12-08-2012, 03:40 PM
|
#31
|
|
On the Roster
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 77
|
Re: Defending Texans Play Action
Quote:
Originally Posted by PP2
This is an interesting thing to discuss, and I think it will be a great game too and can't wait to watch it on Monday night. Very exciting.
The problem with the zone blocking scheme is that you block whoever shows up in front of you, not a specific player. My thought on that is Spikes will cause some big headaches with this. If you have seen him, you know he has an uncanny ability to time the snap count. My believe is that in addition to focusing on stopping the run, Spikes will be one-gapping along with one or two more linemen who will try to shoot through the zones.
With the bootleg, as you described it, is not a play-action (at least not to my knowledge). I think the same principle as above would threaten. The concept of "contain" rushing would serve to seal the edge on any bootleg/naked bootleg, and you would still have the one-gapping backer or lineman crashing at an angle to minimize the vertical gain of the bootleg.
|
Most of our bootlegs are from the play action. When the backside DE or OLB tries to contain the bootleg (ie. keying on the QB), he takes himself out of a possible run play.
When The RB cut back to his side, he left a small crease that the RB can work through for a decent-to-good gain.
That is why the scheme is hard to defend.
Shanaban and Kubiak have been making a living out of this for years and years.
Yes, it can be defended, but it has never been easy.
|
|
|