Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2009, 08:55 AM   #991
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,501
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
Right, and because we have the best QB in the league, we don't need a Ravens-level defense. Hence why we made it to the SB with last year's defense, or how the Colts won the 2006 SB with their defense, or how the Cardinals might very well win this SB with their defense. We just need a *good* defense.

What I was pointing out with the Ravens comparison is that this board is so overwhelmed by fickleness and knee-jerk reactions that it's made real, reasonable discussions rare. We can't have our offense and the Ravens' defense. The Patriots cannot be the absolute best in the league at every aspect of the game. With Brady, this is the best team in the league, and it stands to improve substantially in the draft. Hence the idea of trading Brady being so irrational that it almost seems like rational people should be offended.
You assume because the Ravens, Cardinals, and Steelers were the last teams in the playoffs that we should beat them. What makes you so sure that we would have gotten by Indy, Titans, or the Chargers. I'm not sure we beat the Steelers with our lack of pass rush and corners trying to stay with Ward and Holmes.
Somehow, you have transformed the Patriots defense into a very good one to help your argument that there is no options of trading Brady.
scout is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-27-2009, 07:06 PM   #992
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,406
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by scout View Post
You assume because the Ravens, Cardinals, and Steelers were the last teams in the playoffs that we should beat them. What makes you so sure that we would have gotten by Indy, Titans, or the Chargers. I'm not sure we beat the Steelers with our lack of pass rush and corners trying to stay with Ward and Holmes.
Somehow, you have transformed the Patriots defense into a very good one to help your argument that there is no options of trading Brady.
The Patriots' defense is good enough to win Super Bowls with Tom Brady at QB. The fact that they were minutes away from doing exactly that one year ago being Exhibit A. It is also a good defense; a very good one, even, that was derailed in a major way last year due to season-ending injuries to two of its on-the-field leaders (Thomas and Harrison). A couple of draft picks and free agent signing or two and the defense will be right back where it needs to be.

If anyone's transforming anything, it's you, with your insistence that Belichick suddenly forgot how to scout, draft, coach, and strategize for defense, and that we need to trade the best player in the history of the NFL, for some reason, to clean up after his mess.
BradyFTW! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 07:41 PM   #993
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,501
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
The Patriots' defense is good enough to win Super Bowls with Tom Brady at QB. The fact that they were minutes away from doing exactly that one year ago being Exhibit A. It is also a good defense; a very good one, even, that was derailed in a major way last year due to season-ending injuries to two of its on-the-field leaders (Thomas and Harrison). A couple of draft picks and free agent signing or two and the defense will be right back where it needs to be.

If anyone's transforming anything, it's you, with your insistence that Belichick suddenly forgot how to scout, draft, coach, and strategize for defense, and that we need to trade the best player in the history of the NFL, for some reason, to clean up after his mess.
Its fitting of you to escalate Tom Brady to the greatest player in the history of the NFL.
scout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 11:10 PM   #994
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,406
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by scout View Post
Its fitting of you to escalate Tom Brady to the greatest player in the history of the NFL.
Who's better? At 31, he has 3 SBs, 2 SB MVPs, the single season touchdown record, quarterbacked the highest-scoring offense in NFL history, and has won an MVP.
BradyFTW! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 04:59 PM   #995
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,501
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
Who's better? At 31, he has 3 SBs, 2 SB MVPs, the single season touchdown record, quarterbacked the highest-scoring offense in NFL history, and has won an MVP.
Ah gee, I don't know. I'd have to go with Jim Brown on offense and LT on Defense, although, I'm sure there's a few other players out there that rank pretty high.
BTW, Joe Montana is 4-0 in Superbowls with 3 MVP's, not to say he's better, but based on your rational...............
scout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 05:12 PM   #996
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,341
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
Who's better? At 31, he has 3 SBs, 2 SB MVPs, the single season touchdown record, quarterbacked the highest-scoring offense in NFL history, and has won an MVP.
Yes, and almost every single one of those accomplishments was a team effort.


Do you really think the 50 TDs last year was because of Tom Brady, and not Randy Moss?
Synovia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 05:33 PM   #997
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,542
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOT64 View Post
Agreed with 1,000% - Homers don't see reality

Our defense has had virtually NO SERIOUS pass rusher since Willie Mac left

Our secondary when guys got injured used to be filled in with guys from the streets that contributed enough to keep the offenses in check - Nowadays this secondary has way too many has beens and also-rans to make it a formidable one

Our BIGGEST concern to fill some holes this offseason has to start and probably end with some nice aquisitions to the backfieLd,Which of course is the cornerback position - even Hobbs is not a certified lock on his side IMO.

I expect some FA action and at least 2 picks on draft day to be in the cornerback area and for a good look at a pass rushing specialist,otherwise this team will never win another SB Title in the near future - Brady or no Brady
You sound like a General planning for the LAST war, not the NEXT one. Gee, where did the draft picks for Mayo, Meriwether, Crabel, Wheatly, and Willhite go ? Are these players all newly assigned to the Offense? What about Woods, Redd, and Guyton; are they all just ephemeral Turkeys?
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 05:40 PM   #998
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,147
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synovia View Post
Yes, and almost every single one of those accomplishments was a team effort.


Do you really think the 50 TDs last year was because of Tom Brady, and not Randy Moss?
What other qb has thrown 50 tds in a year?
swheeler23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 05:43 PM   #999
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,542
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel View Post
I stand corrected. I should have said 28%, not $ 28 million on the CAP. What was the CAP in 2003? I don't recall, but it was well under $75 million; and probably more like $50 or $60 million. I do remember people saying the Clots were over 30% of the CAP in QBs. Don't forget to add in Sorgi's or whoever's pittance too.
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 05:45 PM   #1000
In the Starting Line-up
 
ScottieC's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,657
Default Re: The Official 'Trade Brady' Debate Thread - Do Not Start Another One

1000! Lets end it!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Let them all talk - Haters Hate, that's what they do - We have three Lombardi's, how about you?
ScottieC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
brady-cassel comparisons, classic thread

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426