PonyExpress

I've been hard on Seymour, but only because I know how awesome he can be. His performance in 2003 was worthy of NFL DPOY. Although he was outplayed by Warren in 2006, made the mistake of cosying up to Borges, made some critical comments of the Pats in the press, and has had durability issues, I believe Seymour is on the verge of an All-Pro campaign. By all reports he showed up in tremendous shape for mini-camp, and his pride was hurt by some of the criticism he received both locally and in SI from Dr. Z. If Seymour, Warren and Big Vince play up to their potential, this will be the most dominating D-line since the Eagles suited up R. White and Jerome Brown.

Remix 6

its kind of hard playing with a huge brace on your whole arm you know

stinkypete

First, let's not knock too hard on Seymour. Aside from baing banged up recently, Seymour draws constant double teams. While he may be invisible on the stat line, Seymour's effective containment of two blockers opens things up for Warren and Wilfork to dominante. Don't forget that the line struggled when Seymour was out vs. the Jets in November.

Second, at is about f@#&ing time that some media source ranks the New England defensive line over San Diego's. I was going to vomit in my mouth the next time I saw someone rank Castillo/Williams/Olshansky over Seymour/Wilfork/Warren.

patsox23

ridiculous. And I LOVE Warren.

Remix 6

wasnt it Warren who missed the Jets game?

sieglo

Weren't people calling Warren a bust pick a few years ago.

Remix 6

people around here call everyone busts if they dont have a great rookie year.

37Harrison

-signed, Chad Jackson.

__________________
S.H.E.S.

Remix 6

some people are even question Maroney...Watson.

Watson is a inconsistent but hes a huge reason why are offense did well last year

Aqua4Ever04

Ty Warren and Vince Wilfork are UMOs (unmoveable objects.) Richard Seymour is one of the best DEs in the league, I can't argue with this ranking.