Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
I get the appeal at first glance, he has that height, weight, speed that BB mentioned a few years back, but has anyone really watched him play?
I watched 3 games of his this year.(Iowa, USC, and OKie ST.)
The Iowa game showed that he had some raw potential and a prospect for the Patriots, but the USC and OK. St game also showed that he has a lot of work to do.
Right now, he is a one trick pony with a limited skillset in that role. He is a pass rush specialist without any pass rush moves. He has a good first step, but he either trys to speed rush to the outside(and does not have great bend when doing that) or he tries to bull rush.
In the bowl game they ran at him all day long and he was lost out there trying to set the edge. I came away unimpressed and thought he would be a good mid-round pick to try and develop.
On top of that, he admitted himself that he played a very simplistic role in college and has to learn schemes. I just do not trust taking a guy high that is so far behind in basic football knowledge.
Finally, as a guy who admitted that his only job was to rush the QB, to have a career high of 8 his sophomore year is concerning to me as well. For a guy who is going to have to transition to another position and learn from scratch new responsibilities, how many sacks can we expect from him in the NFL?
Reed just doesn't seem like a BB type pick unless that pick is made in the 3rd round or later. I cannot get on board with people wanting him at 28 or 33.
What am I missing here? am I wrong?
Last edited by midwestpatsfan; 03-18-2011 at 09:04 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by midwestpatsfan
I get the appeal at first glance, he has that height, weight, speed that BB mentioned a few years back, but has anyone really watched him play?
I watched 3 games of his this year.(Iowa, USC, and OKie ST.)
The Iowa game showed that he had some raw potential and a prospect for the Patriots, but the USC and OK. St game also showed that he has a lot of work to do.
Right now, he is a one trick pony with a limited skillset in that role. He is a pass rush specialist without any pass rush moves. He has a good first step, but he either trys to speed rush to the outside(and does not have great bend when doing that) or he tries to bull rush.
In the bowl game they ran at him all day long and he was lost out there trying to set the edge. I came away unimpressed and thought he would be a good mid-round pick to try and develop.
On top of that, he admitted himself that he played a very simplistic role in college and has to learn schemes. I just do not trust taking a guy high that is so far behind in basic football knowledge.
Finally, as a guy who admitted that his only job was to rush the QB, to have a career high of 8 his sophomore year is concerning to me as well. For a guy who is going to have to transition to another position and learn from scratch new responsibilities, how many sacks can we expect from him in the NFL?
Reed just doesn't seem like a BB type pick unless that pick is made in the 3rd round or later. I cannot get on board with people wanting him at 28 or 33.
What am I missing here? am I wrong?
Good post. Much like in Sheard's case, the paucity of OLBs who fit BBs measureables are causing massive grade inflation. I can see Reed at 60 or higher with a modest trade up. He's definitely an effort guy, which is great, and might be able to compete on teams, but I don't think he'll be taking more than 5-8 snaps a game defensively this year.
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
I think we're all struggling with the reality that college "productivity" as a pass rusher is a surprisingly weak predictor of NFL success, especially as a 3-4 OLB. Larry English and Vernon Gholston each put up better college numbers than Clay Matthews and Cameron Wake combined, etc. etc. It's just a very, very hard position to project.
So one reasonable approach is to simply look for good athletes with strong frames who play with relentless intensity and seem to have the will to improve. Thus Reed and Sheard.
Personally, I find that the closer I look at this whole class of OLB prospects the less I like them, like usual. But I think it's time to take some chances at the position, so Reed and Sheard are both on my short list.
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
It seems this happens every year, a player impresses at the combine and becomes the new 'flavor of the month'. I don't recall his name being mentioned during the season last fall, only recently. I'm very wary about a player when they suddenly look great in the combine or One post season game. I think Mike Mammula
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by midwestpatsfan
I get the appeal at first glance, he has that height, weight, speed that BB mentioned a few years back, but has anyone really watched him play?
I watched 3 games of his this year.(Iowa, USC, and OKie ST.)
The Iowa game showed that he had some raw potential and a prospect for the Patriots, but the USC and OK. St game also showed that he has a lot of work to do.
Right now, he is a one trick pony with a limited skillset in that role. He is a pass rush specialist without any pass rush moves. He has a good first step, but he either trys to speed rush to the outside(and does not have great bend when doing that) or he tries to bull rush.
In the bowl game they ran at him all day long and he was lost out there trying to set the edge. I came away unimpressed and thought he would be a good mid-round pick to try and develop.
On top of that, he admitted himself that he played a very simplistic role in college and has to learn schemes. I just do not trust taking a guy high that is so far behind in basic football knowledge.
Finally, as a guy who admitted that his only job was to rush the QB, to have a career high of 8 his sophomore year is concerning to me as well. For a guy who is going to have to transition to another position and learn from scratch new responsibilities, how many sacks can we expect from him in the NFL?
Reed just doesn't seem like a BB type pick unless that pick is made in the 3rd round or later. I cannot get on board with people wanting him at 28 or 33.
What am I missing here? am I wrong?
In fact I have to disagree. One of his positives was a variation of pass rush moves.His drop backs are the main issue but I would suspect with his speed and desire would come rather quickly. We always pigeon hole everyone to that "Willie McGinnest type". I see him as a consistent pain in the ass to our competitors QBs. I watched his game. He is relentless. He had the fastest 10 yard of anyone of the top ten ranked OLBs including Miller and speed merchant Moch (surprised?) and was the strongest. Will it translate to the field? Who knows but the height, weight, speed and desire seem to indicate a reasonable circumstance.
This is what you posted: Right now, he is a one trick pony with a limited skillset in that role. He is a pass rush specialist without any pass rush moves.
But.........Draft Scout: Has bull and speed rushes and an OK spin move as pass rush technique. Rob Rang:Variety of pass moves. Violent hands. From the Senoir Bowl: Later in the week, when Reed played linebacker and dropped into coverage, his ball skills were as proficient as many of the every day linebackers he played next to.
More from the Senior Bowl:
WOW! (Reed) had three terrific pass rushes in a row. The first was against (Mississippi State left Tackle Derrik) Sherrod who he beat by dipping his shoulder and turning the corner on him. On his second battle against Sherrod, he dusted him with an inside spin move. On his next snap, he went up against Auburn RT Lee Ziemba and this time the 262 pound Reed bull-rushed Ziemba back to where the QB would be. Three snaps, three different pass rush moves for Reed
Look at the board. Quinn and Smith have the same issue as does Kerrigan. I am infatuate with Miller's game but he also has that stigma. Houston and Acho? Same deal. All are DE/OLB players with some flaws.
Ayers as an OLB? Forget him. Should not be on BB's board as he has no pass rush game whatsoever and that is well documented. He is rated as a very solid linebacking presence who will not add pass rush.
In actuality, the only one you can document as an actual NCAA OLB with pass rush skills in the first two rounds, is Bruce Carter but he has injury concerns. I can't see BB waiting to pull the trigger any later than 2nd.
I am of the Reed camp but would take Kerrigan first. I think both Smith and Reed are now the same value.
My question is why is everyone so hot on Quinn? He didn't play in 2010 and he really only had one good year on his body of work. They say his sacks were inflated. He must look the part.
DW Toys
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by midwestpatsfan
why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
He has good measurables and looks like Clay Matthews.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by reflexblue
It seems this happens every year, a player impresses at the combine and becomes the new 'flavor of the month'. I don't recall his name being mentioned during the season last fall, only recently. I'm very wary about a player when they suddenly look great in the combine or One post season game. I think Mike Mammula
Would you say the NEPats Forum superstar binkie Connor Barwin famous?
DW Toys
Re: I have to ask, why is everyone so high on Brooks Reed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DW Toys
Would you say the NEPats Forum superstar binkie Connor Barwin famous?
DW Toys
Public Service Announcement: This is the annual reminder that Connor Barwin was the Big East sack leader, and Clay Matthews was the pure Combine phenom.