Quote:
Originally Posted by BoltsFan
That's an interesting take. I view the Jets and Pats in much the same way. I think it's gonna be hard for NE to own the Jets this year. I don't think Mangini sucks. I think the Jets and Dolphins both have hard on's for your arse and you're gonna have to toss "A" game at both of them if you want to get by them. We'll see...
|
Well, you'll have to accept some homerism (I don't live in Homerville, but the mayor is a friend of mine ...

) but, even so, I think that the gap between the Pats and the Jets is bigger.
The Perfidious Penguin has done a good job and the Jets' off-season moves make sense to me, but the gap last season was bigger than that between the Broncos and the Chargers -- I think that the play-off meeting gave an objective picture. It's true that New England are going to have to be at their best, but complacent is not the message I get from the Patriots after their loss to the Colts.
Coaching changes are a big deal and there's no denying it. From my perspective, an organization that goes 14-2 and sacks their coach looks dysfunctional. If I was absolutely confident that the Bolts' talent couldn't overcome that negative, I would have the Broncos as a lock. As it is, I think that probably both will make the play-offs (Oakland is terrible and KC looks to be on the way down, so there will be some easy wins in the division when the two don't meet) but don't want to guess which will win the division.
Going back to the Jets, they are my other wildcard bet and they are the reason I make Buffalo and Miami locks not to go to the playoffs. Their division is just too strong. I certainly don't think either of them are among the worst five in the NFL, by the way, BetBoy -- that wasn't the question.
(Rationally, I could have made Cleveland a lock not to go to the play-offs too, for similar reasons, but my sentimental side hopes that Romeo can pull off a miracle.)