Broncos: Easiest path to the #1 seed ever? - Page 71 - New England Patriots Forums

***BananaRepublican*** · 01-04-2013, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archeryaddict12

Manning ain't that good, that's why Brady has more SB appearances and wins.

Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.

This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.

PatsWSB47 · 01-04-2013, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BananaRepublican

Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.

This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.

Comments like that prove he's just here to troll. How he's not banned yet is beyond me. I just put him on ignore.

BroncoPower · 01-04-2013, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetssuck

The point is that the Denver offense is talented enough even without Manning to be successful in different offensive systems. That they could still be successful without Manning is the equivalent of your point that the Patriots could be successful without Brady. Understood?

The fundamental difference is that tebow pretty much made our passing game and recievers non existent. Look at our recievers numbers and passing yds compared to last season. At least casell was/is a semi good QB with passing ability.

BroncoPower · 01-04-2013, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetssuck

The Patriots went from 18-1 with Brady in 2007 to 11-5 with Matt Cassel in 2008. That's 7 fewer wins. The Colts went from 10-7 with Manning in 2010 to 2-14 with Mo, Larry, and Curly. That's 8 fewer wins. A total win difference of only 1.

Omg what the hell are you talking about haha?

Jetssuck · 01-04-2013, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoPower

The fundamental difference is that tebow pretty much made our passing game and recievers non existent. Look at our recievers numbers and passing yds compared to last season. At least casell was/is a semi good QB with passing ability.

Thomas had 200 yards receiving in the wildcard playoff game against Pitt. Only a very talented WR could ever have such a game. The fact that it is was Tebow throwing to him makes it all the more amazing.

I agree Cassel was for a little while/is a semi-good QB, thus the 11-5 season against a very weak schedule in 2008.

Archeryaddict12 · 01-04-2013, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BananaRepublican

Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.

This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.

Haha your funny. Might as well up my post count with him. I can go way deeper. What I find funny is how someone calls a QB a system qb. Yeah we look at a QB but the ravens won by their D in 2000, you have to be good in all 3 phase with playmakers. That's what every Super Bowl team has. It proves if you have the D and a guy with talented receivers you don't need a excellent QB. But when you have a excellent QB in our case you don't need a strong D. Now Denver has a great QB but not one that can get it done during prime time. And now he has a team with a good D and O. So they have done good but now its the playoffs. Brady has proven to be a super elite Q that can carry us at times.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jetssuck · 01-04-2013, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoPower

Omg what the hell are you talking about haha?

How hard could it be to understand. The drop off in wins was basically the same in the Patriots without Brady and the Colts without Manning.

The Pats in 2008 had 7 fewer wins without Brady than the previous year with Brady. The Colts in 2011 had 8 fewer wins without Manning than the previous year with Manning.

Jetssuck · 01-04-2013, 11:16 PM

Patriots 18-1 to 11-5

Colts 10-7 to 2-14

***Deus Irae*** · 01-04-2013, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetssuck

Patriots 18-1 to 11-5

Colts 10-7 to 2-14

BroncoPower · 01-04-2013, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetssuck

How hard could it be to understand. The drop off in wins was basically the same in the Patriots without Brady and the Colts without Manning.

The Pats in 2008 had 7 fewer wins without Brady than the previous year with Brady. The Colts in 2011 had 8 fewer wins without Manning than the previous year with Manning.

Lay off the crack man.