01-19-2008, 10:59 AM
|
#35
|
|
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 829
|
Re: Is the NE/SD game still the 'real superbowl?'
Quote:
Originally Posted by khantot
---------------
GB beat San Diego by 7 points, a result of missed coverage on a secondary that was redefining itself early in the season. The Vikings game was San Diego's lowest point of the season defensively but has since turned it around after the Jags game (again, San Diego only lost by a TD).
New England beat the Ravens by a field goal, the game that your team definitely lost and a win handed to you by Billick. San Diego took pity on the Ravens and only beat them by 18 points, with a San Diego defense missing key personnel due to injury.
Don't kid yourself thinking that Sunday's game is a lock for New England
I admire your confidence though.
|
See, the funny thing is you have to make excuses as to why your team lost the games it did, and justify the margins. The Pats are 17-0, so there are 0 things to make excuses for.
Face it, you're a sheep of the media if you truly believe the 'best team over the last 8 games' hype.
The best thing SD has going for it, and they truly are big advantages, is their turnover differential, and they're potential on special teams.
|
|
|