- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 35,696
- Reaction score
- 7,798
I know this isn't news but here are the numbers :
Brady QB rating :
2006 : Turf 99.9, Grass 72.4
2005 : Turf 108.6, Grass 88.7
2004 : Turf : 109.4, Grass 88.4
Admitedly both numbers are lower this year so it's not a cure all.
Not to be fixated on Manning but he's a good example for comprison :
2006 : Turf : 101.7, Grass 113.8
2005 : Turf 98.2, Grass 115
2004 : Turf 126.7, Grass 112.7
Remarkable, Manning's rating the past two years has been better on grass than turf. This isn't about Brady-Manning, just showing that while Brady is consistently way better on turf, not all QB have the same difference.
Brady QB rating :
2006 : Turf 99.9, Grass 72.4
2005 : Turf 108.6, Grass 88.7
2004 : Turf : 109.4, Grass 88.4
Admitedly both numbers are lower this year so it's not a cure all.
Not to be fixated on Manning but he's a good example for comprison :
2006 : Turf : 101.7, Grass 113.8
2005 : Turf 98.2, Grass 115
2004 : Turf 126.7, Grass 112.7
Remarkable, Manning's rating the past two years has been better on grass than turf. This isn't about Brady-Manning, just showing that while Brady is consistently way better on turf, not all QB have the same difference.