kudzif

Does the game end after the first quarter ?. I keep hearing people say they would have lost because they were down 14 and if RGIII was healthy. I guess the colts should have lost the 2006 AFCCG. Also injuries are part of the game so everyone who keeps mentioning RGIII 's injury its irrelevant. If Gronk was not injured i'm convinced we beat the Giant's in the Superbowl but last time i checked nobody cares because its football and injuries happen.

JackBauer

Not sure if I agree with that.

KontradictioN

I like what you're doing here. So, if I have this straight, should the Patriots cruise to a two score lead, have Brady sustain an injury where it's clear that he shouldn't be playing or it takes him out of the game, and the Patriots lose 24-14 after their offense can't move the ball, then the injury is irrelevant? Explain this logic to me.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian

Deus Irae

Not one person here has said that the Seahawks didn't win in the sense of which team is moving on in the playoffs, so you're not really making any point here.

__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius

JackBauer

The issue wasn't that RG3 got injured. It's that he got injured and the coaching staff not only inexplicably insisted on keeping him in but kept calling plays that should have only been called with a healthy QB under center.

kudzif

You do realize Seattle was down 13 against us this season and they came back to beat us and last time i checked Tom Brady did not get injuired. Teams are allowed to make in game adjustments.

robertweathers

Fair enough...

John Harbaugh > Pete
Jim Harbaugh > Pete
BB > Pete
McCarthy > Pete

I think Fox is better but with PM as a QB that makes him better. I also think he got blood out of stone last year and I thought he got royally screwed over in Carolina by ownership who IMO, are the ones that hamstrung him and ran that franchise into the ground.

I think Mike Smith is a very good coach and is better than Pete. But, he doesn't have the playoff success to back that up.

Kubiak...well, considering the job Petey did in SEA this may be a tie. Can't make an argument I guess for Pete > Kubiak.

__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick

JackBauer

I think John Harbaugh is a bit overrated. I'd probably take Carroll over Fox, not sure about Smith. Probably take Pete over Kubiak, too.

JackBauer

Can you tell us what that has to do with the Redskins/Seahawks game?

TyronePoole

this and Pete>>>>McCarthy imo