PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Alan Millstein: Brady's chances of en banc hearing dramatically improved with latest amicus filings


Status
Not open for further replies.
OK then on your advice, I will go back to my original belief that, based on your reply, you clearly didn't understand my point.

If you have something intelligent to say in response to the point I made, please feel free to present such.
Why?
 
I don't really follow the NBA, but you are employing the same logic that the people employed when talking about how the Patriots' lack of fumbling "proved" they were cheating.

Fumbles are not a strictly random occurrence so if one team fumbles less than others by a statistically significant amount, that doesn't "prove" anything. Similarly, fouls are not a random occurrence. If one team fouls more than the other by a statistically significant amount, that doesn't "prove" anything.

Please note I'm not saying the accusations are true or untrue, I'm just pointing out the logical flaw at looking at drawing conclusions from statistics.

I'm not using or applying any logic

Donaghy simply stated that "top NBA executives sought to manipulate games using referees"

I can't make it too much clearer than that - though I do understand people's desires to believe that the NBA commissioner is NOT willing to manipulate games to improve his profits

What I can't understand is why everyone would find it so difficult to believe that a Major League Sport would do this. Isn't that effectively what Goodell is doing - effectively trying to, at best, frame Brady to improve parity and the chance of other owners to win, profit, and expand the popularity of the League and profits for all?

It really can't be easy to grow teams, franchises and expand the league when one team is "clogging" up the Super Bowl nearly every other season

So we have a former ref stating this is done in the NBA and we all know it's done in the NFL

It's a little bizarre to me after what we've seen with the NFL to think that some would actually be trying to bend over backwards saying "HEY - Donaghy didn't actually hear Silver say that to them - so we have to assume Silver is completely innocent and how dare you assume otherwise!!!"

REALLY people? Really? After all you've seen in the NFL and KNOWING that the Refs in the NBA can and have altered the outcome of games.

The NBA and NFL both are in a sitution of their own making where the onus is on them to prove they have systems in place that ensure the integrity of the game.

Until they do so the smarter option is to NOT assume Goodell and Silver are honest and fair individuals with "unquestioned integrity"
 
Shamelessly stolen from Twitter:

CmcWQroXEAAaoLg.jpg:large
 
I'm not using or applying any logic

Donaghy simply stated that "top NBA executives sought to manipulate games using referees"

I can't make it too much clearer than that - though I do understand people's desires to believe that the NBA commissioner is NOT willing to manipulate games to improve his profits

What I can't understand is why everyone would find it so difficult to believe that a Major League Sport would do this. Isn't that effectively what Goodell is doing - effectively trying to, at best, frame Brady to improve parity and the chance of other owners to win, profit, and expand the popularity of the League and profits for all?

It really can't be easy to grow teams, franchises and expand the league when one team is "clogging" up the Super Bowl nearly every other season

So we have a former ref stating this is done in the NBA and we all know it's done in the NFL

It's a little bizarre to me after what we've seen with the NFL to think that some would actually be trying to bend over backwards saying "HEY - Donaghy didn't actually hear Silver say that to them - so we have to assume Silver is completely innocent and how dare you assume otherwise!!!"

REALLY people? Really? After all you've seen in the NFL and KNOWING that the Refs in the NBA can and have altered the outcome of games.

The NBA and NFL both are in a sitution of their own making where the onus is on them to prove they have systems in place that ensure the integrity of the game.

Until they do so the smarter option is to NOT assume Goodell and Silver are honest and fair individuals with "unquestioned integrity"
Must be why Goodell is saying Integrity all the time, trying to brainwash the weak minded :).
 
I'm not using or applying any logic
Yes I agree you are not employing any logic but it is clear you are trying to.

You're trying to apply statistical probability to the number of fouls in that 4th quarter and claim that there is a statistically significant difference between the two teams' fouls, therefore the game was fixed. There's is no logical connection in that statement, just like there is no logic in the statement "the Patriots lose fumbles at an incredibly low rate, therefore they are cheating."
Donaghy simply stated that "top NBA executives sought to manipulate games using referees"
Donaghy is a known degenerate lowlife POS sleazeball. Even people who believe him cannot deny that fact. Believing Donaghy would be like believing Pete Rose.
What I can't understand is why everyone would find it so difficult to believe that a Major League Sport would do this.
It is too great of a risk. These teams are worth countless billions. You wouldn't risk it all for a game 7.
Isn't that effectively what Goodell is doing - effectively trying to, at best, frame Brady to improve parity and the chance of other owners to win, profit, and expand the popularity of the League and profits for all?
Separate matter. We are talking about league offices using referees to rig the outcomes of certain games in a predetermined fashion.
It really can't be easy to grow teams, franchises and expand the league when one team is "clogging" up the Super Bowl nearly every other season
Dynasties are good for a sport. Having a team or player that everyone hates is wonderful for ratings.
 
So this deflategate ruling may take a while....

 
If that is true then maybe Judge Katzmann thinks this will be helpful to Brady's side.

Honestly, i thought the judges were polled by now...oh well, let katzmann work his magic.
 
Last edited:
Honestly i thought the judges were polled by now...oh well, let katzmann work his magic.

And maybe - like Judge Berman - he sees and understands what is really happening here so maybe he is very quietly and subtly doing what he can to make sure justice is done. Hope so.
 
So this deflategate ruling may take a while....


A separate article by Wallach states one of the guys is taking senior status on August 1st and the other sometime "this summer."

My own observation is that would mean Brady needs 6 of 11 instead of 7 of 13. The only way waiting helps Brady is if they both were planning to vote against the appeal. If they split 1-1 then their presence doesn't make a difference and, needless to say, if they both support Brady then we don't want to wait for them to leave the panel.

Wallach also had this interesting nugget: If the en banc hearing is granted, then the 3-judge appeal hearing ruling is completely dismissed. What this means is that if there are an even number of judges on the en banc panel, all Brady needs is a 50-50 split. A 50-50 split means Berman's original decision is upheld, NOT the appeals court decision. I honestly didn't know that.

Of course, if there are 12 judges rehearing the appeal, we already know we're down 2-1, so we need 5 of the remaining 9.
 
A separate article by Wallach states one of the guys is taking senior status on August 1st and the other sometime "this summer."

My own observation is that would mean Brady needs 6 of 11 instead of 7 of 13. The only way waiting helps Brady is if they both were planning to vote against the appeal. If they split 1-1 then their presence doesn't make a difference and, needless to say, if they both support Brady then we don't want to wait for them to leave the panel.

Wallach also had this interesting nugget: If the en banc hearing is granted, then the 3-judge appeal hearing ruling is completely dismissed. What this means is that if there are an even number of judges on the en banc panel, all Brady needs is a 50-50 split. A 50-50 split means Berman's original decision is upheld, NOT the appeals court decision. I honestly didn't know that.

Of course, if there are 12 judges rehearing the appeal, we already know we're down 2-1, so we need 5 of the remaining 9.

Yes, tie goes to Brady
 
Assuming Brady's team does all the stuff people have said they would do, including going to SCOTUS, is there really any chance that Brady sits out the 4 games this season? The timing is getting really tight, at this point.
 
Assuming Brady's team does all the stuff people have said they would do, including going to SCOTUS, is there really any chance that Brady sits out the 4 games this season? The timing is getting really tight, at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


MORSE: Patriots QB Drake Maye Analysis and What to Expect in Round 2 and 3
Five Patriots/NFL Thoughts Following Night One of the 2024 NFL Draft
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/26: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots QB Drake Maye Conference Call
Patriots Now Have to Get to Work After Taking Maye
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf and Jerod Mayo After Patriots Take Drake Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Back
Top