DynastyDriven

Where did you hear that Jacksons agent might fight the teams possible IR decision?

BelichickFan

There was some (completely unsubstantiated) rumor about that in training camp. It may be true - or it may not, I'd guess not.

PatsFan37

If Jackson is healthy, he would have a right to be upset. He's trying to develop as a serious WR and the best way to do it is to get some playing time, or to be cut or traded so another team can give him a chance.

Right now, he can't even practice with the team and the situation would be the same if he went on IR.

I don't know the rules in this area, not sure if he would have a grievance under the CBA if he was IR'd while healthy.

As the only other WR signed beyond this year, I have to think the Patriots will do something with him. Exactly what they do will likely be tied to the contract situation with the other WRs.

In other words, if you're looking for an extension for Moss or Gaffney, or a change in the terms of Stallworth's rather large option bonus (or whatever it's called), look for it between the 6th and 9th weeks of the season.

Not sure at what week the rules say you can no longer sign contracts or make trades, anyone know?

A.C Vegas

you can always sign contract but no trades after week 6

__________________
Beware of the MBWC (Media Brain Washing Conspericy) the only known way to stay safe is to read at least one thread here a day. You have been warned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Onion See Wes [Welker], here, the man with the honor of being my chauffeur? This resourceful bastard actually beat me home, so it's not like it can't be done.

BradyManny

I'd want Jackson on the team even if it's just for a few plays a game where you can take advantage of his speed alongside Moss and Stallworth.

What's wrong with carrying 6 WRs? I doubt we're carrying 3 QBs all season, so there's one spot, and unfortunately, there's always injuries, so it seems premature to be worrying about roster spots in relation to the PUP players at this point.

patsox23

TOTALLY AGREE. Not sure why Gaffney gets the Binky treatment around here, and I've been a big defender of his. Given the choice between him and Washington, I pick Washington for S/T's and upside.

patsox23

I wonder if the Pats would make a wink-wink-nudge-nudge deal with CJ and his agent - a promise for an extension (of one year) if they go quietly to the IR.

danny88

Because he is a high 2nd rounder who is always hurt and never plays. Quick, someone post that picture of him in highschool with all the sweatbands tinted visor and all the other things that make him LOOK like a beast.

patsox23

He isn't "always" hurt. He's been ready to play but the Pats have taken it slow with him because of their relative depth at WR. Take it easy.

mgteich

MY GUESS

Troy Brown will be put on IR, so that he can be part of this SB season.

Chad Jackson will be activated, and we will keep 6 wide receivers. We can't put him on IR. He'd fine, and win, a grievance. We could cut him, as some media suggested earlier this year. However, I think that we already made the decision to keep him through next year's camp. After all, he is a great prospect. The cost to keep him another year is negligible.

There is no reason to cut on of our productive receivers (that's all of them) to activate Jackson.