ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
In contrast to all the Vereen hype, it seems that Woodhead has become an almost invisible man.
Even Reiss has rarely mentioned him up to now. For one of the huge questions for this camp is whether we see this year the electrifying Woodhead of 2010 instead of the disappointing one of 2011. For some reason he fell to earth and apparently isn't expected to rise.
But if he does return to his 2010 form, it will be fascinating to see how McD uses him, especially given the success the Saints had last year featuring the similar Sproles, who -- believe it or not -- is smaller and slower than Woodhead.
But hearing nothing coming out of camp is not a good sign with a running back, and we've heard next to nothing, except for this nugget from Curran yesterday:
Quote:
Danny Woodhead had some brilliant cuts during the first contact sessions.
It seems to me at least as likely that Woodhead will build off his electrifying 2010 than that Vereen will become a great NFL back. So why the near total lack of excitement about Woodhead this year?
For me at least, Woodhead's progress is one of the more interesting questions for this year's camp...
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
In contrast to all the Vereen hype, it seems that Woodhead has become an almost invisible man.
Even Reiss has rarely mentioned him up to now. For one of the huge questions for this camp is whether we see this year the electrifying Woodhead of 2010 instead of the disappointing one of 2011. For some reason he fell to earth and apparently isn't expected to rise.
But if he does return to his 2010 form, it will be fascinating to see how McD uses him, especially given the success the Saints had last year featuring the similar Sproles, who -- believe it or not -- is smaller and slower than Woodhead.
But hearing nothing coming out of camp is not a good sign with a running back, and we've heard next to nothing, except for this nugget from Curran yesterday:
It seems to me at least as likely that Woodhead will build off his electrifying 2010 than that Vereen will become a great NFL back. So why the near total lack of excitement about Woodhead this year?
For me at least, Woodhead's progress is one of the more interesting questions for this year's camp...
I think it's because almost no one can ever actually find him on the field.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
In contrast to all the Vereen hype, it seems that Woodhead has become an almost invisible man.
Even Reiss has rarely mentioned him up to now. For one of the huge questions for this camp is whether we see this year the electrifying Woodhead of 2010 instead of the disappointing one of 2011. For some reason he fell to earth and apparently isn't expected to rise. .
I'm unaware of him falling to earth. Do you have any other comments, quotes or links about that?
I think the Allegedly Dynamic Duo is going to continue to soak up the media coverage because they are the ones on the bubble of suspicion, not Woodhead. To me Woodhead is a lock. He's not somebody I consider coulde even be on the bubble. Tom trusts him, so I trust him.
Now this is only Day Four, and you can only cover so many people in depth. I just think with all the new faces, and with Danny's steady play, there isn't a compelling need to dish a bunch of coverage on him. Once he starts making plays in games or scrimmages.
I think Vereen is going to hog a lot of attention because he seems to be the one falling to earth. Maybe that's an overreaction but he's certainly off to a slow start. No problem, but it does alert your mind about who to watch.
The other thing is that the rookie (blanking on his name) is showing a lot of promise. He's like gangbusters impressive even catching the ball. Now to me that's big news and Woodhead has to wait. We may be watching Vereen get out performed and sent to bubble land? Could happen.
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,377
Re: Woodhead
Quote:
Originally Posted by shmessy
Danny is secure.
Dude had a concussion or two last season and still averaged 4.6 YPC and had over 500 all-purpose yards.
As long as he has no bats in the belfry, he'll be an integral part of the roster..
In addition to the high-ankle sprain he fought with as well. I know hes a fan favorite of sorts but bottom line is that the kid has produced and has a very important role in this offense.
I would tend to agree that hes close to a lock- especially with Addai gone.
The only way Woody doesn't make the team is if they only keep 4 guys in the backfield and two of them are FBs or Bolden inches him out and they keep 2 FBs.
I think Woodhead's performance at TC is a non-issue as long as he performs to or exceeds his expectations. He seems to be the same old Woodhead so really there is nothing to report. No news is good news.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. - 4 years = To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think Woodhead's performance at TC is a non-issue as long as he performs to or exceeds his expectations. He seems to be the same old Woodhead so really there is nothing to report. No news is good news.
Not that it means much, but he looked the best out of all backs in the blitz pickup drill today. Vereen looked good too, but faced lesser competition while Woody took Mayo a couple times.Bolden looked sloppy and Ridley looked awful/indifferent