How Pats Built: 2000 to 2007 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2007, 08:28 AM   #1
Practice Squad
 
Vern's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 249
Default How Pats Built: 2000 to 2007

I've been tracking the Pats roster makeup for a few years now (originally this was spurred to debunk insinuation that Borges made that all the SB teams were really a product of mostly guys left over by Parcells). I haven't posted them here yet, but here are the updated results for 2007.

Note: I do not limit myself to the opening day 53 man roster. My criterion is that a player is on the roster for a significant period of time during the season, or that they contributed something (e.g. a starter who goes on IR in Week 3 would count, but so would a guy like M. Hill who was hardly ever active, but on the roster for a long long time). I never bothered to define rock solid criterion, but the fringe guys don't skew the number that badly. In 02 and 03 when I first started doing this, there was tremendous "throughput" of players, and I wanted to capture that. Anyway, I present charts based on total players, and on percent of roster so you can decide. The numbers will drift a bit as well during the season, but I keep updating. For example, right now I'm including all the PUP players.

Finally, some have contended that the fringe players skew the FA spots in here, but it's not been so to date. From time to time I go back and filter down just to players who saw time on the field or to just starters, or whatever, and the proportions year to year have held up. If/when I do that at the end of 07, we can check again.

Now for the results...
__________________
"It's good! It's goooood!!" - Gil and Geno 2/3/02

Last edited by Vern; 09-06-2007 at 08:41 AM..
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-06-2007, 08:29 AM   #2
Practice Squad
 
Vern's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 249
Default Roster Makeup by Percentage

Roster by percentage in attached image
Attached Images
File Type: jpg percentroster00-07.JPG (45.5 KB, 449 views)
__________________
"It's good! It's goooood!!" - Gil and Geno 2/3/02
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:30 AM   #3
Practice Squad
 
Vern's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 249
Default Roster Makeup - Total Players

Roster makeup, total players
Attached Images
File Type: jpg totalroster00-07.JPG (45.1 KB, 443 views)
__________________
"It's good! It's goooood!!" - Gil and Geno 2/3/02
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:40 AM   #4
Practice Squad
 
Vern's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 249
Default Observations

1. We've ALWAYS had a way larger percentage of Free Agents than we're typically given credit for. We may not make a splash for the top guys all the time, but we have lots of UDFAs, and middle class FAs like Kyle Brady, Heath Evans, Chad Scott and so on. We have more top FAs that typically noted as well (Harrison, Colvin, Thomas, etc.)

2. The Draft percentage of the team has steadily grown, but the best years (take 04 as the best right now) usually don't have the draft percentage going much beyond 40%. A constant influx of "veterans" to balance the draft seems to be a key part of BB's team building strategy.

3. The lack of FA additions in 06 really was a one year abberation, not the culmination of some shift towards the draft.

4. There was a massive purge post the Caroll/Grier years. Thank you for Kevin Faulk, but that was pretty much it. Tons of FA adds and removals those years (total players I included were higher in 00 through 02 than in any subsequent years).

5. For the record, the Parcells group by 03/04 was already down to 7 players (key guys, but that's typically true for anyone surviving the purge years of 00-02). Now we're down to just two - Troy Brown and Tedy Bruschi. Also, the asterisk on Parcell's is because we all know he didn't get to pick his groceries. Call it Parcells/Grier if you want.

6. They really do use about 60 players a year in some form or another. I think I might be getting a bit stricter in my criterion for inclusion as the years progress. I'll check that at some point.
__________________
"It's good! It's goooood!!" - Gil and Geno 2/3/02

Last edited by Vern; 09-06-2007 at 08:46 AM..
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:51 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
edzo44's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 524
My Mood: Happy
Post Re: How Pats Built: 2000 to 2007

Nice work! Thanks for the effort.
This stuff is really interesting. Never thought or realized the team base was so heavily laden with free agent acquisitions.
__________________
We've had a bunch of practices. We're going out there everyday. They're tired. They're sore. There's a little bit of information overload, but it is pro football. Nobody ever said it was going to be easy."

- - - Bill Belichick
edzo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:58 AM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,572
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Observations

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vern View Post
1. We've ALWAYS had a way larger percentage of Free Agents than we're typically given credit for. We may not make a splash for the top guys all the time, but we have lots of UDFAs, and middle class FAs like Kyle Brady, Heath Evans, Chad Scott and so on. We have more top FAs that typically noted as well (Harrison, Colvin, Thomas, etc.)

2. The Draft percentage of the team has steadily grown, but the best years (take 04 as the best right now) usually don't have the draft percentage going much beyond 40%. A constant influx of "veterans" to balance the draft seems to be a key part of BB's team building strategy.

3. The lack of FA additions in 06 really was a one year abberation, not the culmination of some shift towards the draft.
One quick question--how do you count rookie UDFAs? [I'd argue they count as draft picks, rather than true FA acquisitions.]
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:37 AM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,688
My Mood: Sad
Default Re: How Pats Built: 2000 to 2007

This is great, thsnk you. Since you may have access to the data. For the draft picks can you breakdown the round of each 'contributor' was taken 1-7 plus UDFA?

I am interested to see percentages assigned by round. Example:
5 round 1 picks - 5 contributed - 100%
8 round seven picks - 3 contributed 37.5%

Thanks again, great stuff.
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 11:02 AM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,350
Default Re: Roster Makeup by Percentage

awesome effort. Thanks a ton!
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 01:05 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Roster Makeup by Percentage

Poor Borges, to be so colorblind in a vivid world.

Thanks Vern!
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 01:20 PM   #10
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: How Pats Built: 2000 to 2007

Is there a way to hide this thread from people like Aqua and DWC? I'd be afraid of their heads exploding if they were to realize that a significant portion of the team is brought in during free agency... And that includes during the 3 years that the Pats won the SB.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC