ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nunchucks
With Ed Reed at safety, we would see Talib, McCourty, and Dennard as the three CBs, with Dennard probably being moved to nickel.
Who is the other starting safety?
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Okay, need some help from DB scheming gurus here, but doesn't it make sense to play Mccourty and Reed as two deep safeties. The big LB's mitigate against the need to put a safety in the box, having safeties with outstanding range and/or ability to read the game takes the deep pass away which is what BB wants to achieve anyway and Dennard/Talib/Arrington are good in enough in man to take away the short to intermediate pass.
So I see them playing cover two with Reed/McCourty and man with the Corners. That looks like a very good secondary to me. What's the downside? Not enough of a pass rush? Seams not being covered?
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Whatever move the Pats make in the secondary, I hope it doesn't involve moving Dennard and DMc out of the positions they finished in last year. Dennard has shown more then a few flashes of being very good, just needs some development. And I think reiterating the impact DMc made a safety is redundant now. I love the thought of Reed coming here, But I would more so love to see them get a Bernard Pollard type of SS, because lets admit it, he is the kind of guy you hate when he is on the other team, but just like Rodney if he played for us we would love him. The Pats need someone that put the fear of God into people coming over the middle. Spikes is that guy up front but not 10-15 yards downfield. Were Flacco and the Ravens ate them alive.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601
Okay, need some help from DB scheming gurus here, but doesn't it make sense to play Mccourty and Reed as two deep safeties. The big LB's mitigate against the need to put a safety in the box, having safeties with outstanding range and/or ability to read the game takes the deep pass away which is what BB wants to achieve anyway and Dennard/Talib/Arrington are good in enough in man to take away the short to intermediate pass.
So I see them playing cover two with Reed/McCourty and man with the Corners. That looks like a very good secondary to me. What's the downside? Not enough of a pass rush? Seams not being covered?
One of the reasons having a SS is desired to help the LBs cover the outside runs/tosses/passes to the flat. Rice and Foster were getting big yardage there.
Would love to have an SS (or a CB like Sheldon Brown) jack up some RBs in the flat. Anyone remember this?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Patriots have been overachievers the past two years. It doesn't have the talent to compensate for injuries, and it wins so much because it puts in 99% effort in the regular season and plays with terrific schemes to mask its deficiencies.
But in the playoffs a good team at 99% will not beat emotional, talented teams that play at 100%. It's what happened against the Giants in 2011 and the Ravens in 2012.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601
Okay, need some help from DB scheming gurus here, but doesn't it make sense to play Mccourty and Reed as two deep safeties. The big LB's mitigate against the need to put a safety in the box, having safeties with outstanding range and/or ability to read the game takes the deep pass away which is what BB wants to achieve anyway and Dennard/Talib/Arrington are good in enough in man to take away the short to intermediate pass.
So I see them playing cover two with Reed/McCourty and man with the Corners. That looks like a very good secondary to me. What's the downside? Not enough of a pass rush? Seams not being covered?
Going off this point, I think having two such safeties as you describe will mitigate some of the deficiencies we've seen with our LB pass coverage. I don't think it's a coincidence that in games where Talib/Dennard/McCourty/Gregory lined up, this problem was less glaring. Now imagine that with Reed or some other equivalent...
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer
True, but you are expending cap dollars + a first round pick when you already have a first rounder + second rounder already at the position. I fully support one of the following: drafting Elam/signing Reed/signing Phillips. But I think after that all your other resources have to go into DT/WR/OL/DE/OLB.
Keep in mind that this is a hypothetical dream scenario for me. Let me explain...
I don't think Reed is coming here. I would love to see it happen, but I don't think it will. The reason is that I think he's going to want more money at the age of 35 than what the team will be willing to pay him. That being said, if I'm wrong, I would love to have him. Elam is my binky. IMO, he's the best safety in the draft. He has range, isn't a liability in coverage, is excellent in run support, and can hit. Those two together, with McCourty coming in depending on situation or package, would make this defense a damn hard one to throw on.
It's my opinion that this defense needs to get nasty and physical again if we're going to get Brady another Lombardi. We have that blueprint up front in the front seven with Wilfork, Mayo, Spikes, and Hightower. It's the back end that's still soft. Pulling in Reed while drafting Elam would completely re-tool the safety position and would be one of the best tandems in the NFL. But, like I said, if not Reed, I would gladly take a McCourty/Elam tandem. IMO, their skills play well off each other. Elam takes care of the nitty gritty in run support and McCourty's range makes him a threat for a turnover while being solid against the pass. Add Mathieu to the mix and throw him into the slot and you have three people in the secondary with very nasty dispositions.
As for the offseason/draft, here are the needs I see with only safety being in order of importance...