ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
James Sanders expected to return but a little bit disappointed in not seeing some of these new veteran additions and rookies yet
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by jmt57; 08-27-2011 at 01:51 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Bedard: Haynesworth,Ellis,Tate,Dowling,Vereen DOUBTFUL against Lions
Interesting, Bedard and Reiss have a markedly different outlook on the likelihood of several players appearing in the game against the Lions. I guess we'll find out Saturday which is more reliable: Bedard's league source, or Reiss' logic based on who did or did not practice this week.
Reiss lists Haynesworth, Ellis, Dowling and Vereen in the 'reasonable chance' based on practices, while Bedard lists each of them as doubtful per his source.
On the other hand Reiss lists Bodden, Cunningham, and several others as unlikely to play but Bedard does not mention them. Interestingly Reiss has Vereen and Woodhead as 'reasonable chance' and Ridley as 'highly unlikely', which presumably means BJGE will be the primary RB, and Morris and Medlin should get plenty of snpas too.
Re: Bedard: Haynesworth,Ellis,Tate,Dowling,Vereen DOUBTFUL against Lions
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57
Interesting, Bedard and Reiss have a markedly different outlook on the likelihood of several players appearing in the game against the Lions. I guess we'll find out Saturday which is more reliable: Bedard's league source, or Reiss' logic based on who did or did not practice this week.
Reiss lists Haynesworth, Ellis, Dowling and Vereen in the 'reasonable chance' based on practices, while Bedard lists each of them as doubtful per his source.
On the other hand Reiss lists Bodden, Cunningham, and several others as unlikely to play but Bedard does not mention them. Interestingly Reiss has Vereen and Woodhead as 'reasonable chance' and Ridley as 'highly unlikely', which presumably means BJGE will be the primary RB, and Morris and Medlin should get plenty of snpas too.
Well, Bedard does subscribe to the theory that Belichick is going to pull a Moss on Haynesworth and hide him until the start of the season.
I gotta think Cunningham will not play because I can't remember him practicing this week, but I could be wrong.
Re: Bedard: Haynesworth, Ellis, Tate, Dowling, Vereen DOUBTFUL against Lions
I guess my 1st question would be for Bedard: Do you actually cover the Pats? To me thats embarrassing that a beat reporter has no clue whats going on with the team and he is quoting from league sources like who 'the bleacher report". The same goes for Chris Gasper I know BB runs a tight ship but this is ridiculous.
__________________
"Would I rather have my phone records collected and inspected by the National Security Agency, or have my genitalia handled and scrutinized by the Transportation Security Administration? Why choose? In today’s America you can have both."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. - 4 years = To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.