ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
He won;t be allowed to walk for free...the tag will be put in place. Whether or not we sign him I do have questions over though. Being the wrong side of 30 and given the Patriots struggle at WR...and yes, despite Wes' great year, they struggle with no real size or bulk at the position when they come up against aggressive defenses...do the Pats get what they can, whilst they can? I wouldn't expect any picks higher than a 3rd for a player that's a product of the system but if he wants paying, I don't think we should be paying him.
Hate to be cruel but, as I said, product of the system. There are a lot of Free Agent targets and depth in the draft...with Gronk and Hernandez both due big pay days, they need to make the right decision for the team. I'd rather tie up the two TEs, draft a receiver and bring in Lloyd with Branch on a Vets minimum than pay Wes...call me crazy...
He won;t be allowed to walk for free...the tag will be put in place. Whether or not we sign him I do have questions over though. Being the wrong side of 30 and given the Patriots struggle at WR...and yes, despite Wes' great year, they struggle with no real size or bulk at the position when they come up against aggressive defenses...do the Pats get what they can, whilst they can? I wouldn't expect any picks higher than a 3rd for a player that's a product of the system but if he wants paying, I don't think we should be paying him.
Hate to be cruel but, as I said, product of the system. There are a lot of Free Agent targets and depth in the draft...with Gronk and Hernandez both due big pay days, they need to make the right decision for the team. I'd rather tie up the two TEs, draft a receiver and bring in Lloyd with Branch on a Vets minimum than pay Wes...call me crazy...
Call you crazy? ..... your beyond crazy my friend to want to keep Branch over Welker.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The wide receiver franchise tag is about 9.5+ million, the Patriots will do everything in their power to avoid that cost.. otoh if they do Welker would be a fool not to take it.
He will be back..
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
He won;t be allowed to walk for free...the tag will be put in place. Whether or not we sign him I do have questions over though. Being the wrong side of 30 and given the Patriots struggle at WR...and yes, despite Wes' great year, they struggle with no real size or bulk at the position when they come up against aggressive defenses...do the Pats get what they can, whilst they can? I wouldn't expect any picks higher than a 3rd for a player that's a product of the system but if he wants paying, I don't think we should be paying him.
Hate to be cruel but, as I said, product of the system. There are a lot of Free Agent targets and depth in the draft...with Gronk and Hernandez both due big pay days, they need to make the right decision for the team. I'd rather tie up the two TEs, draft a receiver and bring in Lloyd with Branch on a Vets minimum than pay Wes...call me crazy...
I'll just call you insane. Without Welker this team doesnt make the playoffs. Welker led the league in receptions and was second in yardage.
Product of the system my ass. He makes the system work.
The Pats struggled on offense because of Gronks injury, if Gronk was 100% they would have put away more easily both Ravens and Giants.
Something that irks me is that two ideas are conflated every time talk of the franchise tag comes up:
* Teams frequently use the franchise tag to prevent another team from swooping in and making a megadeal.
* Just because a player is tagged (or receives an RFA tender, for that matter) DOES NOT mean that they have to play out the season under that one-year deal. (see: Wilfork, Vince; Gostkowski, Stephen)
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'll just call you insane. Without Welker this team doesnt make the playoffs. Welker led the league in receptions and was second in yardage.
Product of the system my ass. He makes the system work.
The Pats struggled on offense because of Gronks injury, if Gronk was 100% they would have put away more easily both Ravens and Giants.
We said that about Branch too didn't we? Brady and Wes compliment each other nicely but that's it.
I'm not saying we should...but he isn't going to get paid big money...and if he wants it, I'd rather tag him (and, if he kicks up a fuss, trade him), tie my money up in the two TEs and fish for WRs in free agency and the draft.
For the right price I would love to keep him...but I have doubts as to how many good years he has...and it isn't more than a couple.
You can't fault the logic...and it's not like we haven't seen a decission like this made before....Branch was a classic example.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.