ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Mo's whole gig start with 'I don't like Mallett' and goes from there.
As of right now, Mallett is an outstanding prospect who has the luxury of having some time to develop. doesn't mean he will, but at least he's more than the perennial backup that hoyer is/will be. At least Mallett has a chance to be all that.
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I think Mallett is the future, and he has the luxury to learn the game from the best in the business as opposed to those who are literally thrown to the wolves...
I like Hoyer, but not real sure he will be in a Patriots Uniform next year...
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
Last edited by IllegalContact; 01-09-2012 at 08:05 AM..
I love Mallett, I think that kid is going to be a star. He is one of the few college QB's who has ever made me forget I was watching a college game. It was like he was playing on a different level than the typical pop warner bs many teams throw out there.
__________________ 16-0? Yup I called it: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
bledsoe couldn't make it here? he was the best QB the pats ever had before brady....he made it quite well here.
hoyer simply lacks the one thing a QB needs.......an NFL arm
Oddly that's what they said about Brady. Turns out arm strength is developable via mechanics and is just the tip of the iceberg as far as things a QB needs at this level. And Bledsow couldn't make it here, on a Belichick team running this offense... Nor anywhere else's once he left here, even though he was just 30 at the time.
I don't hate Mallet, just don't see him as a fit for this offense. People like yourself insisted that Brady could never be more than a backup. Same deal for Cassel. I disagreed then, too. I think Bill took Mallet because there wasn't anything else that appealed to him in that slot, which he tried to trade out of but there were no takers, so ala Ron Wolf who advocated taking a QB every year for development and possible trade if not use, he took him. He has 3 years remaining on his contract. If he passes Hoyer on the depth chart next season. Brady has 4 and will likely be around a few years beyond that.
I think Mallett is the future, and he has the luxury to learn the game from the best in the business as opposed to those who are literally thrown to the wolves...
I like Hoyer, but not real sure he will be in a Patriots Uniform next year...
Then you must think Brady is gone in 2-3 years. Because Mallett is only signed until 2014 and they have to decide on paying him at the franchise QB level by the end of the 2013 season if they want to extend his contract through 2015, and that will be tough to do if he hasn't started a game in the NFL by then.
hoyer simply lacks the one thing a QB needs.......an NFL arm
What are you basing this on? I'd like to know what throws Hoyer simply couldnt make due to lack of arm.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Oddly that's what they said about Brady. Turns out arm strength is developable via mechanics and is just the tip of the iceberg as far as things a QB needs at this level. And Bledsow couldn't make it here, on a Belichick team running this offense... Nor anywhere else's once he left here, even though he was just 30 at the time.
I don't hate Mallet, just don't see him as a fit for this offense. People like yourself insisted that Brady could never be more than a backup. Same deal for Cassel. I disagreed then, too. I think Bill took Mallet because there wasn't anything else that appealed to him in that slot, which he tried to trade out of but there were no takers, so ala Ron Wolf who advocated taking a QB every year for development and possible trade if not use, he took him. He has 3 years remaining on his contract. If he passes Hoyer on the depth chart next season. Brady has 4 and will likely be around a few years beyond that.
so let me get this straight.......you are saying that hoyer has the ability because brady had it? and mallett does not? technically speaking, what do you base your conclusion on? what is it about mallett that you see or don't see?
how many years has hoyer been here? why is his arm still a noodle....you'd figure he'd be strenthened by now if he was taking the same path as brady.
the pats could have taken mcelroy later, or enderle or stanzi.....instead of tossing a 3rd rounder that they could have used on one of the several OG's still available and certainly a need at the time.
I understand the argument you're trying to make, but it's not coming together for you
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
What are you basing this on? I'd like to know what throws Hoyer simply couldnt make due to lack of arm.
he's underthrown pretty much every long ball I've ever seen him throw here.
you can chalk it up as something else, but I see it as an arm strength issue
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.