able to stay with him.also putting chad jackson ,bethel johnson with watson who played 837 of 1102 (76 percent) of the snaps this year makes no sense what so ever.
__________________
NFL - A perfect american business model .
HarleyDavidson-Turning gas into noise for more than 100 yrs without the side effects of power and still making a tonne of money a great american business model.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
satz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PATs Offense: 4th and 6th in two stats JR4 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 15 11-11-2008 07:21 PM
Pats @ Bucs preseason game 2 Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 36 08-22-2008 05:00 AM
Off-Season Pre Draft Pre-view: Part 1 (OFFENSE) DaBruinz PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 8 04-23-2007 10:16 AM
Pats Off-season Review (Pre-Free Agency Edition) - Special Teams DaBruinz PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 19 02-14-2007 12:33 AM
Big Risk for Branch - Pat's Offense Produces Big Time Brady'sButtBoy PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 17 08-14-2006 01:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444