ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Manning ain't that good, that's why Brady has more SB appearances and wins.
Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.
This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
The point is that the Denver offense is talented enough even without Manning to be successful in different offensive systems. That they could still be successful without Manning is the equivalent of your point that the Patriots could be successful without Brady. Understood?
The fundamental difference is that tebow pretty much made our passing game and recievers non existent. Look at our recievers numbers and passing yds compared to last season. At least casell was/is a semi good QB with passing ability.
The Patriots went from 18-1 with Brady in 2007 to 11-5 with Matt Cassel in 2008. That's 7 fewer wins. The Colts went from 10-7 with Manning in 2010 to 2-14 with Mo, Larry, and Curly. That's 8 fewer wins. A total win difference of only 1.
The fundamental difference is that tebow pretty much made our passing game and recievers non existent. Look at our recievers numbers and passing yds compared to last season. At least casell was/is a semi good QB with passing ability.
Thomas had 200 yards receiving in the wildcard playoff game against Pitt. Only a very talented WR could ever have such a game. The fact that it is was Tebow throwing to him makes it all the more amazing.
I agree Cassel was for a little while/is a semi-good QB, thus the 11-5 season against a very weak schedule in 2008.
Denver guy says Brady would stink on any other team and Pats guy says Manning ain't that good.
This is classic. Epic even. The lizard brain has been activated.
Haha your funny. Might as well up my post count with him. I can go way deeper. What I find funny is how someone calls a QB a system qb. Yeah we look at a QB but the ravens won by their D in 2000, you have to be good in all 3 phase with playmakers. That's what every Super Bowl team has. It proves if you have the D and a guy with talented receivers you don't need a excellent QB. But when you have a excellent QB in our case you don't need a strong D. Now Denver has a great QB but not one that can get it done during prime time. And now he has a team with a good D and O. So they have done good but now its the playoffs. Brady has proven to be a super elite Q that can carry us at times.
How hard could it be to understand. The drop off in wins was basically the same in the Patriots without Brady and the Colts without Manning.
The Pats in 2008 had 7 fewer wins without Brady than the previous year with Brady. The Colts in 2011 had 8 fewer wins without Manning than the previous year with Manning.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
How hard could it be to understand. The drop off in wins was basically the same in the Patriots without Brady and the Colts without Manning.
The Pats in 2008 had 7 fewer wins without Brady than the previous year with Brady. The Colts in 2011 had 8 fewer wins without Manning than the previous year with Manning.
216Likes
Re: Broncos: Easiest path to the #1 seed ever?
Linear Mode
