ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning [merged]
If you have questions about Curran's report on Sunday, tomorrow may be worth listening to, 6-10 AM.
__________________ Patriots Football... It is what it is!
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
They had Felger and Perillo on this morning - which made for a good show. Still wish they'd ditch D&C for a couple of guys who like talking sports, ie, Perillo and even Felger.
As for Curran's report - I'm sure he'll defend it. It's his job to stand by his material, even if every other outlet (Silver, Breer, King, Reiss, Springer, etc.) has said he's wrong.
Last edited by BradyManny; 12-30-2008 at 09:29 AM..
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344
They had Felger and Perillo on this morning - which made for a good show. Still wish they'd ditch D&C for a couple of guys who like talking sports, ie, Perillo and even Felger.
As for Curran's report - I'm sure he'll defend it. It's his job to stand by his material, even if every other outlet (Silver, Breer, King, Reiss, Springer, etc.) has said he's wrong.
You should win a prize for that post. He will defend that article forever. That's what writers do, whether they are wrong or not. I have no interest in hearing anything either guy has to say. I have developed a serious dislike for all media lately.
Even Mike Reiss.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. AKA "Ladypatsfan"
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344
They had Felger and Perillo on this morning - which made for a good show. Still wish they'd ditch D&C for a couple of guys who like talking sports, ie, Perillo and even Felger.
As for Curran's report - I'm sure he'll defend it. It's his job to stand by his material, even if every other outlet (Silver, Breer, King, Reiss, Springer, etc.) has said he's wrong.
I do think it is funny that both Felger and Perillo have so much disdain for D&C's most BS segment - "Headlines". I think that segment is the most irritating segment of the D&C show for me and usually when it gets to politics, it drags down the rest of the show.
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344
They had Felger and Perillo on this morning - which made for a good show. Still wish they'd ditch D&C for a couple of guys who like talking sports, ie, Perillo and even Felger.
As for Curran's report - I'm sure he'll defend it. It's his job to stand by his material, even if every other outlet (Silver, Breer, King, Reiss, Springer, etc.) has said he's wrong.
I heard it on the way into work. Felger over slept and was 20 minutes late. Hilarious. He must have stayed up celebrating the Pats not making the playoffs.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
Curran was pretty adamant in his story being accurate. I only heard about 20 minutes of them, but I guess he got Schefter to backtrack on his story or something, I dunno. Felger was alluding to it, but of course, Felger loves stirring the pot.
Curran said he was upset with King going on NBC and denying the report and that it was not good for him.
Basically, Curran said Brady's rehab has not really begun and won't until they clear out the scar tissue, putting him behind schedule a total of 16-18 weeks when all is said and done. He also reiterated the loose MCL & ACL will mean he is susceptible to a blowout.
I still don't really buy it. Brady is back in Foxboro and is rehabbing, and has been for quite some time. How that couldn't count towards the rehab process is beyond me. I think it was DaBruinz who said the loose MCL/ACL is expected and desired by the surgeons - ultimately I think Curran probably found the same information, but had someone interpret it wrong for him. He basically called out Shira Springer for writing an article with the same basic facts but coming to a different conclusion, but failed to note that maybe her conclusions were right and his were wrong.
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
Curran made an extremely compelling argument attesting to the veracity of his article.. he never said Brady would not play in '09, only that he was behind schedule..
Cannot repeat it verbatum, but he very politely diminished the credibility of King and Springer..
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Re: FYI--Curran and Felger on WEEI tomorrow morning
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrylS
Curran made an extremely compelling argument attesting to the veracity of his article.. he never said Brady would not play in '09, only that he was behind schedule..
Cannot repeat it verbatum, but he very politely diminished the credibility of King and Springer..
He didn't really say much to diminish King I thought, he was careful about that noting his friendship with King. Springer, he just said they had the same facts but came to different conclusions.
Did you hear the part with Schefter? That's the part I'm most curious about, but unfortunately did not catch.