Time to groom a QB for future? - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2011, 08:29 PM   #31
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,205
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

The Pats just signed Brady to a pretty big contract; in my opinion that tells me they planning on him being their starting quarterback for at least three more years.

The days of using an early draft pick and planning on having him not get on the field for three years are gone; that's just not reasonable given the dual constraints of the salary cap and free agency. Otherwise you end up in a situation where that player is the equivalent of dead money on the cap and he's free to bolt to free agency by the time you're ready to play him.

And before someone brings up the example of Aaron Rodgers and the Packers, that was a unique situation. There were two dynamics in place: first, flip-flopping Brett Favre had Green Bay convinced that there was a very good chance he would be retiring that year or the next. Second, Rodgers unexpectedly fell in their laps, slipping to their spot in that draft. He represented a very good value so it made sense for them to grab him.

Also, as mentioned before the visits could very well be a smokescreen or just some extra scouting to be used at a later date. Remember last year when so many "experts" were convinced the Pats were going to draft Tim Tebow?
jmt57 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-18-2011, 08:45 PM   #32
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
convertedpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 3,065
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

I wouldn't use a high pick. We've got Brady for at least 2 to 3 more years, if not longer. Hoyer is a pretty good back-up option.

I would be in favour of spending a late pick on a developmental guy with high upside and seeing if we can't get lucky. But I don't see the need to spend a high pick (top 3 rounds) to groom Brady's replacement this year. If there's value in the 4th or 5th, I would be okay with that. I doubt Stanzi drops, but if he's there or McElroy in the 5th/6th, then that might intrigue me.
convertedpatsfan is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 10:27 PM   #33
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,624
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah View Post
Too soon

We have a possible GOAT. Rather than insure he has the best possible supporting cast to win over his next 4 contract years we urinate away a HIGH pick on a backup QB for 2015? I say no. Emphatic no.
Not to mention that it seems clear that BBs preference is to find his next QB by starting with a blank canvass that he can develop in his system.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 12:12 AM   #34
In the Starting Line-up
 
nashvillepatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: nashville
Posts: 3,199
My Mood: Asleep
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

I like what I've seen from Hoyer so far. No need to panic yet.
nashvillepatsfan is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 12:32 AM   #35
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,574
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nashvillepatsfan View Post
I like what I've seen from Hoyer so far. No need to panic yet.
I don't think anyone's panicking. It's simply the realization that it's unlikely that Hoyer is going to be willing to stick around until Brady retires.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 07:24 AM   #36
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,381
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
I don't think anyone's panicking. It's simply the realization that it's unlikely that Hoyer is going to be willing to stick around until Brady retires.
Likely. Guess what? The Pats will pick another diamond in the rough developmental QB to succeed him. What they clearly will not do is use a high draft pick, anything like the examples cited previously for a QB this April.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is online now  
Old 04-19-2011, 07:26 AM   #37
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,381
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57 View Post
The Pats just signed Brady to a pretty big contract; in my opinion that tells me they planning on him being their starting quarterback for at least three more years.

The days of using an early draft pick and planning on having him not get on the field for three years are gone; that's just not reasonable given the dual constraints of the salary cap and free agency. Otherwise you end up in a situation where that player is the equivalent of dead money on the cap and he's free to bolt to free agency by the time you're ready to play him.


And before someone brings up the example of Aaron Rodgers and the Packers, that was a unique situation. There were two dynamics in place: first, flip-flopping Brett Favre had Green Bay convinced that there was a very good chance he would be retiring that year or the next. Second, Rodgers unexpectedly fell in their laps, slipping to their spot in that draft. He represented a very good value so it made sense for them to grab him.

Also, as mentioned before the visits could very well be a smokescreen or just some extra scouting to be used at a later date. Remember last year when so many "experts" were convinced the Pats were going to draft Tim Tebow?
Sane analysis always ruins these alternate universe threads.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is online now  
Old 04-19-2011, 08:21 AM   #38
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,329
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah View Post
Too soon

We have a possible GOAT. Rather than insure he has the best possible supporting cast to win over his next 4 contract years we urinate away a HIGH pick on a backup QB for 2015? I say no. Emphatic no.
It's more a question of how long they will wait. That's only partially driven by how long they think Brady can play at a high level. It will also be driven by who's available and when and at what price.

How long can he play at a high level?

We all hope Brady will prove to be more like Elway (rings at 37 and 38) and Favre than the guys who packed it in before they turned 36. But as tough as TB is, he's already lost a full season to injury and is spending this off-season rehabbing another.

Belichick and Kraft make decisions with their heads, not their hearts, and I don't think that they will put all their eggs in the basket that TB will have the durability of Manning or Favre, as much as they hope he will. Brady gets sacked a lot and, just as importantly, hit a lot. The average retirement age of an SB Era HOF QB is 37.5 and the median is 38 (those numbers are skewed by old timers like Len Dawson, Sonny Jurgensen and Johnny Unitas who retired at 40 as well as by Warren Moon who hung around until 44); 37/38 is just about when Brady's current contract will run out. And, no matter how we explain it away, no QB has won an SB past the age of 38.

The rest is a matter of who is available, when he is available and at what price.

I think they'll take the next QB they feel they can get at a price that reflects the potential value to the franchise.

Kraft is a businessman and counts the beans and runs the numbers with the best of them. He knows that he got lucky beyond his wildest dreams by getting Brady for $303k in his rookie year ($193 base plus $110 bonus) and $275k base plus maybe $75k incentives in his second year. He already knows that he'll be playing with several million of house money when BB tells him, "this is the guy."

Speaking of "lucky," I wouldn't be surprised if they hoard a couple of picks for Andrew Luck next year. But, the one thing we can be sure of is that if the Pats are interested in a QB, we'll only find out about it when Goodell reads the card that begins "And with the _ pick in the 20__ NFL Draft, the Patriots take...".

And, Joe was also "a possible GOAT" when they picked up Steve Young.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.

Last edited by PatsFanSince74; 04-19-2011 at 08:52 AM..
PatsFanSince74 is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 08:35 AM   #39
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,604
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Brady is like fine wine. He'll be mvp at 40.Seriously now...the guy was the unanimous MVP and coming off one of the best seasons ever for a QB and at the same time he is crying about being picked #199 a decade ago.Safe to say that Brady isn't even thinking about retiring.
randomk1 is online now  
Old 04-19-2011, 08:42 AM   #40
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,604
Default Re: Time to groom a QB for future?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanSince74 View Post

And, Joe was also "a possible GOAT" when they drafted Young.
49ers never drafted Young.They got him from the Bucs and he was pretty crappy during that time so the Bucs drafted Testaverde to replace him.
randomk1 is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alright, time to put your pouch on the line for future kicks. QB roster 08! JSn PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 17 09-19-2008 06:31 PM
Jets will groom Daboll to replace Shottenheimer as OC NE_PATS_FAN_54 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 3 02-21-2007 11:06 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC