Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury... - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2007, 01:49 PM   #11
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,322
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress View Post
There is nothing "lame" about profootballweekly, in my book, other than the fact its readership is comprised of football geeks. ProFootballWeekly is a quality publication. The "whispers" column that ESPN publishes every week comes from profootballweekly, and is as good an inside source as exists in football media.
Come on, Pony, get with the program! Profootballweekly clearly fits the definition of "lame" and "complete speculation" because they printed a rumor of bad news. (Example usage: Tomase on Bruschi's wrist, Jackson's knee, etc.) The opposite of lame is "rocking," which is used to describe a publication that prints a sourceless, unsubstantiated rumor of good news. Got it?

Seriously, when it comes to Pats WRs with balky hamstrings, no rumors is good rumors. I'd feel better seeing Moss on the practice field. Not that the team needs him any time soon, but Brady to Moss sounds like such flat-out fun to watch.
patchick is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-28-2007, 01:50 PM   #12
Banned
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,998
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsgo View Post
lets all assume hes going to be I R and if he comes back so be it, then we can put a stop to all the countless threads and posts
Impossible.
danny88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 01:53 PM   #13
In the Starting Line-up
 
PonyExpress's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,646
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
Come on, Pony, get with the program! Profootballweekly clearly fits the definition of "lame" and "complete speculation" because they printed a rumor of bad news. (Example usage: Tomase on Bruschi's wrist, Jackson's knee, etc.) The opposite of lame is "rocking," which is used to describe a publication that prints a sourceless, unsubstantiated rumor of good news. Got it?

Seriously, when it comes to Pats WRs with balky hamstrings, no rumors is good rumors. I'd feel better seeing Moss on the practice field. Not that the team needs him any time soon, but Brady to Moss sounds like such flat-out fun to watch.
I'm glad you're talking to me again, PC. I thought you were angry at me for my political comments and because I didn't like Stewart Bradley. My day just got a little brighter, seriously.
PonyExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 02:25 PM   #14
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,322
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress View Post
I'm glad you're talking to me again, PC. I thought you were angry at me for my political comments and because I didn't like Stewart Bradley.
Heck, no! It takes a lot more than that to get on my bad side. (Check it out, I even talk to Keegs. )

But now you have me thinking about Stewart Bradley again. They say he's looking great in Philly....
patchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 02:41 PM   #15
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

A grade 3 hamstring pull, which is a complete tear of the muscle, requires surgery and a 3 month recovery period. Now we know Moss didn't have surgery, but that gives us a realistic upper limit to the recovery time. His injury was most likely grade 2, the most serious for which surgery isn't required, and for which 4-6 weeks of rest is the recommended treatment. Now Moss may be no longer be young by NFL receiver standards, but 4-6 weeks is the recommendation for an average person, Moss is an athlete who's body is in tip-top shape. No way this turns into a season-ending injury unless he re-aggrevates it, which seems to be exactly what the team is trying to avoid with him. Personally, I don't have much concern about Moss right now.

Last edited by Pujo; 08-28-2007 at 02:42 PM..
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 03:01 PM   #16
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsRI's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,618
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

BB said he was "close" on EEI yesterday. I don't think he would say that if it wasn't the truth, if anything he exagerates the other way.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PatsRI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 03:53 PM   #17
In the Starting Line-up
 
Gunnails's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 2,569
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsRI View Post
BB said he was "close" on EEI yesterday. I don't think he would say that if it wasn't the truth, if anything he exagerates the other way.
=====================================

Yes, we all know that BB's injury reports are always 100% accurate. LOL

Suffice to say that Moss will be listed as day to day for the rest of the season.
Gunnails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 05:37 PM   #18
Practice Squad
 
bbabin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles County
Posts: 401
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunnails View Post
=====================================

Yes, we all know that BB's injury reports are always 100% accurate. LOL

Suffice to say that Moss will be listed as day to day for the rest of the season.
Well in fairness to BB I can't think of an example of him lying about an injury. It's just usually no information or useless information. Saying that a player is day to day is 100% accurate. For example, if Chad Scott had miraculously recovered from his season ending leg injury the next day, he would not have been placed on IR. At least Belichick leaves that option available .

The fact that he said Moss is 'close' is better news than hearing day to day again.
bbabin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 06:18 PM   #19
Practice Squad
 
Vern's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 249
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

I for one, think we'll be fine with EITHER Stallworth OR Moss for a bit. One of them is the deep threat or jump ball type, coupled with the surer catch shorter route guy (Gaffney for example) and then Welker underneath.

With the depth we have now at WR, there's just no reason to rush.
__________________
"It's good! It's goooood!!" - Gil and Geno 2/3/02
Vern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 06:22 PM   #20
In the Starting Line-up
 
Gunnails's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 2,569
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: Pro Football Weekley insists there is concern over Moss's injury...

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbabin View Post
Well in fairness to BB I can't think of an example of him lying about an injury. It's just usually no information or useless information. Saying that a player is day to day is 100% accurate. For example, if Chad Scott had miraculously recovered from his season ending leg injury the next day, he would not have been placed on IR. At least Belichick leaves that option available .

The fact that he said Moss is 'close' is better news than hearing day to day again.
==================================
True enogh, Mangini does it also. Pennington was listed as questionable all season last year.

Last edited by Gunnails; 08-28-2007 at 06:22 PM..
Gunnails is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC