ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
According to the Patriots, Reiss, Rappaport, and Price.
I've never been as down on him as others and while there are other players who may be more deserving, it is a great honor for him. Congrats 36!
__________________ Patriots Football... It is what it is!
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
So is this the first ever POW award given for sending a key opponent to the sidelines early?
Sanders did play well, but as others have noted Chung was the key to the secondary -- and the key to the pick six. I guess it makes sense, though, if you just think of it as "The Patriots' defense clearly played the defensive game of the week, so let's choose the guy who scored for them to represent that."
So is this the first ever POW award given for sending a key opponent to the sidelines early?
Sanders did play well, but as others have noted Chung was the key to the secondary -- and the key to the pick six. I guess it makes sense, though, if you just think of it as "The Patriots' defense clearly played the defensive game of the week, so let's choose the guy who scored for them to represent that."
That sounds about right--and the hit on Ward probably helped as well. Who votes on these things, anyway?
__________________
"So I'm going to throw myself against the wall...
'Cause I'd rather feel bad than not feel anything at all."
These awards are hard to figure. Remember when Chung got hosed on the Special Teams award after the Dolphins game?
Anyway -- watch BB sit Sanders for three games now.
__________________
"If they sought to intimidate us, to terrorize us, to shake us from ... the values that make us who we are, as Americans -- well, it should be pretty clear by now that they picked the wrong city to do it. Not here in Boston. Not here in Boston."
—President Barack Obama, April 18, 2013
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
So, the voters are to try to find the "key" element in the defense rather than the try to assess which player who produced the most? I agree that Chung is the difference maker on our defense. Thagt is not a reason to make him DPOY when the defense does well. The process isn't that sophisicated.
Personally, I don't see why we can't simply congratulate Sanders on his fine performance.
Oh yeah, I remember why. Most fans here think that he should have been cut and still want to replace sit him or him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
So is this the first ever POW award given for sending a key opponent to the sidelines early?
Sanders did play well, but as others have noted Chung was the key to the secondary -- and the key to the pick six. I guess it makes sense, though, if you just think of it as "The Patriots' defense clearly played the defensive game of the week, so let's choose the guy who scored for them to represent that."
Seriously. Sanders is a very good player for us and probably has a lot to do with Chung's intellectual development in the system. I thought he had a very good game, personally, beyond the pick-six.
I'm curious to see if he gets fined or not. I sort of hope he does (not that I'm for his financial loss) only because I think that will send an interesting message to defensive players. I don't think it was a flagrant hit, but it was exactly what they claim isn't allowed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
So, the voters are to try to find the "key" element in the defense rather than the try to assess which player who produced the most? I agree that Chung is the difference maker on our defense. Thagt is not a reason to make him DPOY when the defense does well. The process isn't that sophisicated.
Personally, I don't see why we can't simply congratulate Sanders on his fine performance.
Oh yeah, I remember why. Most fans here think that he should have been cut and still want to replace sit him or him.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.