"Patriots Arguments don't add up" - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2008, 10:45 AM   #11
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by pao View Post
If you break down BB's statement there is much to be desired as far as a denial goes. I think it was full of ambiguity cloaked in sincerity. It's good enough for me though, until more info comes out (and IF there is more info it WILL come out).

pao
I don't think there was any ambiguity unless you expend extraordinary effort looking for some based on a pre existing determination to manufacture it.
MoLewisrocks is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-19-2008, 10:53 AM   #12
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,551
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks View Post
I don't think there was any ambiguity unless you expend extraordinary effort looking for some based on a pre existing determination to manufacture it.
It is virtually impossible in the English language to make a statement that is 100% unambiguous - however, yes, you have to go to extraordinary effort on this one; in fact the "not allowed to tape" NFL rule is more ambiguous than this given that it's not completely clear whether the rule states that the usage of the tape is illegal for all games going forward. A reasonable person would say that Belichick interpreted it wrong (intentionally, perhaps) but it is more ambiguous to me that what Belichick said.
BelichickFan is online now  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:53 AM   #13
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,800
Blog Entries: 14
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks View Post
Yup. He's the same nitwit who chose his SB PC to ask BB if in the wake of Rodney getting caught up in an HgH sting in August he had reason to believe any of his other players were using PED's...

Speaking of Mr. Objectivity, Holley is on a mission today questioning Felgie's logic. Earlier it was how he is disingenuous in criticizing others for not attacking their scheduled guests when in fact he doesn't have the stones to ask Vrabel why he went missing down the stretch...(I believe though the answer to this is knowing how they feel about him already Mike can't risk being assaulted on or off the air...).

Holley just pointed out to a caller that Felger persists in characterizing Walsh as someone who was promoted in 2002 (because it dovetails with one of his theories that the culture may have led to poor Matt doing something he expected to be rewarded for - taking the initiative to tape something he wasn't even asked to just because the opportunity presented itself and he just assumed his bosses would welcome the data). Holley knows things about this guy, won't spit it out but believe me, he knows because he stated the taping of Pioli wasn't the only reason he was fired, just the last straw for a guy already on thin ice. He was not promoted, he was laterally transferred from one "coaching assistant" position to another, from video to scouting, but he remained essentially a gopher or intern level employee in each division.
I have been listening as well..the Patriot haters are out there and I think we know who they are...whether local or national...
Pats726 is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:00 AM   #14
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
363839's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,424
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by pao View Post
If you break down BB's statement there is much to be desired as far as a denial goes. I think it was full of ambiguity cloaked in sincerity. It's good enough for me though, until more info comes out (and IF there is more info it WILL come out).

pao
Just like his injury reports.
363839 is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:10 AM   #15
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

This article makes no sense. So based on this guys opinion, Pioli opened himself and the Patriots up to a major defamation/slander lawsuit by claiming Walsh taped conversations when he didn't to deflect blame from the Patriots if Walsh does have a tape of a walththrough. Don't you think Pioli consulted a lawyer to see what he can and can't say about Walsh's termination before he spoke to Mike Reiss? So this guy thinks that Pioli delibrately opened up the Patriots to a potential million dollar plus lawsuit to avoid more sanctions by the league?

Also, his argument to disprove that Belichick really thinks that information from walkthroughs are not that substantial is weak at best. He uses a quote from Mike Martz to prove his point. Except the quote from Mike Martz doesn't actually speak to the information gained from the walkthrough just that he feels that if the Pats actually had someone filming the walkthrough it is a serious allegation. I see that as two different things. He may feel that it is serious allegation that the Pats were spying eventhough he feels that they wouldn't have gained anything from their efforts. If this is the best he has to dispute Belichick's argument, he hasn't done much to prove his point.

I also think his remedies are bogus. He is suggesting Walsh get interviewed on TV by someone giving him softball questions and wait for the Pats to undermine his credibility of what he said? Well, it is good to see that this guy has decided to believe everything Walsh has to say without knowing how credible he really is or even what he has to say.

His wishful thinking that the alleged tape of the walkthrough will magically show up on YouTube seven years after it was allegedly filmed and six months after Spygate broke is way out there.
Rob0729 is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:34 AM   #16
pao
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 825
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
Show us what is ambiguous.

I have never seen a tape of a walkthrough in my entire coaching career is a pretty definitive statement.

Here's the actual quote: "I have never authorized, or heard of, or even seen in any way, shape, or form any other team's walkthrough."

I can't imagine why you believe this is ambiguous. He is saying that not only has he never seen a tape of a walkthrough in his entire career, but that he's never HEARD of another team's walkthrough being discussed in "any way, shape or form."

I can't imagine a more definitive or absolute statement than that.

How did you manage it?
Does anyone have the entire text of his and Pioli's statement? I have only seen partial quotes and, to me, they look ambiguous. Please post a link to the entire quote and I will respond. Briefly what I would like to have seen was something like "The Patriots as an organisation has not in any way been a party to the filming of any practice, walkthrough, or any other activity prohibited by rule or law of the NFL nor have we gained any competitive advantage in any way by any such activity." Like I said, their statement is good enough for me as a fan. But for the good of the organisation and the NFL I feel he could have done better. Just look around at those that are questioning it and you would have to agree that he could have done better. These guys have publicity departments for goodness sake and it took forever for them to make any definitive statement. They could have done alot better imo.

pao
pao is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:49 AM   #17
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,792
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by pao View Post
Does anyone have the entire text of his and Pioli's statement? I have only seen partial quotes and, to me, they look ambiguous. Please post a link to the entire quote and I will respond. Briefly what I would like to have seen was something like "The Patriots as an organisation has not in any way been a party to the filming of any practice, walkthrough, or any other activity prohibited by rule or law of the NFL nor have we gained any competitive advantage in any way by any such activity." Like I said, their statement is good enough for me as a fan. But for the good of the organisation and the NFL I feel he could have done better. Just look around at those that are questioning it and you would have to agree that he could have done better. These guys have publicity departments for goodness sake and it took forever for them to make any definitive statement. They could have done alot better imo.

pao
Your quote is ambiguous. Why add the line we haven't gained advanatge.

Then people will wonder, did they tape, but gained no advantage?

Plus they couldn't even say your quote because they have already admitted to taping during games.

I think you just proved that no matter how absolutist you think your statement is, the haters will always try to find something to nitpick.

Plus, added to that, this isn't a case of a legal argument. Belichick is in no danger in terms of criminal law. He doesn't need to make claims about what the meaning of "is is." In the end, Goodell will rule. No amount of verbal gamesmanship would save Belichick in this case.

And lastly, do you honestly think that someone in the organization would have taped a walkthrough without Belichick's knowing about it at all? If someone had taped a walkthrough without permission, it would have come to Belichick's attention. if someone had taped a walkthrough with Belichick's permission, nothing more needs to be said. Belichick said that he had never HEARD of anyone referring to another team's walkthrough in all his years of coaching.

Last edited by upstater1; 02-19-2008 at 11:51 AM..
upstater1 is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 12:32 PM   #18
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by pao View Post
Does anyone have the entire text of his and Pioli's statement? I have only seen partial quotes and, to me, they look ambiguous. Please post a link to the entire quote and I will respond. Briefly what I would like to have seen was something like "The Patriots as an organisation has not in any way been a party to the filming of any practice, walkthrough, or any other activity prohibited by rule or law of the NFL nor have we gained any competitive advantage in any way by any such activity." Like I said, their statement is good enough for me as a fan. But for the good of the organisation and the NFL I feel he could have done better. Just look around at those that are questioning it and you would have to agree that he could have done better. These guys have publicity departments for goodness sake and it took forever for them to make any definitive statement. They could have done alot better imo.

pao
Here you go:

Belichick said:

"In my entire coaching career, I've never seen another team's practice film prior to playing that team," he said. "I have never authorized, or heard of, or even seen in any way, shape, or form any other team's walkthrough. We don't even film our own. We don't even want to see ourselves do anything, that's the pace that it's at. Regardless, I've never been a part of that."

Belichick added that in his "entire coaching career, I have never filmed a walkthrough, our own. I've never been on a staff that has filmed a walkthrough. I'm talking about when I was a head coach. As an assistant, I've never seen a head coach film a walkthrough the day before a game."

Belichick further detailed his interpretation of the NFL's taping rules from the league's Constitution & Bylaws (article 9) and scoffed at a "Spygate" reference yesterday because what the team taped was in view to everyone.

The rule states: "Any use by any club at any time, from the start to the finish of any game in which such club is a participant, of any communications or information-gathering equipment, other than Polaroid-type cameras or field telephones, shall be prohibited, including without limitation videotape machines, telephone tapping, or bugging devices, or any other form of electronic devices that might aid a team during the playing of a game."

Belichick felt the Patriots' actions were in compliance with NFL rules, saying, "My interpretation was that you can't utilize anything to assist you during that game. What our camera guys do is clearly not allowed to be used during the game and has never been used during that game that it was shot."

At the time the Patriots were fined during the season, it was theorized coaches were utilizing the film of opposing signals to make halftime adjustments. Belichick said that was "never, never" the case.

He described the impact of the tapes as "minimal" to the Patriots' preparations, rating it a "one" on a scale of 1 to 100.

"On the tape of the signaling that we talk about, that film usually wasn't even completed until Thursday or Friday of the following week. It was that low of a priority," he said. "In other words, the video guys had so much other stuff to do on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday getting ready for the other game, that a lot of times that film wasn't even processed until later in the week."

Asked, then, why the Patriots conducted the taping, he responded by saying: "Why do anything? Why study tendencies? Why study stances?"

In the NFL, it is commonplace for scouts to attend games of future opponents and study signals. Detailed records are kept of those signals, including which coach is delivering them.

The Patriots' videotaping of signals was deemed to cross the line, which Belichick apologized for yesterday.

"I respect the integrity of the game and always have and always will," he said. "I regret that any of this, or to whatever extent it has in any way brought that into question or discussion or debate. The decision was made by the commissioner, the practice was immediately stopped, and we're not doing it.

"Just going back over the whole taping incident, if I contacted the league and asked them about the practice, I'm sure they would have told me - as they have done - that it is not permissible. Then I could have avoided all of this.

"I take responsibility for it," he continued. "Even though I felt there was a gray area in the rule and I misinterpreted the rule, that was my mistake and we've been penalized for it. I apologize to everybody that is involved - the league, the other teams, the fans, our team, for the amount of conversation and dialogue that it's caused.

"I misinterpreted the rule. The commissioner made his ruling and we've been penalized for it and tried to move on."

Belichick explained why he felt yesterday was the right time to address the issue, and not during the season when it happened.

"I wasn't comfortable talking about it earlier in the year because my No. 1 job is to win football games," he said. "The more distractions there are, I think the harder it is to prepare. I thought the more conversation about this would just take away from what my primary job and our primary job is, which is to win football games.

"I felt like now, the season has been over for a couple weeks, there are certainly a lot of questions out there about it, I thought this would be the timely point to address it as opposed to during the season, at any point. Of course, it came up a number of times."

Pioli said:

Pioli said Walsh was terminated in January 2003 after he discovered Walsh was "secretly tape-recording conversations between him and me." Pioli said he learned of the recording because "two other employees saw him doing it, and I checked after, and heard it on the tape myself."

In the days leading up to this year's Super Bowl, Walsh's potential role in the taping became a hot topic. Yesterday, Pioli detailed the work Walsh did in the personnel department.

"He had come from video, so the first few months his job was to make highlight tapes of draft-eligible players, guys who were going to be free agents," he said. "It's like the entry-level position that we have all the scouting assistants in. It's essentially the same job that I did 15 years ago, which was making copies, picking people up at the airport, data entry, more of the highlight tapes of the players, the draft-eligible guys."

Pioli said reports that indicated Walsh was an "area scout" were incorrect.

Their relationship ended abruptly, according to Pioli.

"The job he was doing, there were two other guys doing it, so essentially the work he was doing wasn't up to the same level as the other people, in my opinion. However, I found out he was secretly tape recording our conversations and he was fired," he said.

Asked if he confronted Walsh for an explanation, Pioli said: "There was never a confrontation. He was just released."



http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal...oli_speak_out/
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:07 PM   #19
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsFanJess's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

This guy is obviously biased and its a waste of time reading his garbage. My favorite part of this article was this:

"Belichick added that in his "entire coaching career, I have never filmed a walkthrough, our own. I've never been on a staff that has filmed a walkthrough. I'm talking about when I was a head coach. As an assistant, I've never seen a head coach film a walkthrough the day before a game."

Those comments weren't just a denial; they were also an attempt to shape the public opinion of what a walkthrough practice is: If Belichick can convince people that walkthroughs just aren't important enough to bother with, he can say that even if Walsh does produce a tape of the Rams' walkthrough, that it wasn't a big deal."


SHAPE PUBLIC OPINION!!! Oh wait, you mean informing the public to the TRUTH is your problem! Of course what you do,which is shape public opinion based on your biased and false assumptions that you turn into facts...is obviously the right way to "shape public opinion". Maybe I just skimmed this piece of trash too quickly and I didnt pick up on where he brought up ANYTHING on how crappy Matt Walsh's credibility is. Obviously if your gonna take sides with someone, dont you think you would investigate their background?? Matt Walsh has lied about half the things on his resume and you turn BB in SP into the lying scheming villians?? Ummm...what??? Where are the questions about Walsh in here? Guess this is why journalists prefer fiction to reality.
PatsFanJess is offline  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:10 PM   #20
pao
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 825
Default Re: "Patriots Arguments dont add up"

Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
Your quote is ambiguous.
Nope, it's not ambiguous.
Quote:
Why add the line we haven't gained advanatge.Then people will wonder, did they tape, but gained no advantage?
Because then if Walsh produces a tape you can argue that even though a tape was made the ORGANISATION as a whole never saw it and didn't gain a competitive advantage from it.

Quote:
Plus they couldn't even say your quote because they have already admitted to taping during games.
I threw that together in two seconds. You're telling me the Pats Publicity dept couldn't have fixed that in the month since this was first announced. Come on.

Quote:
I think you just proved that no matter how absolutist you think your statement is, the haters will always try to find something to nitpick.
I still like mine better. But like I said, I accept BB's comments, there are alot of people that haven't.

Quote:
Plus, added to that, this isn't a case of a legal argument. Belichick is in no danger in terms of criminal law. He doesn't need to make claims about what the meaning of "is is."
I'm not saying he does. And the minutae of "legal argument" is bull crap. The Patriots have a publicist of some sort that would write the correct words. And still, I believe my statement, written in two seconds, would have been better for him.
Quote:
In the end, Goodell will rule. No amount of verbal gamesmanship would save Belichick in this case.
Dude, I'm not looking for "verbal gamesmanship"! Especially since he is innocent, or so I believe. There is no need for verbal gamesmanship if he is innocent. HIS statement is too easily seen as verbal gamenanship though.
Quote:
And lastly, do you honestly think that someone in the organization would have taped a walkthrough without Belichick's knowing about it at all? If someone had taped a walkthrough without permission, it would have come to Belichick's attention.
Wow! Do you really believe this? So if Walsh shows up with a tape BB knew about it? Or should have? Man, you better HOPE that Walsh has NOTHING. I believe there is a possibility that Walsh made a tape and the Patriots organisation didn't know it (and even if they did they certainly won't admit it!). That is why I put in the statement that they never gained a competitive advantage from any such activity. That way if Walsh DOES have a tape you can say he did it on his own and we did not benefit from it.
Quote:
if someone had taped a walkthrough with Belichick's permission, nothing more needs to be said.
He was absolute about that though. He never gave his permission. Doesn't mean someone in the organisation didn't though. That's my point. He could easily have said no one in this organisation gave their permission. Look, the Patriots are catching flak for the statement. They could have done better. It's enough for me AND for most Patriot fans but there are others out there that could have been swayed by a better statement. You can say all you want that you don't give a dam what other think but I do. Especially since it would have been so easy.

pao
pao is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563