09-14-2010, 10:10 PM
|
#25
|
|
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,346
|
Re: Brady contract details per Reiss
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
Because the expiring CBA didn't ignore or eliminate rules, it just changed some (like 6 years to FA and no limit on how much or how little you can spend on your roster overall - but lots of limits on how you can spend it on individual extensions - i.e. reallocation rule or 30% rule). And they stipulated that for good reason, to avoid chaos when the new one picks up right where the old one left off essentially... This is an uncapped year, not a year absent rules. The next CBA whenever it comes will essentially be the old CBA with amendedments... How signing bonus is treated will likely be one of the things that doesn't change since it hasn't since the inception of the cap. Once money is amortized against the cap it can't be moved.
|
OK - so is it pretty much accepted that the next CBA is going to be the same as the current one? (only less lucrative to the Players?)
That may indeed be common sense - I just haven't been following that detail of a new CBA that to my knowledge really hadn't been disclosed.
I guess what you suggest does make sense - and that the main posturing with the players is over their share, not in the mechanisms of the salary cap.
|
|
|