Tomase: Pats will try to limit Moss' reps - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2008, 02:13 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,535
Default Tomase: Pats will try to limit Moss' reps

Penned by the unmentionable reporter, via the Sporting News:

Quote:
Another potential change -- even though he is one of the most gifted athletes in the league, it's unlikely that Moss will be able to sustain what he did last year, which was to play virtually every snap.

The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps to keep him fresher down the stretch, because he wore down noticeably in the face of more physical coverage last season.
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn...c.php?t=396897
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
sebman2112 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-08-2008, 02:22 PM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
WhiZa's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 5,019
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

I'd rather him be limited in practice, and continue to play most of the reps in games. How are you going to take your play maker off the field because you want to keep him fresh?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- 4 years =
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
WhiZa is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:30 PM   #3
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,297
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

I think this is reasonable. It's not going to be the GFY tour again in 08. They just have to win the Super Bowl, perfection, utter domination, that's not going to be a concern in 08.
BradyManny is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:35 PM   #4
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 47
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

I think Moss will work in the offseason hard enough not to force them to give him plays off. He didn't know what to expect coming in, and from what I understand really worked hard last offseason. He had two down years before that, maybe last year was a tune up for him.

Here's to wishful thinking.
killerrob is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:37 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebman2112 View Post
Penned by the unmentionable reporter, via the Sporting News:


http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn...c.php?t=396897
Some will notice none of his musings are sourced indicating they are just his uninformed opinion (since he has no inside team sources...LOL). This from the man who penned the enlightened piece last Sunday analyzing the Colts success as great first round drafters based on the number of pro bowl selections their first rounders have amassed in the last 12 years - more than half of which are accounted for by Manning and Harrison...

Amazing thing is guys like unmentionble get paid to write their drivel for publications like TSN.
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:40 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,008
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

I don't believe for one second that Tomatohead has any connections left inside the organization, so it's hard for me to think this is anything other than speculation. That being said, I don't think it'd be a bad idea to have Moss limit some reps. Three players who were not viable options for the bulk (or all) of last season can really help with limiting the reps of Moss: Dave Thomas, Sammy Morris, and Chad Jackson. A healthy Laurence Maroney and more balanced offense could have the same effect as well.

From Rotoworld:
Quote:
Patriots beat reporter John Tomase calls Jabar Gaffney an "entrenched starter" heading to the coming season.
Tomase says Chad Jackson and Kelley Washington will vie for fourth WR duties, with the loser possibly being inactive on game days. Washington likely has the edge due to his special teams value. Jackson should still get a long look in the preseason. He's much more physically gifted than Gaffney.
This further discredits Tomase to me. I find it hard to believe that they wont have a competition at the flanker spot at all and that the team is perfectly content with having Gaffney stay in that role. "The loser possibly being inactive" is also a pretty wishy-washy attempt at a "prediction" that is parsed so as to evade criticism... but not from me. It is improbable that they will only dress four receivers for games (Moss, Welker, Gaffney, and one of Washington or Jackson), especially so when you consider Washington has never caught a pass from Brady and Jackson caught but 13 balls in '06. With so few active WRs on game days you would be putting yourself in a very uncomfortable position if there ever were injuries to the top three, as well as limiting your ability for multi-receiver sets. Last year (if I'm not mistaken) they activated at least five every game.

This should probably be posted in the ongoing Chad Jackson thread, but it's simply intended to show that I think JT is a meathead.
__________________
I don't like Dungy and that's because he [was] the head coach of the Colts. Period. End of question. The degree to which I like a player or coach is predicated solely on the color of the laundry they wear on Sunday. When fans admit this and stop bashing players and coaches for any other reason, the world of sports will be infinitely improved.

Last edited by bradmahn; 04-08-2008 at 02:43 PM..
bradmahn is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:41 PM   #7
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,283
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

In order to do that, a true #2 downfield threat will have to emerge. I don't want to start the Chad Jackson debate in another thread, but it has to be mentioned.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:45 PM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,567
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny2344 View Post
I think this is reasonable. It's not going to be the GFY tour again in 08. They just have to win the Super Bowl, perfection, utter domination, that's not going to be a concern in 08.
Oh, I think it'll still be a GFY tour, but one predicated on just demoralizing teams, rather than running up the score. Personally, instead of setting a record for largest scoring margin ever, I'd like to see them set a record for largest TOP margin ever.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 02:52 PM   #9
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,283
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
Oh, I think it'll still be a GFY tour, but one predicated on just demoralizing teams, rather than running up the score. Personally, instead of setting a record for largest scoring margin ever, I'd like to see them set a record for largest TOP margin ever.
Also keep in mind that a lot of teams are going to be pissed off at us for running up the score earlier in the year which will give them extra incentive to play us as hard as possible.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 04-08-2008, 03:18 PM   #10
Banned
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 165
Default Re: "The Pats will try to limit Moss' reps"

Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN View Post
Also keep in mind that a lot of teams are going to be pissed off at us for running up the score earlier in the year which will give them extra incentive to play us as hard as possible.
I think that's right--after the season you had last year, you are going to get everyone's best all 16 weeks (similar to last season's second half).

I also think it would be smart to rest Moss periodically, as he didn't look like the same player in Jan. and Feb. that he was the beginning of the year. Missing most of camp might have had something to do with it, but so might (a) teams catching on as to how best to cover him and (b) just wearing down over a long season--what is he now, 31 or so? That's not quite "gramps", but not quite a young buck in NFL terms, either.....
FootballFanetic is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563