Quote:
Originally Posted by zoostation
Sunday Jack. I've always enjoyed your posts and input on the NYJ boards. What's your take on the entire situation (not just the media trends)?
Thanks.
|
Hey zoo. I love the drama of the story, but the details of it I find less compelling. I would find it compelling if there were some way the video was being transmitted into the booth, or some other sort of cool electronic espionage, but I just find it very impractical. Seems to me, the quickest way for the Patriots to steal signals for in-game use would be a set of binoculars pinned to Ernie Adams' face. Maybe a pair of those glasses like Whitey had in Me, Myself, and Irene.
I like that it has seemingly tarnished the Patriot image. You would too, were the Jets caught. That's the nature of being an opposing fan.
I like Eric Mangini a lot, but I hope, for his own sake if not for the Jets, that he can generate wins. If not, he's going to be a tragic figure in the grand sense.
Lastly, I'm obsessively frustrated (as in, I'm going to read everything until someone gets it all) that no media person, national or local, has investigated this well enough to write the definitive story on Videogate. This scandal has proven one thing - that sportswriters are little more than fans with press passes and mediocre college grades. They're all opinion writers and talking heads, now. No one reports anymore.
I find this frustrating because the curious idiot in me wants to know exactly what was taken and how it was used. Not to mention, I get frustrated with people who should understand the what/where/how, but speak of it in clearly wrong terms. Hines Ward, for example, saying how, "They knew everything and were calling things out." Well, Hines, that's not what they were caught doing. The questions is, whether someone was getting information on signals to Tom Brady - the only person who could use it - to call audibles.