ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Pats inactives: GRONK, Jones, Mankins, Petrus, Shiancoe, Develin, Martin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spergon Wynn
Real glad we used the IR exception on Shiancoe...
IDK, at the time it wasn't a bad move.
Who else would they use it on. Another poster mentioned Demps, but Demps probably will benefit more from a red shirt year and probably wouldn't be active this season even if he could have come back. It isn't like the Pats lost anyone that they would have dumped on the in season IR. They want(ed) both Gronk and Hernandez back much sooner than the IR period allowed.
They might have used it on Gaffney. But considering how his year has panned out, he might have been a worse decision to use that IR exception on.
Re: Pats inactives: GRONK, Jones, Mankins, Petrus, Shiancoe, Develin, Martin
It might have been used on Hernandez.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
IDK, at the time it wasn't a bad move.
Who else would they use it on. Another poster mentioned Demps, but Demps probably will benefit more from a red shirt year and probably wouldn't be active this season even if he could have come back. It isn't like the Pats lost anyone that they would have dumped on the in season IR. They want(ed) both Gronk and Hernandez back much sooner than the IR period allowed.
They might have used it on Gaffney. But considering how his year has panned out, he might have been a worse decision to use that IR exception on.
Re: Pats inactives: GRONK, Jones, Mankins, Petrus, Shiancoe, Develin, Martin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729
IDK, at the time it wasn't a bad move.
I disagree. Shiancoe barely practiced so he was/is a completely unknown factor and we already had Fells. Plus, there was probably a reason Shiancoe was a FA for as long as he was.
I would've gone with Demps, personally. I think his impact on returns and pure speed would outweigh anything contributions Shiancoe could make.
That's just my take on it though. For all I know, Shiancoe will play next week and get 150 yards for 2 TDs...
Re: Pats inactives: GRONK, Jones, Mankins, Petrus, Shiancoe, Develin, Martin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spergon Wynn
Real glad we used the IR exception on Shiancoe...
Doesn't matter who you used it on. Demps or anyone else could have been kept too. It's one "get out of jail free card". As soon as you have a guy you want all season who is out for a while you might as well use it. This stategizing over when to use it is silly. If they'd wanted Shiancoe and Demps later in the season they could IR-DTR one and keep the other active. Which is done to which player is irrelevant.
Re: Pats inactives: GRONK, Jones, Mankins, Petrus, Shiancoe, Develin, Martin
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
It might have been used on Hernandez.
Nah! They brought Hernandez back faster than he could have if he was on the IR. Granted that was a mistake in hindsight. But if they waited another week or two, he might not have reinjured himself and he would probably would have returned sooner than the IR exception allowed.