An utterly amazing statistic: 35 first downs, and 68 in back to back games - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
re: An utterly amazing statistic: 35 first downs, and 68 in back to back games
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa
.
I don't think I've seen this married up often with a team that goes no huddle all game. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Only example that comes to mind is the Bills under Marv Levy with Jim Kelly and Thurman Thomas. They would go no huddle all game, and on occasion they would catch the D with a small nickle/dime look and run & run with Thomas.
You need a really versatile / flexible group of offensive players to pull it off, first getting the defense to sell out on the pass while you have a very run-capable unit on the field, and then to keep it that way by not allowing substitution.
__________________
It is what it is, so just go out there and do your job!
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
re: An utterly amazing statistic: 35 first downs, and 68 in back to back games
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palm Beach Pats Fan
Only example that comes to mind is the Bills under Marv Levy with Jim Kelly and Thurman Thomas. They would go no huddle all game, and on occasion they would catch the D with a small nickle/dime look and run & run with Thomas.
You need a really versatile / flexible group of offensive players to pull it off, first getting the defense to sell out on the pass while you have a very run-capable unit on the field, and then to keep it that way by not allowing substitution.
Cool - I wonder if any coaches are looking at their defense and saying that if Ridley runs for more than 100 yards, the Patriots wont win.
They'd probably have to add the caveat that Welker won't have >10 catches and the running game won't be >200 yards... I guess that de-simplifies the beauty of the original statement
__________________
Jersey here we come!(and not to play the jesters To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. )
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
re: An utterly amazing statistic: 35 first downs, and 68 in back to back games
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFaninAZ
I am sort of surprised a team can have that many first downs and score "only" 31 points.
I guess part of that was going from one yard line to the other one yard line and only getting 3 points. I suppose, because they got knocked back after getting to the one yard line, it officially goes down as a 95 yard field goal drive. Still that's hard to do.
We really didn't have many deep plays (run or pass). Most of the first downs were less than 15 yards.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. - 4 years = To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: An utterly amazing statistic: 35 first downs, and 68 in back to back games
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa
Interesting nugget hidden in the Pats' current style:
What's usually the tempo of a team with a strong running game and a lot of first downs?
I think it's usually down-tempo.
I don't think I've seen this married up often with a team that goes no huddle all game. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
It definitely puts a twist on things... you can take 12 minutes off the clock in a drive with a top-tier running game... or you can run it full throttle along w/everybody else in the no-huddle, with the next play coming to quick to allow substitutions.
Gives Bill a lil' flexibility. Hey any of you guys know if Bill likes flexibility?
I, also, found it amazing how fast the managed the no-huddle and got to the line and began the play. I have seen them, as well as other teams, use the no huddle but I just cant recall it ever being accomplished in such a fast manner. They must have spent the entire week working on it.
I hope they continue doing the same thing at Seattle.
With, of course, some minor tweaking such as adding a new play, or two and making minor adjustments in those that did not work well. But stay in the "Lightning Speed" No huddle offense.
1. I looked back at 2009, expecting to see us ranked poorly that year. I was shocked to see Pats at #1 that year! It felt like we used to struggle to keep drives going that year.
2. We were #1 in 2007 (not surprising), but also in 2008.
3. It's early in the season so our current average of 30.2 first downs per game will probably decrease somewhat. However, comparing with other teams at the same point in the season this year, at #2 is Detroit who has 4.7 fewer first downs per game (followed by SF who have 6.2 fewer). Compare that to 0.9, which is the average difference between the leader and #2 in the years since 2003.
Meaning our first down numbers this year really are very impressive! That's what you get when you add a commanding running game to an already dominant passing offense
Re: An utterly amazing statistic: 35 first downs, and 68 in back to back games
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountain_Commando
Great find!
Some points of note:
1. I looked back at 2009, expecting to see us ranked poorly that year. I was shocked to see Pats at #1 that year! It felt like we used to struggle to keep drives going that year.
2. We were #1 in 2007 (not surprising), but also in 2008.
Don't forget, though, that in 2008 the Pats had the most productive rushing attack they'd had in 25 years.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.