I think a shutout is very unlikely. The Pats defense can't hope to keep the Giants out the game, much less off the scoreboard.
Also, Brady will face a great pass rush. We'll see how he adjusts. Giants are a solid team but beatable; it's going to take a good effort on both sides of the ball...
This is a disingenuous post. His team was decimated with injuries for most of last season--him included--so the fact that they pulled it together and won the Super Bowl is a credit to Rodgers as a leader. Never mind that he's played at a consistently high level during that time frame to present...
I've seen Cambell twice and Sanchez twice. Cambell played stupid against the Patriots. I can't see, in all his faults, Sanchez throwing either of those picks Cambell near hand delivered to the Pats right now.
I don't have complete information. Most of this is intuition and opinion. I'm not...
This is a step in the right direction. Although I would also partition stats within certain timeframes (through seasons, playoffs, win streaks, etc), correct for strength of competition, pretty much watch film and break down games, measure release time, throw in Rodgers' running stats/ability...
Nah, the most dependent position on the field is wide receiver.
The margin of error (or differential) between statistic like TDs, passing yards and completion percentage is much smaller than that of broad, general stats like streaks over a certain amount of games or other stress factors, and...
He isn't. He's competent. Though, I think Sanchez is competent. I also think the Jets would be undefeated if they had the Skins' schedule so far. But the metric was "definitely worse than Sanchez" and I think the two are a wash.
I could buy that this season, but I was basing it on last year. That's why I had the disclaimer in there.
True. It would take much more consideration than what I presented to disregard it completely. But it's enough to knock it down from bullet point status, because it's not logically sound...
I'm not ready to put McCoy or Dalton over Sanchez. Smith either. Bradford isn't playing better either, although the potential is there. But I don't count potential. Cambell is the epitome of terrible. And I would take Sanchez over the aforementioned (in bold), so I came to nine.
I touched on this very thing in the third paragraph.
I don't think it makes the argument for QBs, because it relies on the logical premise that wins and points come because the QB is playing well, which is not always the case. So the logic is flawed.
A more apt streak would be consecutive...
Your first point is all nice and well, except for the fact Rodgers too is putting up ridiculous passing numbers, and has the added fact that he's not useless if he can't pass the ball.
Redzone TD/INT efficiency is nice, but it's a technical stat, because I can think of at least two INTs he...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.