ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Off The Grid Goes Dien Bien Phu, Chapter #847
The idiocy of continuing to insist that it was a choice between jettisoning Seymour or Wilfork ~ or Mankins ~ astonishes me.
Had my advice been taken then ~ rather than one long year later ~ we could've jettisoned Randy Moss and'is bloated contract...and gotten one HELL of a lot more than a 3rd Rounder for'm.
And we could've kept all of those guys...
NOT that it pleases me to be in Accord with Deuce Awry, you understand...
HELL...
If I'D been running the Books, we would've Tagged & Traded Moss IMMEDIATELY after'is 23 TouchDown 2007 Season...and probably gotten CONSECUTIVE 1st Rounders out'f'm...maybe from the SKINS.
But I digress...
__________________
Love HURTS!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It All Starts In The Trenches.
Run The Damned Ball.
Use The Whole Pig.
Develop & Deploy a Tenacious D!!
Drive the Enemy before you...and savor the Lamentations of their Women!!
Count the Rings.
Rinse & Repeat.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Off The Grid
Had my advice been taken then ~ rather than one long year later ~ we could've jettisoned Randy Moss and'is bloated contract...and gotten one HELL of a lot more than a 3rd Rounder for'm.
HELL!
I'd like to jettison Steven Gregory and his contract, no matter how inconsequential the salary cap hit.
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!
Last edited by ATippett56; 10-10-2012 at 12:31 AM..
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56
HELL!
I'd like to jettison Steven Gregory and his contract, no matter how inconsequential the salary cap hit.
Tip--
So far this year, you want to jettison Donald Thomas, Ryan Wendell, Marcus Cannon, Sterling Moore, Steve Gregory, at least ONE of Vereen/Woodhead, and probably many more that I can't think of.
I am in agreement with you with some of them, at least the fact that they should not be starting...but if you ran the team we'd only have about 30 guys on it
All of those guys will have roles here in some form or another, whether that is starting, providing rotational reps, or just providing depth for injuries and practice reps during the week.
You so often bring up the salary cap....think about it.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Always thought the there were behind the scenes mitigating circumstances that caused Seymour to leave(Malloy also), perhaps having grown up in paranoid times dictates my skepticism.
Some day when Bill writes the trilogy of what happened here, we may begin to know the whole story, but until then we wait for all of this to unfold..
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Quote:
Originally Posted by betterthanthealternative
Forgotten in this is the fact that the Pats first offered Wilfork to the Raiders, when faced with the "either/or" of the two DL's. When they didn't bite, the Pats offered Seymour, and the Raiders bit.
It was forgotten because it was Felger who made the claim, and then he went back against it.
Both of these threads started with the Patriots offering Wilfork to the Raiders, then both threads mention a reversal from Felger who said maybe it was the Raiders who inquired.
In the first link, a poster heard Lombardi's version saying the Raiders asked about Wilfork which coincides with Felger's reversal.
No one can be really certain what is said behind closed doors. But I wouldn't consider Felger much of a source. Might as well start quoting your uncle Bob who watches football on Thanksgiving as a reliable source.
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Quote:
Originally Posted by betterthanthealternative
Forgotten in this is the fact that the Pats first offered Wilfork to the Raiders, when faced with the "either/or" of the two DL's. When they didn't bite, the Pats offered Seymour, and the Raiders bit.
This was a rumor, I remember reading about it too. To my knowledge it was never proven as fact, unless you have a legit trusted source with a link.
__________________
Organized madness
The young Gott-stra
Young Frank Sinatra
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
i was never happy about the trade at the time they did trade a all pro DT in he's prime for a pick in two years but in the long run it worked out for the pats and they learned from mistakes by signing Gronk and hernandez long term befor the price for TE's goes to high,
when Seymour wanted a new contract the price was only about 9 or 10 million per when they trade it him the price was 12 to 14 million per
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Rather than an either/or with Wilfork and Seymour, with the benefit of hindsight, the miscalculation was tying up Warren over Seymour. Talk about being invisible after signing a contract. The quality of his play went downhill soon after he signed along with his health and seemingly, his commitment.
Re: Revisiting The Richard Seymour Trade - Oakland Raiders Fans Not Happy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSR
A franchise LT is probably worth about the same a franchise DE on most teams. However, I would argue that we don't necessarily need a top 10 LT talent for Scar to turn into a franchise LT. Meanwhile, that combination of size, speed and skill that those top D picks had is a rarity. That is what made Seymour so special.
As Solder develops he seems to have the tools to be able to handle speed rushers. If (when) he can handle them 1 on 1 without help that is a huge bonus for the offense.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
Both of these threads started with the Patriots offering Wilfork to the Raiders, then both threads mention a reversal from Felger who said maybe it was the Raiders who inquired.
In the first link, a poster heard Lombardi's version saying the Raiders asked about Wilfork which coincides with Felger's reversal.
No one can be really certain what is said behind closed doors. But I wouldn't consider Felger much of a source. Might as well start quoting your uncle Bob who watches football on Thanksgiving as a reliable source.
Yeah I seriously doubt that the Pats offered Wilfolk before Big Sey.
A guy who can Play NT at the Elite level as well as play DT at and Elite level is harder to find than a player who can play at the Elite level at the DT/DE position.
When you add in the age factor of the 2 Wilfolk was much more valuable to the Pats at that point in time.
Getting the prime of Big Sey's career then flipping that for a guy with the potential to be you LT for 10 years is a great deal for the Pats.
No need to knock Seymour, he was great while he was here and probably his first couple of years in Oakland, but the move was the right one for the Pats.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."