TheSolderKing

Might as well start it b/c someone will eventually...

I want to know who was for or against him being a Patriot.

I personally did not want to waste a rd. 1 pick on a RB b/c there is great value in later rounds. There is no question he has immense talent, but did we play it right? After the Maroney catastrophe I have been against RB's in rd. 1. here is my stance... how do you feel about the Ingram situation?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

ausbacker

One game into a player's career is not a long enough observation period.

supafly

I won't lie. I wanted him, and was an advocate of the NEP's 'perceived' interest in him. (which may/may not have been a smokescreen)

But the value was obviously there in later rounds, as we all knew. Hopefully one of the two we picked up will contribute just fine, although only time will tell whether or not passing on Ingram was the right move.

I don't mind the added high pick, that's for sure.

__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....

livinginthe past

I love the justification for this thread.

"Oh well, its 'inevitable' so I might aswell do it myself".

Its inevitable, but only because you appear to have the attention span of a goldfish.

__________________
"I gave George Allen an unlimited budget", Edward Bennett, the principal owner of the Redskins, said a few weeks after hiring Allen, "and he's already exceeded it."

TheSolderKing

*sigh


you do NOT need a huge sample of games to answer this question.

you either wanted him or not and please explain why you chose your move


what is a better time to start this thread than at the start of the season?

don't hate. jeez

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

ausbacker

I'm fairly certain you do.

Kid~Brady

Well, he played against one of the top defenses in the league his first game and ran the ball well. I think that speaks for itself.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

TheSolderKing

I agree. I do realize for us to surmise a true evaluation of Ingram it will take time (years) perhaps, but this thread is a simple yes or no on Ingram being drafted by us.

I found a lot of value in the later rounds and many of the solid RB's do not need to be drafted in the 1st rd. We for the most part carry 2 1's to maximize value of future drafts when we trade it for a future 1 and some more.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The-Hooded-One

I think it looks like Ridley can be just as good if not better.

Uncle Rico

Hey -- no fair jumping the gun on the inevitable Tuesday thread.

__________________
"If they sought to intimidate us, to terrorize us, to shake us from ... the values that make us who we are, as Americans -- well, it should be pretty clear by now that they picked the wrong city to do it. Not here in Boston. Not here in Boston."
—President Barack Obama, April 18, 2013



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.