ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I just re-watched some highlights from the Texans @ Bears game from a few week ago, which was played in some nasty downpour conditions. Was a pretty messy, low-scoring game (probably also in part due to Cutler getting hammered and out for the second half).
Any thoughts about the implications of rain for THIS PARTICULAR game (facing the Texans)? Which team would capitalize on the weather better? (if at all) I’d imagine catching wet balls would make both teams rely more on the running game. On the other hand, trying to break a tackle isn’t an easy task on a wet turf.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I think Tom Brady is better than Jay Cutler. I think Tom Brady is the best bad weather quarterback of all time. I think the Patriots are better than the Bears.
I really don't think it matters much. I think Brady plays just as well in bad weather as in good weather. I suppose if Schaub plays worse in poor weather, then it would be an edge for the Pats, but I really don't know what his history is.
I really don't think it matters much. I think Brady plays just as well in bad weather as in good weather. I suppose if Schaub plays worse in poor weather, then it would be an edge for the Pats, but I really don't know what his history is.
Brady plays really well in the snow, but not so much when it's raining.
It isn't meaningless as there is plenty of evidence of teams buckling due to weather but it also doesn't have to be a factor either as Brady has proven to play pretty damn well in it and it is certainly possible the Texans can handle it too.
But then again they are the dome team and have played in it much less. Basically it may or may not be an advantage but more than likely if it benefits anyone it will benefit the Patriots.
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"
I think Tom Brady is better than Jay Cutler. I think Tom Brady is the best bad weather quarterback of all time. I think the Patriots are better than the Bears.
and BB is better than Lovie Smith
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I wasn’t trying to compare the Pats to the Bears or Brady to Cutler (no competition there). I just mentioned that game because it was played under similar weather conditions – it just happened to be the Bears.
As far as performance goes, I’m sure Brady can handle the rain, but a wet ball is certainly harder to catch than a dry one – I think everyone here can agree on that. From a receiver’s perspective (and Pats is (or used to be) more of a passing team), things could get ugly.
Lastly, I posed the question not because I wanted to know which team would benefit more/less from the wet conditions. But rather which team (Texans is mainly a running team) could make better use OF the conditions. Not which team is more accustomed to the weather. This is not a dome team vs. an open stadium one, or a warm climate team vs. a cold weather one. In other words, rain in and of itself would benefits a particular playing scheme – which one of the teams plays a scheme that is suited better for rain. Say…. A good running team can benefits from its RBs and not have to rely too much on the pass.
Sorry for the confusion.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
I wasn’t trying to compare the Pats to the Bears or Brady to Cutler (no competition there). I just mentioned that game because it was played under similar weather conditions – it just happened to be the Bears.
As far as performance goes, I’m sure Brady can handle the rain, but a wet ball is certainly harder to catch than a dry one – I think everyone here can agree on that. From a receiver’s perspective (and Pats is (or used to be) more of a passing team), things could get ugly.
Lastly, I posed the question not because I wanted to know which team would benefit more/less from the wet conditions. But rather which team (Texans is mainly a running team) could make better use OF the conditions. Not which team is more accustomed to the weather. This is not a dome team vs. an open stadium one, or a warm climate team vs. a cold weather one. In other words, rain in and of itself would benefits a particular playing scheme – which one of the teams plays a scheme that is suited better for rain. Say…. A good running team can benefits from its RBs and not have to rely too much on the pass.
Sorry for the confusion.
I answered it for you already. Brady is the GOAT and is one of the best bad weather quarterbacks of all time. Advantage - Pats.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.