Our Run Defense Is Better Than It Has Been In 4 Weeks - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2011, 11:42 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Our Run Defense Is Better Than It Has Been In 4 Weeks

1) SPIKES IS BACK
This is a major plus. Wilfork, Mayo and Spikes in the middle on run downs is major improvement.

1) WRIGHT has not been here for 2 months. Besides, he isn't a key part of the run defense. Eric Moore has been a fine addition that makes us forget Wright. Yes, Wright is a serious loss, but a pretty normal one.

2) BRACE has had a reasonable season, but was his play much better than Pryor or Deaderick who will now get more reps?

3) We need five DL's to be able to have our best schemes. Those 5 are Wilfork, Warren, Pryor, Deaderick and Love. We carried seven defensive backs precisely so that we would have the ability to have a 5 man rotation at this point. Deaderick has been a starter. Love is OK as our #5 as a DT. Our OLB's are well suited to be DE's in the sub packages. The addition of Moore has been awesome.

We are playing DL with 5 players who have played all year. We have our two best performers healthy (Wilfork and G. Warren).

Last edited by jmt57; 01-09-2011 at 12:58 PM..
mgteich is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-09-2011, 11:45 AM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
convertedpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 3,073
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than In 4 Weeks

Hopefully Spikes isn't rusty. He'll definitely help in the run defense.

The loss of Brace shouldn't be underestimated though. He was probably our best DE against the run. I wonder if Love might play nose and they'll put Vince at end to compensate, or whether Deaderick takes Brace's spot.

Wright's absence won't be felt in the run game, though he was our best interior pass rusher. But we've found a way to manage. I wonder if Vince will get more reps too. He picked up two sacks against the Dolphins, might be ready for more.
convertedpatsfan is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 12:01 PM   #3
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,759
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than In 4 Weeks

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
1) SPIKES IS BACK
This is a major plus. Wilfork, Mayo and Spikes in the middle on run downs is major improvement.

1) WRIGHT has not been here for 2 months. Besides, he isn't a key part of the run defense. Eric Moore has been a fine addition that makes us forget Wright. Yes, Wright is a serious loss, but a pretty normal one.
Eric Moore and Mike Wright don't play the same position

Quote:
2) BRACE has had a reasonable season, but was his play much better than Pryor or Deaderick who will now get more reps?
Brace has the potential to be an excellent run stopping DL but never really put it together this season. His playing time has been very, very limited. He seems able to have an impact, but the season we had didnt have an awful lot to do with his contributions.

Quote:
3) We need five DL's to be able to have our best schemes. Those 5 are Wilfork, Warren, Pryor, Deaderick and Love. We carried seven defensive backs precisely so that we would have the ability to have a 5 man rotation at this point. Deaderick has been a starter. Love is OK as our #5 as a DT. Our OLB's are well suited to be DE's in the sub packages. The addition of Moore has been awesome.
May not really even need 5, or at least the 5th is no more than a few snaps to give rest.
We use 2 DL on about 2/3 of the downs and 3 on about 1/3.


Quote:
We are playing DL with 5 players who have played all year. We have our two best [performers healthy (Wilfork and G. Warren).
If you hate the DL we had all year, then there is something to complain aobut. If you are happy with the DL all year, there is nothing to see here.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 12:06 PM   #4
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 701
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than In 4 Weeks

Quote:
Originally Posted by convertedpatsfan View Post
Hopefully Spikes isn't rusty. He'll definitely help in the run defense.

The loss of Brace shouldn't be underestimated though. He was probably our best DE against the run. I wonder if Love might play nose and they'll put Vince at end to compensate, or whether Deaderick takes Brace's spot.

Wright's absence won't be felt in the run game, though he was our best interior pass rusher. But we've found a way to manage. I wonder if Vince will get more reps too. He picked up two sacks against the Dolphins, might be ready for more.
Yeah. Brace started playing much better in the 2nd-half of the season. He will be missed..

Key is for Spikes to step-up. If we stop the Jets' run, Jets' must rely on Sanchez, and we know that is not what the Jets want...
zipster9 is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 01:37 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than In 4 Weeks

A) IMHO, Love has NOT looked very good at nose.

B) Wilfork will continue to get more reps than a patriot NT has ever had.



Quote:
Originally Posted by convertedpatsfan View Post
Hopefully Spikes isn't rusty. He'll definitely help in the run defense.

The loss of Brace shouldn't be underestimated though. He was probably our best DE against the run. I wonder if Love might play nose and they'll put Vince at end to compensate, or whether Deaderick takes Brace's spot.

Wright's absence won't be felt in the run game, though he was our best interior pass rusher. But we've found a way to manage. I wonder if Vince will get more reps too. He picked up two sacks against the Dolphins, might be ready for more.

Last edited by mgteich; 01-09-2011 at 02:40 PM..
mgteich is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:27 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than In 4 Weeks

I agree. We can depend on four almost all game. The 5th needs to be available and to not be a major liability.

[QUOTE=AndyJohnson;2435479]
May not really even need 5, or at least the 5th is no more than a few snaps to give rest.
We use 2 DL on about 2/3 of the downs and 3 on about 1/3.

Last edited by mgteich; 01-09-2011 at 02:40 PM..
mgteich is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:35 PM   #7
SVN
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,221
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than It Has Been In 4 Weeks

the jets really didnt try to run the ball on us early in the game and tried to win with sanchez .I think this time they will try and establish the run first and foremost.
SVN is online now  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:43 PM   #8
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,391
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than It Has Been In 4 Weeks

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
2) BRACE has had a reasonable season, but was his play much better than Pryor or Deaderick who will now get more reps?
Against the run, yes, his play WAS that much better than Pryor (who is really a pass rushing specialist) and Deaderick (who is getting better against the run, but is still only a rookie). I have to wonder how many times we'll be seeing Love at NT with Wilfork lining up at LDE and Deaderick lining up at RDE. IMO, that would be our best option for defending the Jets' running game.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:47 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
aluminum seats's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,371
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than It Has Been In 4 Weeks

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVN View Post
the jets really didnt try to run the ball on us early in the game and tried to win with sanchez .I think this time they will try and establish the run first and foremost.
Actually, they did. The Jets 1st & best drive in that game featured 60% runnning plays after a deep attempt on the first play. Their second drive was a 3 & out, starting with a run. Their 3rd drive featured runs on 4 of 6 plays. After that, it was 24-3 and that's all she wrote. But they definitely tried to run early.
__________________
"So I'm going to throw myself against the wall...
'Cause I'd rather feel bad than not feel anything at all."
aluminum seats is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:54 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Our Run Defense Is Better Than It Has Been In 4 Weeks

It seems that whenever Love was put at NT and Wilfork moved over, the other team ran in down our throats until Wilforkn was moved back to NT. Perhaps I have a faulty or selective memory.

In any case, I do expect to see Deaderick getting more significant reps than Love, but we'll see. I suspect out best run defense is Warren, Wilfork and Deaderick.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN View Post
Against the run, yes, his play WAS that much better than Pryor (who is really a pass rushing specialist) and Deaderick (who is getting better against the run, but is still only a rookie). I have to wonder how many times we'll be seeing Love at NT with Wilfork lining up at LDE and Deaderick lining up at RDE. IMO, that would be our best option for defending the Jets' running game.
mgteich is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brady's first two weeks vs. Manning's first two weeks (2008) Disco Volante PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 32 10-12-2009 04:07 PM
With our Defense having some holes,Who do you not want to see against NE in 6 weeks PATRIOTSFANINPA PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 13 12-05-2007 09:36 PM
Four weeks to get the run defense/run offense fixed MrBigglesWorth PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 12-05-2007 11:05 AM
Defense just solid and very stabile after 6 weeks... PATRIOT64 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 2 10-22-2006 10:53 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566