nnmnmmnn

With the rule change, I can't see how you keep a roster spot for what's basically your 7th receiver (behind Hernandez) to return kicks. Edelman, Price, whoever.

Mike Procopio

Tate, Edelman, maybe Price?

nnmnmmnn

Let's give Bedard more credit than that.
Morris over Faulk?
Wilhite over Butler?
Tate 4th?
Price behind Jenkins and Slater?
Butler ahead of lee smith?
Moore, cunninham and Anderson over Carter?

No way.

patchick

I already said I'm not sure if it's his projection because he doesn't say. What we do know is that it's very far from random. Maybe it could be a representation of what he's seen in practice so far in terms of who gets which reps?

nnmnmmnn

Good, so we agree that it's not a ranked depth chart then.

Nor is it ranked by reps in camp, as we can see by Light being at the top spot.

patchick

Good point. So then, if it's not a depth chart what the heck is it??? Bedard has to know that it will be read as a depth chart, since it largely corresponds to the expected pecking order.

Greg A. Bedard

Guys, it's not a depth chart. Starters might be right, but after that it's in no order at all. Mostly how easy it is for me to swap out players with all the transactions.

I will be coming out with my first 53 on Thursday before the Jaguars game.

Thanks for reading. I appreciate it.

And if you have any thoughts on anything, don't be afraid to drop me a line at gbedard@globe.com.

Good, bad or ugly, I welcome the feedback.

patchick

OK, thanks for the clarification! (Maybe alphabetical order next time? )

nnmnmmnn

I take it as a list of 90 guys, nothing more. Maybe at some point 6 months ago it was a ranked list that he's been copy/pasting into randomly for the last two weeks.

nnmnmmnn

Well, that certainly clears things up. I wish the Internet always cooperated like that.