Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree5Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2011, 08:11 PM   #1
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,313
Blog Entries: 20
Default Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Rather than simultaneous discussion in multiple threads on the topic of the Patriots' secondary, how about we consolidate those comments into one thread right here.
jmt57 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-25-2011, 08:39 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

A) We have four fine corners who have been playing injured: Bodden, McCourty, Dowling and Arrington. They have ZERO help from the safeties.

B) We have one solid starting strong safety in Chung, plus perhaps backup quality in Barrett and Brown.

C) We have had 3 special-teamers who seem to be masquarading as safeties: Barrett, Brown and ihedigbo.

I exagerrate some, since on nfl starting quality player would help enormously. Barrett and Brown might be decent #3/#4 safeties and even potential future solid starters.

D) We have some additional players on the roster: Adams, Molden and Ventrone
============================================

BOTTOM LINE
A) By mid-season, the seven man defensive backfield could be much better.

The corners and Chung should be healthier. Brown and Barrett might improve some. And someone we add might help. After all, we now have Adams, Molden, Ihedigbo and Ventrone. It is possible that we might find a way to use these FOUR roster spots to help the secondary in addition to helping the Special Teams.

Also, the secondary could get better if and when the front seven is healthier and learns the system better.
mgteich is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:43 PM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,678
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
A) We have four fine corners who have been playing injured: Bodden, McCourty, Dowling and Arrington. They have ZERO help from the safeties.

B) We have one solid starting strong safety in Chung, plus perhaps backup quality in Barrett and Brown.

C) We have had 3 special-teamers who seem to be masquarading as safeties: Barrett, Brown and ihedigbo.

I exagerrate some, since on nfl starting quality player would help enormously. Barrett and Brown might be decent #3/#4 safeties and even potential future solid starters.

D) We have some additional players on the roster: Adams, Molden and Ventrone
============================================

BOTTOM LINE
A) By mid-season, the seven man defensive backfield could be much better.

The corners and Chung should be healthier. Brown and Barrett might improve some. And someone we add might help. After all, we now have Adams, Molden, Ihedigbo and Ventrone. It is possible that we might find a way to use these FOUR roster spots to help the secondary in addition to helping the Special Teams.

Also, the secondary could get better if and when the front seven is healthier and learns the system better.
I tend to agree with this, at least the first part.

I'd like one of the more knowledgeable and or tape watching posters to comment on the possibility of this safety group getting the job done, or the alternative. I'm all for cutting guys that aren't getting it done/fitting in, but it does seem we've left ourselves short, even if healthy.
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT

Last edited by RayClay; 09-25-2011 at 08:45 PM..
RayClay is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:47 PM   #4
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,803
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
A) We have four fine corners who have been playing injured: Bodden, McCourty, Dowling and Arrington. They have ZERO help from the safeties.

B) We have one solid starting strong safety in Chung, plus perhaps backup quality in Barrett and Brown.

C) We have had 3 special-teamers who seem to be masquarading as safeties: Barrett, Brown and ihedigbo.

I exagerrate some, since on nfl starting quality player would help enormously. Barrett and Brown might be decent #3/#4 safeties and even potential future solid starters.

D) We have some additional players on the roster: Adams, Molden and Ventrone
============================================

BOTTOM LINE
A) By mid-season, the seven man defensive backfield could be much better.

The corners and Chung should be healthier. Brown and Barrett might improve some. And someone we add might help. After all, we now have Adams, Molden, Ihedigbo and Ventrone. It is possible that we might find a way to use these FOUR roster spots to help the secondary in addition to helping the Special Teams.

Also, the secondary could get better if and when the front seven is healthier and learns the system better.
I probably would have reserved judgement if I wasn't at the actual game today where I saw huge huge problems with the safeties that I wouldn't have seen if I had been watching TV. I mean, talk about late breaks. If these guys look like they're not making plays, it's because they are out to lunch.
DarrylS likes this.

Last edited by upstater1; 09-25-2011 at 08:49 PM..
upstater1 is online now  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:47 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

For me, the sad thing is that we are only ONE player short. If Belichick had started Dowling at safety, I might have thought that we had a solid set of seven defensive backs.
If Belichick had retained one of the 3 safeties he let go or secured ONE solid safety, we would be fine later in the season when folks learn the system better; and then we have had a solid set of 8 defensive backs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
I tend to agree with this. I'd like one of the more knowledgeable and or tape watching posters to comment on the possibility of this safety group getting the job domne, or the alternative. I'm all for cutting guys that aren't getting it done/fitting in, but it does seem we've left ourselves short, even if healthy.
JMarr likes this.
mgteich is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:48 PM   #6
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,803
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
I tend to agree with this, at least the first part.

I'd like one of the more knowledgeable and or tape watching posters to comment on the possibility of this safety group getting the job done, or the alternative. I'm all for cutting guys that aren't getting it done/fitting in, but it does seem we've left ourselves short, even if healthy.
I spent the entire game at the stadium with my eye on the two safeties (and partly on Spikes). They simply were not breaking on the ball even when it was obvious where the ball was going. I hate to say it but I think they are totally hopeless. What I saw out there was uglier than I ever expected. When Dowling comes back, I want to see him at safety, or at least Arrington there.
upstater1 is online now  
Old 09-25-2011, 09:02 PM   #7
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,361
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Were any of the safeties who played for the Pats today drafted into the NFL?
Sfpat is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 09:05 PM   #8
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,678
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
I spent the entire game at the stadium with my eye on the two safeties (and partly on Spikes). They simply were not breaking on the ball even when it was obvious where the ball was going. I hate to say it but I think they are totally hopeless. What I saw out there was uglier than I ever expected. When Dowling comes back, I want to see him at safety, or at least Arrington there.
If they are that bad, why would a rookie and an UDFA cornerback make us whole? Don't get me wrong, I thought they might trade Meri and try Dowling at safety, but that was with the assumption od steady sanders there.

Not Not doubting the best coach of the last 2,3,4,5,10 years mind you, just wondering what the thought process is here. Does one of these anonymous safeties have possibilities, or is this a revolving door until we fix it?
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT
RayClay is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 09:07 PM   #9
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,678
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sfpat View Post
Were any of the safeties who played for the Pats today drafted into the NFL?
Barret round seven.
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT
RayClay is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 09:08 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,938
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Pats loss to Bills: defensive backs discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sfpat View Post
Were any of the safeties who played for the Pats today drafted into the NFL?
Yep. Barrett was a 7th round pick.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Sciz is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pats loss to Bills: pass rush discussion Sean Pa Patriot PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 69 09-27-2011 06:35 PM
Pats loss to Bills: late timeout at 1-yard line discussion jukes PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 24 09-26-2011 09:51 AM
Discussion: Loss of Bruschi is Big Hit on PATs D JR4 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 22 07-23-2005 11:23 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566