ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
The Pats lost but showed they are more physical than finesse in 2012
I did notice this and it was confirmed by Michael Irvin when he said that this game showed more physical presence of the Patriots than they showed in years.
I was hating the previous years when it looked like the team had gone soft and finesse like the Colts,but this years team if anything is more tough and physical and can go toe to toe with tough teams like the Ravens,Texans and 49ers.
I thought we would lose this game and unfortunately I was right,what I didn't expect was to see a former finesse team look more tough and play like it.
If they continue to be tough like they were tonight,the team won't be intimidated,especially on the road against tough nosed teams like the Ravens.
On to Buffalo gentleman.....relax,more than half the league is 1 & 2,the team is not done yet.
Last edited by PATRIOTSFANINPA; 09-23-2012 at 11:45 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: The Pats lost but showed they are more physical than finesse in 2012
Mankins was sticking up for everyone out there. They are much more physical this year and yes the pats will be fine. Jets and MIA and prob buff all still suck
Re: The Pats lost but showed they are more physical than finesse in 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA
I did notice this and it was confirmed by Michael Irvin when he said that this game showed more physical presence of the Patriots than they showed in years.
I was hating the previous years when it looked like the team had gone soft and finesse like the Colts,but this years team if anything is more tough and physical and can go toe to toe with tough teams like the Ravens,Texans and 49ers.
I thought we would lose this game and unfortunately I was right,what I didn't expect was to see a former finesse team look more tough and play like it.
If they continue to be tough like they were tonight,the team won't be intimidated,especially on the road against tough nosed teams like the Ravens.
On to Buffalo gentleman.....relax,more than half the league is 1 & 2,the team is not done yet.
Well put....
This team does have heart.
I can see it when Brady gets control and does the 2 minute drill.
I can see it when they make great defensive plays.
1 and 2 is not the end. its just the beginning. We will see the ravens and probably the cardinals again.
Re: The Pats lost but showed they are more physical than finesse in 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA
Do you expect to see Arizona in the Super Bowl....otherwise I guarantee you,they won't play each other again for a few years.
A scary thought: for the past six seasons, the NFC representative has played the Patriots during the regular season:
2006: Chicago
2007: #@%@%
2008: Arizona
2009: New Orleans
2010: Green Bay
2011: @#%@%
By that token, the 2012 NFC representative should be coming out of . . . the NFC West.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: The Pats lost but showed they are more physical than finesse in 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
A scary thought: for the past six seasons, the NFC representative has played the Patriots during the regular season:
2006: Chicago
2007: #@%@%
2008: Arizona
2009: New Orleans
2010: Green Bay
2011: @#%@%
By that token, the 2012 NFC representative should be coming out of . . . the AFC West.
You mean the NFC West
And yes,I think that will stand
It's only week 3 but to me it's clear that the 49ers,despite getting beaten today are going to have a good chance......I love what Atlanta is doing as well,Matt Ryan is a stud QB
Last edited by PATRIOTSFANINPA; 09-24-2012 at 12:01 AM..
Re: The Pats lost but showed they are more physical than finesse in 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA
Woodhead is 5'7 ....let's talk about REAL RBs
Could have used one in the second half. Why not just go empty backfield? Woodhead has caught one (1) pass this year.
I understand, in theory, they want him in the hurry up, but he is not Kevin Faulk in reality, so that theory makes no sense IMO.
I think it's instructive to look at it from the defenses point of view. Are they worried about getting to the QB with the massive Woodhead protecting him? Maybe worried about his awesome dangerous capability in the open field, the way he breaks tackles and can't be taken down by one man. Is that why they respect the play action so much they almost killed Branch? (If I'm wrong on that, I'll apologize, but I'm in mid rant here). Are they petrified, he might get reception number two if they don't leave someone in coverage?
Seriously, he's a nice story, a good student for a marginal NFL player that will at least know the plays if someone gets hurt. I don't know why, when a good balanced drive can seal the game, we let the defense virtually play against a ten man team because they aren't afraid of him in any phase of the game. When you know you can tackle a guy with one hand if you get fooled, why would you bite on play action?