Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat. - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > More Pats Forums > The Practice Squad
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree4Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2012, 08:59 AM   #11
In the Starting Line-up
 
Haley's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Boonies, MA
Posts: 2,085
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Get ready to have your odds defied!

5 more hours ... 5 more hours ... 5 more hours ... 5 more hours ... GO PATS!
Haley is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-22-2012, 09:02 AM   #12
In the Starting Line-up
 
robbomango's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: living in Oregon grew up in Revere MA
Posts: 2,428
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

......................
Attached Images
 
BoTown likes this.
robbomango is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:03 AM   #13
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 96
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patradomous View Post
teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.

Just sayin
Well, in 2004/05 the Patriots scored 41 against the Steelers, then played the Eagles who had scored 27 in both their playoff games and we know how that came out. So perhaps this doesn't apply to the Patriots (straight up at least)?
Double TE likes this.

Last edited by Trocadile; 01-22-2012 at 09:04 AM..
Trocadile is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:12 AM   #14
In the Starting Line-up
 
Patradomous's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,084
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Nobody wants them to win more than I do.
This forum is loaded with stats of every sort.
I'm just posting one that does not bode well for our Pats if it holds up.
I like to bet for amusment only.I am betting Balt. +7 hoping the Pats win by 6. I was 4-1 last week using certain playoff trends.

By the way here is another trend for you teams in the playoffs who beat SB champs don't cover the next week. SF is my other play.
Patradomous is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:14 AM   #15
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,646
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patradomous View Post
teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.

Just sayin
Are you a numerologist?

__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT

Last edited by RayClay; 01-22-2012 at 09:17 AM..
RayClay is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:15 AM   #16
In the Starting Line-up
 
aluminum seats's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,371
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Even with the understanding that stats can be parsed in an infinite number of ways, this if comic. Over 38 points...under 28 points...seriously? Meaningless isn't even the right word for that, because it has "meaning" in it. Yeesh.
__________________
"So I'm going to throw myself against the wall...
'Cause I'd rather feel bad than not feel anything at all."
aluminum seats is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:17 AM   #17
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 413
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

That stat is terrifying. I just have a terrible sinking feeling about this game. I feel like everything's gonna go wrong, we won't be able to move the ball, and Flacco will hit some deep balls and we can't stop Rice. I felt so confident earlier in the week too.

It just feels like it's the soft high powered offensive team vs the tough strong defensive team, and most of the time the tough defensive team wins out. At least, that's how it was earlier in the decade when it was us vs the Colts. I feel like the Ravens are what we used to be, and we've turned into the Colts. I really hope they prove me wrong.

Last edited by BradyToHernandez; 01-22-2012 at 09:21 AM..
BradyToHernandez is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:20 AM   #18
In the Starting Line-up
 
Haley's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Boonies, MA
Posts: 2,085
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patradomous View Post
Nobody wants them to win more than I do.
This forum is loaded with stats of every sort.
I'm just posting one that does not bode well for our Pats if it holds up.
I like to bet for amusment only.I am betting Balt. +7 hoping the Pats win by 6. I was 4-1 last week using certain playoff trends.

By the way here is another trend for you teams in the playoffs who beat SB champs don't cover the next week. SF is my other play.
The point is there is no such thing as a stat that dictates the outcome of a game. We play the games for a reason, no one knows how they will turn out.

I don't know much about the stat you posted. But I do know the 2011 Patriots. They play hard and clutch. They are winners.

If I were you I'd get mentally prepared for a possible victory in either direction, because anything can happen, but hope for the best! Don't worry so much about stats. They are just numbers and no one could possibly reduce this team of warriors to numeric equations except maybe this guy:


4 1/2 hours .... 4 1/2 hours ... 4 1/2 hours ... GO PATS!
Haley is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:27 AM   #19
In the Starting Line-up
 
Patradomous's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,084
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Well here is another stat thats not so abstract.

Ravens are 12-0 straight up when they score 17 or more points.This year.

I posted earlier this week that for Pats to win they've got keep balt under 24 points.

I'm hoping the Pats D can pull off what the Indy D did in 2006.

Ravens barely beat Houston last week after winning the TO battle 4 or 5 to nothing.
This is not going to be an easy game buckle in.

Last edited by Patradomous; 01-22-2012 at 09:29 AM..
Patradomous is offline  
Old 01-22-2012, 09:29 AM   #20
Banned
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,114
Default Re: Not what we are looking for. Horrorfying stat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patradomous View Post
teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.

Just sayin
When I read that stat it sounded a bit far fetched, aside from the fact that it is worded in a very vague manner. Sure enough I did some checking and the record they give for SU doesn't hold true. Since 1990, by my calculations, teams that fit that criteria are 8-10. Now I may be off by a game or two since I simply did a quick check, but I'm sure as heck not off by 10.

Last edited by Wolfpack; 01-22-2012 at 09:40 AM..
Wolfpack is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the stat for this? Patradomous PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 01-21-2008 01:17 AM
Another bad stat drew4008 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 24 11-12-2005 12:21 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC