The 1/8/11 Wild Card thread Saints vs Seahawks - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > NFL Football Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2011, 12:44 PM   #11
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,198
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Go ahead and laugh at Seattle Seahawks, because stranger teams have won it all - ESPN

A few nuggets from this article:

Quote:
Guess what? We don't care. The stadium will be sold out for Saturday's game against the Saints, with Seahawks fans going crazy waving their lime green towels. It will be louder than an Iron Maiden concert from 1985. And just to rub it in everyone's faces, we hope it rains so hard that Drew Brees will think the footballs were soaked in Puget Sound.

Let me put it another way: We laugh at your criticism. Consider that for the better part of three decades, our professional sports teams have choked, gagged, disappointed, crushed our hearts, underperformed, stunk, been screwed by the refs and then by a no-good slickster from Oklahoma who stole our beloved basketball franchise. So, no, your indignation does not bother us; the way we look at is that we're four wins away from a Super Bowl celebration.
Quote:
Here's another thing: Why not rally around the Seahawks? Isn't this the type of storyline we're supposed to embrace, the underdog overcoming incalculable odds to shock the world (not to mention the pundits)? In an NFL season in which the major plot lines were Brett Favre's return, Brett Favre's private parts, Michael Vick, the NFL's investigation of Brett Favre, concussions, Brett Favre's injuries, Rex Ryan's wife's toes, Brett Favre's fine and Brett Favre's impending retirement, here's an actual feel-good story without revolting undertones. It's a lot more interesting than rooting for yet more success from Tom Brady or Peyton Manning, that's for sure (not to mention the twin pariahs of shame, Vick and Ben Roethlisberger).
jmt57 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-07-2011, 01:12 PM   #12
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,633
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Seahawks fans are delirious if they think their team will advance very far in the big Tourney. First of all their QB is Matt Hasselbeck. Second of all their QB is Matt Hasselbeck. Third of all their head coach is Pete Carroll. Any questions? I tip my hats off to them for making it this far but I don't see the Seahawks getting out of this game with the W no less the Superbowl.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!
VJCPatriot is online now  
Old 01-07-2011, 01:36 PM   #13
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,283
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Being a double digit favor over one team is an EPIC jinx. Everything is telling me that this game won't be close, but the Saints don't have much of a running game (if any running game at all) and the Seattle secondary really isn't that bad. It wouldn't shock me if the Saints don't cover.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 01-07-2011, 01:44 PM   #14
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,633
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN View Post
Being a double digit favor over one team is an EPIC jinx. Everything is telling me that this game won't be close, but the Saints don't have much of a running game (if any running game at all) and the Seattle secondary really isn't that bad. It wouldn't shock me if the Saints don't cover.
I'm sure that bettors who bet the under will be delighted it that's the case. But it will be little consolation for the Seahawks and their fans when they lose, whether it be by 1 point or by 20. It's not impossible for the Seahawks to win obviously. It just appears highly improbable, even accouting for the Saints loss of 2 RBs.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!
VJCPatriot is online now  
Old 01-07-2011, 01:45 PM   #15
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
FSUPatsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 724
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

It's funny to think that the 10.5 points the Seahawks are getting at home is pretty much the same line to the 2001 Superbowl. I believe the '01 superbowl was 13.5 points. Vegas usually gives 3 points for homefield advantage.

So, Vegas thought the '01 Patriots had about the same chance of beating the '01 Rams as the Seahawks do of winning this weekend.
FSUPatsFan is offline  
Old 01-07-2011, 02:16 PM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
weswelker#83's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Winthrop,ma
Posts: 4,503
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks


New Orleans Saints Given First-Round Bye

The Onion




Source:
New Orleans Saints Given First-Round Bye | The Onion Sports Network
weswelker#83 is offline  
Old 01-08-2011, 12:55 PM   #17
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,198
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Seahawks | Can Seahawks pull off upset of Saints? | Seattle Times Newspaper
Quote:
The city has spent the better part of the week talking itself into the fact that these Seahawks — the biggest home underdogs in NFL playoff history — have a chance.

The New Orleans Saints might be the defending Super Bowl champions but their top two rushers this season — Chris Ivory and Pierre Thomas — are out for the year. Not only that, but the Saints play their home games in a dome and the forecast is calling for rain Saturday, maybe even snow.

So it's starting to add up, right? The Saints could come out and lay an egg, quarterback Drew Brees could end up rattled by everything from the elements to the crowd noise.

This wild-card playoff game won't come down to what New Orleans can't do. It's going to be decided by what Seattle can accomplish.

Can Hasselbeck dissect New Orleans' defense like he did on Nov. 21, passing for 366 yards? Can Seattle's defense — so malleable for the past two months — be as staunch as it was against St. Louis on Sunday?

Seattle is a team with a coach in his first year reshaping the franchise, a quarterback in the final year of his contract and a possibility of knocking the NFL on its ear by beating the reigning champs.

The Saints are ranked No. 6 in yards gained, the Seahawks are 28th. New Orleans has allowed the fourth-fewest yards in the league, Seattle has given up the sixth most.

Keep it close. That is Seattle's first priority in this game and perhaps the biggest challenge. These are the Saints we're talking about, who rang up 30 or more points in five of the past eight games this season, and not only that, but only two of Seattle's 16 regular-season games were decided by fewer than 10 points.


Seahawks | So you're saying there's a chance | Seattle Times Newspaper
Quote:
Playoff games often come down to the ground game. Who can run the ball effectively, and whose defense can stonewall the opponent? Well, no one is going to accuse Seattle of being overly competent in either department, but over the final five regular-season games, the Seahawks gained more rushing yards than the Saints (567 to 483) while also allowing fewer rushing yards (579 to 599).


Jerry Brewer | In a short time, the Seahawks have come a long way | Seattle Times Newspaper
Quote:
This way isn't supposed to work, but it did. Thanks to the putrid NFC West, the 7-9 Seahawks are division champions again, and Saturday afternoon, even if they get their shoulder pads blown off them, they'll be better for this playoff experience.

You've spent the week trying to convince yourself that the home team can shock the New Orleans Saints and the entire pigskin nation, or you've been fearing that this Rodney Dangerfield city will be mocked if the Seahawks get destroyed. Really, though, this game is about more than the dominant story line of a supposed unworthy challenger trying to pull off the impossible upset. Of more significance is the fact that, because of this improbable playoff berth, the Seahawks can now be considered way ahead of schedule as they remodel this team.

Just a year ago, the Seahawks were an aging team with too many overpriced veterans who didn't play with the requisite energy, toughness and speed to win in the NFL. They were the worst brand of team for this league, one desperately clinging to a successful recent past, one that used nostalgia to make too many decisions, one ignorant of the reality that their peers had passed by them two years earlier.

Some may look at the Seahawks, notice this is their first playoff appearance in three years and conclude it has taken them a long time to come a short way. In truth, however, it's just the opposite: In a short time, the Seahawks have come a long way.

This is Year 1 for the new management team, and it operates in a manner fully dissimilar to the old one. To understand how far from dominant Carroll and Co. believe the Seahawks are, you need only to look at the more than 270 player transactions they've made this season. They've done all of that to turn over about 60 percent of this roster, mostly employing inexperienced players. Despite all the change and youth, here they are, basking in this win-or-go-home environment.
jmt57 is offline  
Old 01-08-2011, 12:58 PM   #18
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,198
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Oops. (YouTube video included in link.)

Seahawks Blog | Fill me up: Qwest beer controversy | Seattle Times Newspaper
Quote:
"We received a copy of the YouTube video showing the quantity of liquid served in the 16 oz. beer cup is the same quantity that fits into the 20 oz. beer cup. This is the first time we have been alerted to this fact. Upon our internal investigation this afternoon, we discovered the cups that are marked 16 oz. hold 20 oz. of liquid. Fans who purchased a 16 oz. beer actually received 20 oz. of beer for the 16 oz. price. Fans that purchased the 20 oz. beer received the amount they purchased. We are working with Levy Restaurants to follow up with the cup vendor about the measurement and to determine how long this has been occurring at Qwest Field. We are determined to find a solution as quickly as possible. In the meantime, we will serve domestic beer in the 20 oz. cup at tomorrow's playoff game to ensure all fans receive the amount they purchase, and we will charge the 16 oz. price."
jmt57 is offline  
Old 01-08-2011, 12:59 PM   #19
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,644
My Mood: Devilish
Default The 1/8/11 Wild Card thread Saints vs Seahawks

I thought that is would be good to have ONE thread to post your comments on the Wild Card games today. That could save several OT threads regarding the game.

I'll try to start another before the Colts but if someone else wants to put one up around 6-6:30 please go ahead.

By all rights the Saints should win this one. But that's why they play the games. Remember the AZ Cardinals and their awful regular season record making the SB. That was the same year that the Patriots had an 11-5 record, 2 more wins, and stayed home.
PATSNUTme is offline  
Old 01-08-2011, 01:16 PM   #20
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,198
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: NFL Wild Card: Saints at Seahawks

Inside the game: New Orleans Saints at Seattle Seahawks wild-card playoff game | NOLA.com
Quote:
SAINTS KICKING GAME VS. LEON WASHINGTON
Although Washington's 25.6 kickoff return average did not lead the NFL (he was eighth), there isn't a more explosive returner deep on the kickoff.

Against San Diego, Washington became the first player in 50 years to average better than 60 yards per return, gaining 253 yards on four returns, including a 101-yard touchdown and a 99-yard touchdown. He added a 92-yard touchdown return against San Francisco in week 13.

The Saints did a good job of containing Washington last time, as the Seahawks' average starting field position of their own 23-yard line was the second-worst the team had this season.

Payton indicated that, with a dangerous return man, the Saints sometimes favor Garrett Hartley kicking off because he can place the ball on a spot better than Thomas Morstead, who has the leg to kick it deeper. But McMahon, trying to keep his options open, said Hartley got the call most often against Seattle in November because Morstead was coping with a since-healed hip flexor.

MARSHAWN LYNCH VS. REGGIE BUSH
The weather is expected to be vintage Seattle rain and cold, with a sky the gray of the Seahawks uniforms. So even though both offenses favor a passing attack, one of them -- most likely the winner -- will have to establish some sort of running game, if only to keep the defense honest and make play action more effective.

With Pierre Thomas and Chris Ivory out, Bush will be called upon to not only gain positive yardage consistently in the running game, but also provide a threat as a pass receiver coming out of the backfield, one of the Saints staples, especially in the red zone.

Julius Jones' fumble on the goal line last week against Tampa Bay could mean the team leans on Bush even more in the red zone today.

SAINTS SECONDARY VS. MATT HASSELBECK
Seattle seemingly abandoned any pretense of trying to run the ball when they visited New Orleans, opting instead to have Hasselbeck throw 44 times. He completed 32 for 366 yards and a touchdown, earning a quarterback rating of 104.9, his third-highest of the season. "You can look at it that way if you want to," Saints cornerback Tracy Porter said, when asked it the secondary hoped for some payback today.

"Regardless, we gave up over 300 yards passing and 400 yards total offense to those guys, and that's something we don't pride ourselves on doing."

Hasselbeck is particularly effective in the red zone, where he has amassed a touchdown/interception ratio of 117 to 13 since 2001. With Saints safety Malcolm Jenkins out, there will be more pressure on Porter and Jabari Greer on the corners, as well as whoever New Orleans puts in the slot.

Rookie Patrick Robinson has been playing well the past two weeks on special teams, but it would not be surprising to see defensive coordinator Gregg Williams opt instead for the deeper experience of Leigh Torrence and Pierson Prioleau.

GAME PLAN
The Saints aren't likely to overhaul their offensive approach radically, even without Thomas, Ivory and rookie Jimmy Graham, who has emerged as New Orleans' most potent threat at tight end. That means the passing game will be more important than ever. Quarterback Drew Brees probably will try to get wide receiver Marques Colston involved early, as he tends to be a player who gets better as a game progresses and he is frequently targeted. Colston's reliability will have to be matched by tight end Jeremy Shockey, and that will give Brees a chance to take shot plays with Lance Moore and Robert Meachem. Conversely, possibly weakened Hasselbeck, a strong Lynch and bad weather could mean Seattle will try to slow the game down and grind out first downs. Surely the Seahawks know they must limit the Saints' possessions to keep the game close into the second half.
jmt57 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wild Card Prediction Thread - Who Plays On? Who Goes Home? PATRIOTSFANINPA PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 38 01-11-2010 02:33 PM
Official Jaguars/Ravens game thread...wild card berth on the line ALP PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 40 12-28-2008 04:53 PM
Who do you like this weekend? - The wild card round predictions thread PATRIOTSFANINPA PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 22 01-06-2008 04:36 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563