2012 Surprises/Disappointments - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree42Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2013, 06:26 PM   #41
All Pro Poster
 
JackBauer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 12,892
Wink Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph View Post
The pot calling the kettle black.

If the Pats listened to Jack, Maroney, Chad Jackson, Bethel, Wlihite, Butler would all still be on the team.
Wow, what a terrific rejoinder.

Let's not forget that you're arguing for a guy who has 700 yard receiving in his entire career (oh, and he can't stay healthy, either) to take over for the guy who's good for 100+ recs and 1,000 yards year consistently.

I honestly don't know what's more sad: that you'd attempt to advance such a lousy argument, or what you're apparently completely unaware how lousy your argument actually is.
JackBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-02-2013, 06:59 PM   #42
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PlainOldEd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 895
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer View Post
Are you close with his treating physician? 4 weeks according to whom? If you'll recall, the snap consensus when the freak injury occurred was insta-IR.

I always get a kick when people question Hernandez' toughness when he's been gutting it out there on one wheel. You'd be better off sticking to your other keen observations, like how Ninkovich is the worst starter in the league.
And if anyone knows tough, it's Jack Bauer.........
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Jack Bauer.jpg (25.3 KB, 196 views)
PlainOldEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 07:12 PM   #43
In the Starting Line-up
 
Triumph's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,774
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer View Post
Wow, what a terrific rejoinder.
Some real gems from you over the years indeed.

I can understand you wanting to keep Welker (actually good) after youve fought so hard over the years for studs like Maroney and Chad Jackson (2 bums working at McDonalds today)

Quote:
Let's not forget that you're arguing for a guy who has 700 yard receiving in his entire career
So, Edelman cant improve on those numbers playing the slot full time?

Brady has alot to do with Welker putting up those numbers.

Quote:
(oh, and he can't stay healthy, either)
Edelman played 11 games in 2009 (broken forearm), 15 in 2010, and 13 in 2011. Even this year he managed 9. Edelman has missed 16 games in 4 seasons. He needs to learn to go down after the catch.

Quote:
to take over for the guy who's good for 100+ recs and 1,000 yards year consistently.
Big deal.

Older players get injured too.

The Pats have won 3 Super Bowls with Troy Brown playing the slot. Where is it written in stone that the Pats slot WR must have 100 receptions per season? The Pats have more weapons today than those Super Bowl teams. And, like Ive already stated, NE needs an injection of youth into the WR position.

Quote:
I honestly don't know what's more sad: that you'd attempt to advance such a lousy argument, or what you're apparently completely unaware how lousy your argument actually is.
Im pointing out that Edelman has shown enough this season that he can play the slot in 2013 which is accurate. Too bad that gets your underwear all in bunch.

Whats really sad is that you cannot read. I never stated that Edelman would put up Welkers numbers or even come close.
Triumph is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 07:40 PM   #44
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 67
My Mood: Hungover
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

The biggest surprise is one of the units not a player. The oline has played very well this season. After a offseason of " Please resign Brian Waters" we saw the line come together and play much better than expected. Between Brady not getting sacked and the running backs having the holes that allowed them to close out games, they played great. This preseason they looked awful.

A player that did not live up to the hype is goskowski. No trust in him right now. Missed some kicks that could of really built the trust needed in the playoffs.
The Brandon Five and ay-yo like this.
Coog548 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 08:51 PM   #45
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 65
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph View Post
Branchs history, Moss's history, Givens history, Pattens history.

Do you think that Welker will put up the same numbers that he is today on a different team ?

Because thats what his value is based on isnt?
Well... the Broncos need a slot receiver. And yes, I think he'd have a *similar* output if he ends up in ATL, GB, Denvah, NO, etc. If we let WW walk and he went to Denver I would literally kill someone. That someone hopefully being the forehead.
TFB* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 08:52 PM   #46
In the Starting Line-up
 
Palm Beach Pats Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,864
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph View Post
Edelman has missed 16 games in 4 seasons.
playing spot minutes, mostly on special teams, he's hurt far more than the guy you want him to replace

Matthew Slater has played more games and it doesn't make him a capable WR either
__________________
It is what it is, so just go out there and do your job!
Palm Beach Pats Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 09:36 PM   #47
All Pro Poster
 
JackBauer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 12,892
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph View Post
Im pointing out that Edelman has shown enough this season that he can play the slot in 2013 which is accurate. Too bad that gets your underwear all in bunch.

Whats really sad is that you cannot read. I never stated that Edelman would put up Welkers numbers or even come close.
Actually, what's really sad is that you can't maintain a logically consistent argument from one line to the next. You say that Edelman has demonstrated enough to warrant playing him in the slot next year (by virtue of his whopping 9 GP, 21 recs and 235 yards receiving), while at the same time admitting he's unlikely to replicate Welkers numbers "or even come close." That we should replace by far the best WR on the team - a guy who had been putting up HoF numbers - with a guy who looks demonstrates in flashes but who has never exceeded 359 yards receiving in a season. So, basically, you want to replace Welker with a guy who has demonstrated, at his peak, the ability to put up ... one quarter of WW's typical numbers. While we're at it, why don't we replace Mankins with Donald Thomas!?

I thought Ivan was being overwrought with his Welker posts, but it turns out there are people dumb enough out there making the very arguments he's inveighing against.
JackBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 10:27 PM   #48
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
NormZauchin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 207
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palm Beach Pats Fan View Post
playing spot minutes, mostly on special teams, he's hurt far more than the guy you want him to replace

Matthew Slater has played more games and it doesn't make him a capable WR either
You make a point that is overlooked by most. How many injuries a player sustains is affected by both his durability and the number of plays in which he participates. Gronk missed five games with the broken arm, but last season and this season, until he got hurt, he was out there for almost every offensive play. Not so with Edelman.
NormZauchin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 04:00 AM   #49
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 329
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1%er View Post
Share your thoughts?
Surprises:
Justin Francis
Brandon Deaderick
Chandler Jones
Alfonzo Dennard
Stevan Ridley
Ryan Wendell
Julian Edelman
Donald Thomas
Brandon Bolden
Jermaine Cunningham

Disappointments:
Logan Mankins
Jonathan Fanene
Ron Brace
Patrick Chung
Jake Bequette
Kellen Winslow
Myron Pryor

I think surprise and disappointment have to be limited to players you actually had expectations attached to. For example, Solder and Hightower aren't really surprises, because they were elite college players and top prospects, and obtained using premium capital. They damn well better be good players. Conversely, Kyle Arrington is only a disappointment if you were expecting him to not be a liability. Same with Trevor Scott, Sterling Moore, Tavon Wilson etc. Dennis Green would have said, "they are who we thought they were!"
Get it shawtaay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 04:02 AM   #50
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 329
Default Re: 2012 Surprises/Disappointments

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer View Post
Actually, what's really sad is that you can't maintain a logically consistent argument from one line to the next. You say that Edelman has demonstrated enough to warrant playing him in the slot next year (by virtue of his whopping 9 GP, 21 recs and 235 yards receiving), while at the same time admitting he's unlikely to replicate Welkers numbers "or even come close." That we should replace by far the best WR on the team - a guy who had been putting up HoF numbers - with a guy who looks demonstrates in flashes but who has never exceeded 359 yards receiving in a season. So, basically, you want to replace Welker with a guy who has demonstrated, at his peak, the ability to put up ... one quarter of WW's typical numbers. While we're at it, why don't we replace Mankins with Donald Thomas!?

I thought Ivan was being overwrought with his Welker posts, but it turns out there are people dumb enough out there making the very arguments he's inveighing against.
This isn't as unreasonable as you're making it sound...
Get it shawtaay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563