09-20-2010, 12:54 PM
|
#8
|
|
All Pro Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,254
My Mood:
|
Re: Since when does losing a star player (Revis) help you win a game?
Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1
Lame.
My problem is they didn't go at the CBs enough, and you think the opposite?
I couldn't figure out why they were running the ball.
3rd and 8 is not a good situation for a throw, even if Revis isn't out there.
Even the announcers were mentioning the other Jets CB, but no, they ran the ball.
|
My problem is that they were zeroing in on throwing to Moss not being covered by Revis as compared to when Revis was in there it was more going to Hernandez and a bit of Welker too except for a few shots at Moss and the TD catch.
I believe Belichick thought that when Revis went out Moss was going to be able to beat his coverage...didn't happen and throws were forced.
Had Revis played the whole game we might have seen more throws to the TEs and more of a better mix in the second half like we had in the first half than those wasted bombs to Moss that were not going anywhere.
The Jets secondary is enough good that losing Revis was not the end of the world... now if we lost McCourty who is the only real talent left on the corners,then you might as well pack it up for the season.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by PATRIOTSFANINPA; 09-20-2010 at 12:56 PM..
|
|
|