02-15-2008, 07:14 PM
|
#29
|
|
On the Roster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
|
Re: Walsh's attorney: NFL's indemnification offer falls short
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amber
If Walsh is compelled to talk in court, game over. I doubt that Goodell would want to extend the appearance of a cover-up. And I really doubt that the Kraft family would want to be accused of covering up for Belichick. That would be a huge lose/lose.
Like the old Chinese curse, these are going to be very interesting times.
|
Yet, MATT has to PROVE that BILL or the PATS AUTHORIZED Matt to video tape or record anything.... can he prove this? Hardly.... the PATS could easily say, we had no knowlddge of this video taping incident(s) never knew Matt was doing this, etc....and Matt look s like the disgruntled employee... One Matt Walsh agains the PATS organization, of he said they said? game over for Matt.... Bill and the pATS would deny any allegation from Matt Walsh, saying Matt acted on his own, without the express or written knowldge of any PATS employee in engaging in such an act....etc....to get revenge for his firing...when they discovered his violations of video taping they fired Matt Walsh...etc... Unless he had audio of Bill saying "go tape this and that" etc....
__________________
“Who? New England?” “Seriously, they're more worried than we are, I promise you. Believe me, they know what's up.”
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by mrperrino; 02-15-2008 at 07:16 PM..
|
|
|
Linear Mode
