Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree21Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2013, 09:48 AM   #1
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Double TE's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Reading MA
Posts: 696
My Mood: Aggressive
Default Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

With all that said, there is one area in which the Ravens have clearly played better without Lewis, and that is in pass coverage. When Lewis has played this season, opposing running backs have caught 70 percent of the passes thrown their way and averaged 5.6 yards per target. Those numbers are a little lower than the average for running backs. In his absence, though, that catch rate fell to 62 percent and the average gain to 3.9 yards.

That might not matter against some teams, but against the Patriots, it could be a fatal flaw. To a large degree, New England is a running team (only Seattle had more carries in the regular season), and that means Lewis' performance on early downs will be crucial. However, the Patriots' running backs are also dangerous receivers. New England averaged 8.1 yards per pass when throwing to its running backs (mostly Danny Woodhead, but also Shane Vereen, Stevan Ridley and Brandon Bolden) this season, the highest of any team in the league. Vereen might have been the MVP of New England's playoff win over Houston, catching five passes on six targets for 83 yards and two receiving touchdowns.

Obviously, if the Patriots split Ridley out wide against Baltimore as they did against the Texans, Lewis won't be vacating the middle to cover him. However, Lewis will be in charge of covering receivers out of the backfield, and that could be a serious problem. If Baltimore wants to win one more for Ray, the Ravens will need to help him out on passing downs.
__________________
If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?
Double TE is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-15-2013, 09:52 AM   #2
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
MrNathanDrake's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,284
My Mood: Devilish
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

A heavy dose of Vereen and Woodhead
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Bring on the 2012 Season
MrNathanDrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 09:54 AM   #3
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

Against Denver Lewis couldn't catch ball carriers unless they came running it up the middle. Almost everyone could run away from him. He piled on after a teammate made a tackle.

He couldn't even catch that easy INT against the Colts...


I don't see him having a big impact on this game on the field, but it depends how BAL uses him. Seems like NE wil play around him,.
AzPatsFan and Welkerstache like this.
Hawks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:13 AM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
Fixit's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,294
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNathanDrake View Post
A heavy dose of Vereen and Woodhead
Is it crazy to think we might see them at the same time for a bunch of plays?
Fixit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:16 AM   #5
SVN
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,184
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

His impact is more in recognizing the offense and setting the defense where his intelligence is invaluable. Physically... not sure.
patsfan13 likes this.
SVN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:16 AM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fixit View Post
Is it crazy to think we might see them at the same time for a bunch of plays?
Why not? I'd like to see a lot of 2 back sets, with either Ridley/Vereen or Woodhead/Vereen. Vereen can be moved all over the place, and he can be used like a receiver as well as as a RB.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:16 AM   #7
On the Roster
 
OnTheHeights's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

I think the best bet is going to be motioning Vereen out wide, with Hernandez close in playing the traditional TE spot. Lewis isn't going to split outside to cover Vereen, so one of the other LBs will be forced to do it, leaving a much better chance that Lewis will be covering Hernandez, which would be a disaster for the Ravens.
OnTheHeights is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:24 AM   #8
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,283
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
Why not? I'd like to see a lot of 2 back sets, with either Ridley/Vereen or Woodhead/Vereen. Vereen can be moved all over the place, and he can be used like a receiver as well as as a RB.
Agreed. We might as well now that Gronk is shelved. I would still stay away from running right at him but, in the passing game, Lewis should have a Maryland sized bullseye on his chest.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:26 AM   #9
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
DarrylStingley's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 586
My Mood: Pensive
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

Lewis is too slow to cover TEs and RBs. Here's to the Pats exposing that.

Now if the Ravens need someone to murder one of the Pats.....and then buy their relatives off....Ray is your MAN, and a believer at that!
DarrylStingley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 10:33 AM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,718
My Mood: Amused
Default re: Ray Lewis a liability on D vs. Pats?

Unless they have a big day on third downs it is gonna be a long day for that Ravens defense. If the Patriots run their hurry up, and there is absolutely no reason to believe they won't, then this Ravens defense is going to get gassed in a hurry and it is hard to see how they hold up for an entire game, especially after playing the number of downs they have played recently.

This Ravens team kind of reminds me of the Patriots before Belichick started the rebuild. They do have some younger players in the mix but by and large the core of the team is the much older veterans like Reed, Lewis, Boldin, Birk, McKinnie, and Suggs. From what I can tell Jimmy Smith is 3rd on the depth chart at CB, when they were counting on him to be a key piece on their defense, and while Terrance Cody is playing he hasn't been dominant and will likely wear down if they are running their fast break offense for any sustained period of time.

I think the Patriots are going to put up 35 this weekend and don't believe the Ravens can match that when all is said and done.
PeerlessKid likes this.
Ivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BP Liability PatsFanInVa Political Discussion 86 05-28-2010 12:22 PM
Capping oil spill Liability Holy Diver Political Discussion 3 05-19-2010 04:19 PM
Palin a liability Patters Political Discussion 18 10-19-2008 05:47 PM
Has Watson become a liability? Alk PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 43 12-04-2006 01:13 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563